Marco Pozzi1, Faizan Mazhar2, Gabriëlla G A M Peeters2, Chiara Vantaggiato3, Maria Nobile3, Emilio Clementi4, Sonia Radice2, Carla Carnovale2. 1. Scientific Institute IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Bosisio Parini 23842, Lecco, Italy. Electronic address: marco.pozzi@lanostrafamiglia.it. 2. Unit of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences L. Sacco, "Luigi Sacco" University Hospital, Università di Milano, Via GB Grassi 74, 20157 Milan, Italy. 3. Scientific Institute IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Bosisio Parini 23842, Lecco, Italy. 4. Scientific Institute IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Bosisio Parini 23842, Lecco, Italy; Unit of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences L. Sacco, "Luigi Sacco" University Hospital, Università di Milano, Via GB Grassi 74, 20157 Milan, Italy. Electronic address: emilio.clementi@unimi.it.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: An increasing amount of preclinical and clinical evidence links together metabolic regulations and psychopathological mechanisms, in particular linking mood disorders with changes in Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 beta and 5'Adenosine Monophosphate-activated Protein Kinase expression and activity. New hypoglycemic drugs, including thiazolidinediones and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) functional agonists, which work by these mechanisms, have also been described as potential antidepressants. The putative role of thiazolidinediones in depression has been already supported, but no clear evidence exists yet for GLP-1 functional agonists. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to describe the effect of GLP-1 functional agonists on depression rating scales and either support or confute a potential antidepressant role. METHODS: We searched the PubMed and Scopus databases for terms related to DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists, and depression, including symptoms and rating scales with acronyms and full names. We included longitudinal interventional and observational studies on GLP-1 functional agonists used for depression symptoms. We applied a random effects meta-analysis on standardized mean differences before-after treatment, comparing GLP-1 functional agonists versus control treatments. RESULTS: Literature searches found 815 papers, 8 of which were eligible for meta-analysis. Both control treatments (-0.67, 95%C.I. -0.99 - -0.36, Z = 4.24, p < 0.0001) and GLP-1 functional agonists (-1.28, 95%C.I. -2.34 - -0.21, Z = 2.35, p = 0.02) resulted in a significant reduction of depression rating scores, although GLP-1 functional agonists tended to be superior. When a selection was made, including only studies conducted on diabetic patients that did not exclude depressed patients, the effect of GLP-1 functional agonists (-2.09, 95%C.I. -2.28 - -1.91, Z = 22.5, p < 0.00001) was significantly superior to that of control treatments (-0.57, 95%C.I. -0.66 - -0.49, Z = 13.6, p < 0.00001). DISCUSSION: Results of this meta-analysis must be carefully considered, since the amount of studies available was low and heterogeneity was high. If further trials will confirm this hypothesis, GLP-1 functional agonists may be considered as antidepressants, either as adjuncts or in mono-therapy, with a peculiar value for preventing the adverse metabolic effects of long-term antipsychotic therapies used in rehabilitation.
INTRODUCTION: An increasing amount of preclinical and clinical evidence links together metabolic regulations and psychopathological mechanisms, in particular linking mood disorders with changes in Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 beta and 5'Adenosine Monophosphate-activated Protein Kinase expression and activity. New hypoglycemic drugs, including thiazolidinediones and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) functional agonists, which work by these mechanisms, have also been described as potential antidepressants. The putative role of thiazolidinediones in depression has been already supported, but no clear evidence exists yet for GLP-1 functional agonists. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to describe the effect of GLP-1 functional agonists on depression rating scales and either support or confute a potential antidepressant role. METHODS: We searched the PubMed and Scopus databases for terms related to DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists, and depression, including symptoms and rating scales with acronyms and full names. We included longitudinal interventional and observational studies on GLP-1 functional agonists used for depression symptoms. We applied a random effects meta-analysis on standardized mean differences before-after treatment, comparing GLP-1 functional agonists versus control treatments. RESULTS: Literature searches found 815 papers, 8 of which were eligible for meta-analysis. Both control treatments (-0.67, 95%C.I. -0.99 - -0.36, Z = 4.24, p < 0.0001) and GLP-1 functional agonists (-1.28, 95%C.I. -2.34 - -0.21, Z = 2.35, p = 0.02) resulted in a significant reduction of depression rating scores, although GLP-1 functional agonists tended to be superior. When a selection was made, including only studies conducted on diabeticpatients that did not exclude depressedpatients, the effect of GLP-1 functional agonists (-2.09, 95%C.I. -2.28 - -1.91, Z = 22.5, p < 0.00001) was significantly superior to that of control treatments (-0.57, 95%C.I. -0.66 - -0.49, Z = 13.6, p < 0.00001). DISCUSSION: Results of this meta-analysis must be carefully considered, since the amount of studies available was low and heterogeneity was high. If further trials will confirm this hypothesis, GLP-1 functional agonists may be considered as antidepressants, either as adjuncts or in mono-therapy, with a peculiar value for preventing the adverse metabolic effects of long-term antipsychotic therapies used in rehabilitation.
Authors: Lucas Fornari Laurindo; Sandra Maria Barbalho; Elen Landgraf Guiguer; Maricelma da Silva Soares de Souza; Gabriela Achete de Souza; Thiago Marques Fidalgo; Adriano Cressoni Araújo; Heron F de Souza Gonzaga; Daniel de Bortoli Teixeira; Thais de Oliveira Silva Ullmann; Katia Portero Sloan; Lance Alan Sloan Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 5.923