Literature DB >> 31155516

Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis.

Christhardt Kohler1,2, Hermann Hertel3, Jörg Herrmann4, Simone Marnitz5, Peter Mallmann6, Giovanni Favero7, Andrea Plaikner2, Peter Martus8, Mieczyslaw Gajda9, Achim Schneider10.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic/robotic radical hysterectomy has been historically considered oncologically equivalent to open radical hysterectomy for patients with early cervical cancer. However, a recent prospective randomized trial (Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer, LACC) has demonstrated significant inferiority of the minimally invasive approach. The aim of this study is to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of combined laparoscopic-vaginal radical hysterectomy.
METHODS: Between August 1994 and December 2018, patients with invasive cervical cancer were treated using minimally-invasive surgery at the Universities of Jena, Charité Berlin (Campus CCM and CBF) and Cologne and Asklepios Clinic Hamburg. 389 patients with inclusion criteria identical to the LACC trial were identified. In contrast to the laparoscopic/robotic technique used in the LACC trial, all patients in our cohort underwent a combined transvaginal-laparoscopic approach without the use of any uterine manipulator.
RESULTS: A total of 1952 consecutive patients with cervical cancer were included in the analysis. Initial International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage was IA1 lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI+), IA2 and IB1/IIA1 in 32 (8%), 43 (11%), and 314 (81%) patients, respectively, and histology was squamous cell in 263 (68%), adenocarcinoma in 117 (30%), and adenosquamous in 9 (2%) patients. Lymphovascular invasion was confirmed in 106 (27%) patients. The median number of lymph nodes was 24 (range 2-86). Lymph nodes were tumor-free in 379 (97%) patients. Following radical hysterectomy, 71 (18%) patients underwent adjuvant chemoradiation or radiation. After a median follow-up of 99 (range 1-288) months, the 3-, 4.5-, and 10-year disease-free survival rates were 96.8%, 95.8%, and 93.1 %, and the 3-, 4.5-, and 10-year overall survival rates were 98.5%, 97.8%, and 95.8%, respectively. Recurrence location was loco-regional in 50% of cases with recurrence (n=10). Interestingly, 9/20 recurrences occurred more than 39 months after surgery.
CONCLUSION: The combined laparoscopic-vaginal technique for radical hysterectomy with avoidance of spillage and manipulation of tumor cells provides excellent oncologic outcome for patients with early cervical cancer. Our retrospective data suggest that laparoscopic-vaginal surgery may be oncologically safe and should be validated in further randomized trials. © IGCS and ESGO 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  early cervical cancer; laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (larvh); radical hysterectomy; uterine manipulator; vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (valrh)

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31155516     DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  28 in total

1.  Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Roni Nitecki; Pedro T Ramirez; Michael Frumovitz; Kate J Krause; Ana I Tergas; Jason D Wright; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Alexander Melamed
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 31.777

2.  Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator for cervical cancer stage IB: description of the technique, our experience and results after the era of LACC trial.

Authors:  Andreas Kavallaris; Nektarios Chalvatzas; Antonios Gkoutzioulis; Dimitrios Zygouris
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 3.  Surgical Management of Early Cervical Cancer: When Is Laparoscopic Appropriate?

Authors:  Stefano Greggi; Gennaro Casella; Felice Scala; Francesca Falcone; Serena Visconti; Cono Scaffa
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 4.  Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: the Right Surgical Approach.

Authors:  Benny Brandt; Gabriel Levin; Mario M Leitao
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2022-02-15

5.  Open Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: The CIRCOL Group Study.

Authors:  Glauco Baiocchi; Reitan Ribeiro; Ricardo Dos Reis; Deraldo Fernando Falcao; Andre Lopes; Ronaldo Lucio Rangel Costa; Gabriel Lowndes Souza Pinto; Marcelo Vieira; Lillian Yuri Kumagai; Carlos Chaves Faloppa; Henrique Mantoan; Levon Badiglian-Filho; Audrey Tieko Tsunoda; Tariane Friedrich Foiato; Carlos Eduardo Mattos Cunha Andrade; Leonardo Oliveira Palmeira; Bruna Tirapelli Gonçalves; Paulo Henrique Zanvettor
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Indocyanine green-guided sentinel lymph node mapping during laparoscopic surgery with vaginal cuff closure but no uterine manipulator for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Yoichi Aoki; Hiroyuki Kanao; Atsushi Fusegi; Makiko Omi; Sanshirou Okamoto; Terumi Tanigawa; Hidetaka Nomura; Kohei Omatsu; Akiko Tonooka
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 7.  Increasing global accessibility to high-level treatments for cervical cancers.

Authors:  C Chargari; M Arbyn; A Leary; N R Abu-Rustum; P Basu; F Bray; S Chopra; R Nout; K Tanderup; A N Viswanathan; C Zacharopoulou; J C Soria; E Deutsch; S Gouy; P Morice
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 5.304

8.  Effect of modified no-touch laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on outcomes of early stage cervical cancer: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Fangjie He; Songhua Yuan; Xia Chen; Siyou Zhang; Yubin Han; Tiecheng Lin; Bingnan Xu; Shimin Huang; Zhiyin Pan
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2022-02-13       Impact factor: 4.711

9.  The Landmark Series: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Derman Basaran; Mario M Leitao
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Survival Outcomes in Patients With 2018 FIGO Stage IA2-IIA2 Cervical Cancer Treated With Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy: A Propensity Score-Weighting Analysis.

Authors:  Wancheng Zhao; Yunyun Xiao; Wei Zhao; Qing Yang; Fangfang Bi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.