Literature DB >> 35167007

Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: the Right Surgical Approach.

Benny Brandt1, Gabriel Levin2,3, Mario M Leitao4,5.   

Abstract

OPINION STATEMENT: Radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node assessment is the standard initial therapy for early-stage cervical cancer. Radical hysterectomy via laparotomy (an "open" approach) was first described more than 100 years ago and has been the standard for decades. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been increasingly adopted by many surgeons due to its reported perioperative benefits. MIS was deemed safe for radical hysterectomy for many years based on multiple retrospective publications. Recently, the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial reported that patients randomized to MIS had inferior oncologic outcomes. The results of the LACC trial and subsequent retrospective studies led multiple professional societies to state that open radical hysterectomy should remain the gold standard surgical approach. We acknowledge that the open approach for radical hysterectomy is an appropriate option for all cervical cancer patients eligible for surgical treatment. However, considering the limitations of the LACC trial and the available data from other retrospective studies, we feel the MIS approach should not be simply abandoned. There may still be a role for MIS in cervical cancer surgery for properly and carefully selected cases and with detailed counseling; surgeons should analyze their own outcomes closely in order to perform such counseling. Modification of surgical technique and maintaining proper oncologic surgical principles are key for MIS to remain a viable option. Tumor manipulation and contamination should be avoided. Transcervical uterine manipulators should not be used. Cervical and tumor containment prior to colpotomy, as is performed during an open approach, is required. This will all require validation in future trials. We await the results of ongoing randomized trials to further inform us. A one-size-fits-all approach may be short-sighted; we may need to decide treatment strategy based on the notion of the right surgical approach for the right patient by the right surgeon.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Laparoscopy; Laparotomy; Minimally invasive surgery; Radical hysterectomy; Robotic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35167007     DOI: 10.1007/s11864-021-00919-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol        ISSN: 1534-6277


  70 in total

1.  A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib-IIa cervical cancer.

Authors:  Guangyi Li; Xiaojian Yan; Huilin Shang; Gang Wang; Lushi Chen; Yubin Han
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-01-02       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 2.  Classification of radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Denis Querleu; C Paul Morrow
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 3.  Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri.

Authors:  Neerja Bhatla; Jonathan S Berek; Mauricio Cuello Fredes; Lynette A Denny; Seija Grenman; Kanishka Karunaratne; Sean T Kehoe; Ikuo Konishi; Alexander B Olawaiye; Jaime Prat; Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan; James Brierley; David Mutch; Denis Querleu; David Cibula; Michael Quinn; Hennie Botha; Lax Sigurd; Laurel Rice; Hee-Sug Ryu; Hextan Ngan; Johanna Mäenpää; Andri Andrijono; Gatot Purwoto; Amita Maheshwari; Uttam D Bafna; Marie Plante; Jayashree Natarajan
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 3.561

Review 4.  Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sherif A M Shazly; Mohammad H Murad; Sean C Dowdy; Bobbie S Gostout; Abimbola O Famuyide
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer.

Authors:  F Landoni; A Maneo; A Colombo; F Placa; R Milani; P Perego; G Favini; L Ferri; C Mangioni
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-08-23       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy vs. radical abdominal hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a match controlled study.

Authors:  K S Jackson; N Das; R Naik; A D Lopes; K A Godfrey; M H Hatem; J M Monaghan
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.

Authors:  H Steed; B Rosen; J Murphy; S Laframboise; D De Petrillo; A Covens
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Alexander Melamed; Daniel J Margul; Ling Chen; Nancy L Keating; Marcela G Del Carmen; Junhua Yang; Brandon-Luke L Seagle; Amy Alexander; Emma L Barber; Laurel W Rice; Jason D Wright; Masha Kocherginsky; Shohreh Shahabi; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Cervical Cancer, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  Wui-Jin Koh; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Sarah Bean; Kristin Bradley; Susana M Campos; Kathleen R Cho; Hye Sook Chon; Christina Chu; Rachel Clark; David Cohn; Marta Ann Crispens; Shari Damast; Oliver Dorigo; Patricia J Eifel; Christine M Fisher; Peter Frederick; David K Gaffney; Ernest Han; Warner K Huh; John R Lurain; Andrea Mariani; David Mutch; Christa Nagel; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Amanda Nickles Fader; Steven W Remmenga; R Kevin Reynolds; Todd Tillmanns; Stefanie Ueda; Emily Wyse; Catheryn M Yashar; Nicole R McMillian; Jillian L Scavone
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 12.693

10.  Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Yan-zhou Wang; Li Deng; Hui-cheng Xu; Yao Zhang; Zhi-qing Liang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The Future in Standards of Care for Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery to Improve Training and Education.

Authors:  Vlad I Tica; Andrei A Tica; Rudy L De Wilde
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 4.964

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.