Literature DB >> 31151123

3D bioprinting of hydrogel constructs with cell and material gradients for the regeneration of full-thickness chondral defect using a microfluidic printing head.

Joanna Idaszek1, Marco Costantini, Tommy A Karlsen, Jakub Jaroszewicz, Cristina Colosi, Stefano Testa, Ersilia Fornetti, Sergio Bernardini, Martyna Seta, Kaja Kasarełło, Robert Wrzesień, Stefano Cannata, Andrea Barbetta, Cesare Gargioli, Jan E Brinchman, Wojciech Święszkowski.   

Abstract

Osteochondral (OC) tissue is a biphasic material comprised of articular cartilage integrated atop subchondral bone. Damage to this tissue is highly problematic, owing to its intrinsic inability to regenerate functional tissue in response to trauma or disease. Further, the function of the tissue is largely conferred by its compartmentalized zonal microstructure and composition. Current clinical treatments fail to regenerate new tissue that recapitulates this zonal structure. Consequently, regenerated tissue often lacks long-term stability. To address this growing problem, we propose the development of tissue engineered biomaterials that mimic the zonal cartilage organization and extracellular matrix composition through the use of a microfluidic printing head bearing a mixing unit and incorporated into an extrusion-based bioprinter. The system is devised so that multiple bioinks can be delivered either individually or at the same time and rapidly mixed to the extrusion head, and finally deposited through a coaxial nozzle. This enables the deposition of either layers or continuous gradients of chemical, mechanical and biological cues and fabrication of scaffolds with very high shape fidelity and cell viability. Using such a system we bioprinted cell-laden hydrogel constructs recapitulating the layered structure of cartilage, namely, hyaline and calcified cartilage. The construct was assembled out of two bioinks specifically formulated to mimic the extracellular matrices present in the targeted tissues and to ensure the desired biological response of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and human articular chondrocytes. Homogeneous and gradient constructs were thoroughly characterized in vitro with respect to long-term cell viability and expression of hyaline and hypertrophic markers by means of real-time quantitative PCR and immunocytochemical staining. After 21 days of in vitro culture, we observed production of zone-specific matrix. The PCR analysis demonstrated upregulated expression of hypertrophic markers in the homogenous equivalent of calcified cartilage but not in the gradient heterogeneous construct. The regenerative potential was assessed in vivo in a rat model. The histological analysis of surgically damaged rat trochlea revealed beneficial effect of the bioprinted scaffolds on regeneration of OC defect when compared to untreated control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31151123     DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab2622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofabrication        ISSN: 1758-5082            Impact factor:   9.954


  27 in total

1.  Gradient Hydrogels.

Authors:  Antonina Lavrentieva
Journal:  Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.635

2.  Extrusion and Microfluidic-based Bioprinting to Fabricate Biomimetic Tissues and Organs.

Authors:  Elham Davoodi; Einollah Sarikhani; Hossein Montazerian; Samad Ahadian; Marco Costantini; Wojciech Swieszkowski; Stephanie Willerth; Konrad Walus; Mohammad Mofidfar; Ehsan Toyserkani; Ali Khademhosseini; Nureddin Ashammakhi
Journal:  Adv Mater Technol       Date:  2020-05-26

3.  Bioprinting 101: Design, Fabrication, and Evaluation of Cell-Laden 3D Bioprinted Scaffolds.

Authors:  Kaivalya A Deo; Kanwar Abhay Singh; Charles W Peak; Daniel L Alge; Akhilesh K Gaharwar
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Computational investigation of interface printing patterns within 3D printed multilayered scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering.

Authors:  Robert Choe; Eoin Devoy; Blake Kuzemchak; Mary Sherry; Erfan Jabari; Jonathan D Packer; John P Fisher
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 9.954

5.  3D bioprinting of a trachea-mimetic cellular construct of a clinically relevant size.

Authors:  Jeong Hun Park; Minjun Ahn; Sun Hwa Park; Hyeonji Kim; Mihyeon Bae; Wonbin Park; Scott J Hollister; Sung Won Kim; Dong-Woo Cho
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Biologically enhanced starch bio-ink for promoting 3D cell growth.

Authors:  Pei Zhuang; Zachary Greenberg; Mei He
Journal:  Adv Mater Technol       Date:  2021-08-08

Review 7.  Novel devices for isolation and detection of bacterial and mammalian extracellular vesicles.

Authors:  Shiana Malhotra; Zarinah M Amin; Garima Dobhal; Sophie Cottam; Thomas Nann; Renee V Goreham
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 5.833

Review 8.  Biomechanical factors in three-dimensional tissue bioprinting.

Authors:  Liqun Ning; Carmen J Gil; Boeun Hwang; Andrea S Theus; Lilanni Perez; Martin L Tomov; Holly Bauser-Heaton; Vahid Serpooshan
Journal:  Appl Phys Rev       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 19.162

9.  Digital Light Processing Based Bioprinting with Composable Gradients.

Authors:  Mian Wang; Wanlu Li; Luis S Mille; Terry Ching; Zeyu Luo; Guosheng Tang; Carlos Ezio Garciamendez; Ami Lesha; Michinao Hashimoto; Yu Shrike Zhang
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 30.849

10.  Extrusion-Based 3D Bioprinting of Gradients of Stiffness, Cell Density, and Immobilized Peptide Using Thermogelling Hydrogels.

Authors:  Merve Kuzucu; Grace Vera; Marco Beaumont; Sascha Fischer; Pan Wei; V Prasad Shastri; Aurelien Forget
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2021-05-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.