| Literature DB >> 31151235 |
Rui Chen1,2, Lini Huo3, Yogini Jaiswal4, Jiayong Huang5, Zhenguo Zhong6, Jing Zhong7, Leonard Williams8, Xing Xia9, Yan Liang10, Zhenshuo Yan11.
Abstract
Background: Acridine and thiourea derivatives are important compounds in medicinal chemistry due to their diverse biological properties including anticancer and antimicrobial effects. However, literature reveals some side effects associated with use of acridines. It is suggested that hybrid molecules may reduce the side effects and enhance the beneficial properties due to synergistic activity. The objectives of the present study are to synthesize and evaluate the anticancer and antimicrobial properties of new hybrids of acridine thiosemicarbazides derivatives.Entities:
Keywords: acridine; anticancer; antimicrobial; thiosemicarbazides
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31151235 PMCID: PMC6600397 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24112065
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Hybrids of acridine and thiourea group giving acridine thiosemicarbazides.
Scheme 1The synthesis of acridinyl aroyl thiourea derivatives (4a–4e).
The spectral data of the compounds (4a–4e).
| Comp. | Ar | Yield (%) | 1H NMR (DMSO- | 13C NMR (DMSO- | ESI-MS: | Melting Point (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4a |
| 46.7% | 11.36 (s, 1H, -NH), 10.55 (s, 1H, -NH), 10.31 (s, 1H, -NH), 9.38~9.41 (m, 1H, ArH), 8.81 (d, 2H, | 183.36, 165.46, 150.71, 147.98, 147.88, 142.04, 139.99, 133.88, 131.24, 130.68, 129.99, 129.83, 128.65, 128.09, 128.01, 126.80, 125.34, 125.11, 124.94, 123.22, 122.51, 122.32. | 422 | 177.4–180.9 °C |
| 4b |
| 34.0% | 11.09 (s, 1H, -NH), 10.52 (s, 1H, -NH), 10.23 (s, 1H, -NH), 9.40 (t, 1H, ArH), 8.33 (d, 1H, | 183.49, 165.96, 147.98, 147.87, 142.22, 137.27, 133.89, 131.78, 131.26, 130.62, 130.47,129.95, 129.79, 128.85, 128.62, 127.96, 126.71, 125.39, 125.11, 125.02, 123.25, 122.61. | 455 | 203.3–203.9 °C |
| 4c |
| 31.0% | 11.32 (s, 1H, -NH), 10.57 (s, 1H, -NH), 10.32 (s, 1H, -NH), 9.40 (t, 1H, ArH), 8.40 (d, 2H, | 183.29, 165.42, 149.88, 147.99, 147.88, 142.09, 138.76, 133.89, 131.25, 130.68, 130.05, 129.98, 129.84, 128.65, 128.09, 128.00, 126.80, 125.37, 125.12, 124.95, 123.93, 123.24, 122.52, | 466 | 238.7–240.1 °C |
| 4d |
| 68.2% | 10.82 (s, 1H, -NH), 10.49 (s, 1H, -NH), 10.15 (s, 1H, -NH), 9.40 (t, 1H, ArH), 8.33 (d, 1H, | 183.60, 166.39, 147.99, 142.22, 147.86, 142.41, 133.90, 131.27, 130.58, 130.47, 129.92, 128.77, 128.61, 127.93, 126.64, 126.63, 125.45, 125.11, 123.28, 122.72, 113.97, 55.92. | 451 | 184.2–187.4 °C |
| 4e |
| 58.6% | 11.09 (s, 1H, -NH), 10.52 (s, 1H, -NH), 10.19 (s, 1H, -NH), 9.40 (dd, | 183.51, 166.82, 147.98, 147.86, 142.39, 133.90, 132.93, 131.26, 130.59, 129.92, 129.75, 128.71, 128.61, 127.93, 126.64, 125.43, 125.09, 123.26, 123.26, 122.74 | 421 | 181.4–182.9 °C |
Antibacterial activity of 4a–4e presented as the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (μM).
| Compounds | Gram-Positive Bacteria | Gram-Negative Bacteria | Antifungal Activity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 10 | >100 | >100 | 10 | >100 |
|
| 40 | 20 | >100 | 20 | 80 |
|
| 10 | 10 | 20 | 10 | 10 |
|
| >100 | >100 | >100 | >100 | 40 |
|
| 40 | 80 | >100 | 20 | 20 |
| Streptomycin | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
The IC50 value of the synthesized compounds obtained for anti-proliferative activity on different tumor cell lines (μM).
| Compounds | HL-60 | MT-4 | Hela | HepG2 | MCF-7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| >100 | 18.42 ± 1.18 | 30.93 ± 1.78 | 32.96 ± 0.81 | >100 |
|
| >100 | 15.73 ± 0.90 | 45.68 ± 2.14 | 54.80 ± 2.95 | >100 |
|
| >100 | 57.59 ± 2.37 | 59.39 ± 2.56 | 51.60 ± 2.46 | >100 |
|
| 59.56 ± 2.54 | 10.96 ± 0.62 | 42.04 ± 2.07 | 29.05 ± 1.87 | >100 |
|
| 70.19 ± 3.72 | 11.63 ± 0.11 | 68.18 ± 3.92 | 58.99 ± 3.11 | >100 |
| cisplatin | 3.66 ± 0.14 | 5.99 ± 0.12 | 6.65 ± 0.12 | 14.45 ± 0.49 | 25.92 ± 1.68 |
Figure 2DNA-topo I inhibitory activity of 4a–4e using camptothecin (CPT) (0.2 mM) as a positive control.
Figure 3Result of validation for Topo I inhibitor camptothecin (CPT), inside the enzyme active site (derived from PDB ID 1T8I).
Interactions between DNA-Topo I (from PDB ID 1T8I) and the compounds.
| Compound | Amino Acid | Type | Hydrophobic Residue | Binding Affinity (Total Score) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| TGP11 | π-π | DA113, ARG364, TGP11, DT10, DT9, DC112 | 8.82 |
| DA113 | π-π | |||
| DC112 | π-π | |||
| ASN722 | Hydrogen Bond | |||
|
| TGP11 | π-π | ARG364, DC112, TGP11, DT10 | 7.82 |
| DA113 | π-π | |||
| DT10 | π-π | |||
| DC112 | π-π | |||
| DA113 | Hydrogen Bond | |||
|
| TGP11 | π-π | TGP11, THR718, DT10,DT9, DA113, DC112 | 8.32 |
| DA113 | π-π | |||
| DC112 | π-π | |||
| ARG364 | Hydrogen Bond | |||
|
| TGP11 | π-π | ARG364, DT10, DA113, ASN352, TRP416, LYS374, GLU418, DC112, TGP11 | 10.31 |
| DA113 | π-π | |||
| DC112 | π-π | |||
| LYS452 | Hydrogen Bond | |||
| GLU356 | Hydrogen Bond | |||
|
| TGP11 | π-π | DT10, TGP11, ARG364, DC112, TRP416, GLU418, ASN352,DA113 | 9.62 |
| DA113 | π-π | |||
| DC112 | π-π | |||
| LYS425 | Hydrogen Bond | |||
| GLU356 | Hydrogen Bond | |||
| CPT | TGP11 | π-π | DC112, DA113, TGP11, DT10, DG12 | 10.27 |
| DA113 | π-π | |||
| DC112 | π-π | |||
| ASP533 | Hydrogen Bond | |||
| ARP364 | Hydrogen Bond |
Figure 4The best pose of the binding mode of compounds with DNA-Topo I complex (PDB:1T8I). (A: CPT, B: 4a, C: 4b, D: 4c, E: 4d F: 4e).
Figure 5AO/EB staining of Compound 4d in MT-4 cells. (A) Cells not treated with 4d (control) and (B) cells treated with Compound 4d at 12.50 μM and, (C) cells treated with Compound 4d at 25 μM concentration.
Figure 6Apoptosis ratio detection of Compound 4d by Annexin V/PI assay. (A) Not treated with Compound 4d (control) for 48 h and, (B) treatment with Compound 4d at 6.25 μM, (C) treatment with Compound 4d at 12.50 μM and (D) treatment with Compound 4d at 25 μM for 48 h each, respectively, (E) The percentage of quadrants Q2 and Q4 was shown as mean ± SD. Data is the representative of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 7Cell-cycle analysis of MT-4 cells treated with Compound 4d, by flow cytometry. (A) Not treated with Compound 4d (control) for 48 h (B) treatment with Compound 4d at 6.25 μM, (C) treatment with Compound 4d at 12.50 μM and, (D) treatment with Compound 4d at 25 μM for 48 h each, respectively, (E) The percentage of each population was shown as mean ± SD. Data is the representative of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.