Literature DB >> 31150125

Use and early mortality outcomes of active surveillance in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Santino S Butler1, Brandon A Mahal1, Nayan Lamba1, Matthew Mossanen1,2, Neil E Martin1, Kent W Mouw1, Paul L Nguyen1, Vinayak Muralidhar1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Certain patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) may be appropriate candidates for active surveillance (AS). In the current study, the authors sought to characterize AS use and early mortality outcomes for patients with intermediate-risk PCa in the United States.
METHODS: The novel Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Active Surveillance/Watchful Waiting database identified 52,940 men diagnosed with National Comprehensive Cancer Network intermediate-risk PCa (cT2b-c, Gleason score of 7, or a prostate-specific antigen level of 10-20 ng/mL) and actively managed (AS, radiotherapy, or radical prostatectomy) from 2010 through 2015. The Cuzick test assessed AS time trends, and logistic multivariable regression characterized features associated with AS. Fine-Gray and Cox modeling determined PCa-specific mortality (PCSM) and overall survival, respectively.
RESULTS: The rate of AS increased from 3.7% in 2010 to 7.3% in 2015, and from 7.2% to 11.7% among men aged ≥70 years. Among men with favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk disease, the use of AS increased from 7.2% to 14.9% and from 2.2% to 3.8%, respectively (all P value for trend, <.001). The mean age of those patients managed with AS decreased from 69.9 years to 67.9 years (P = .0004). Factors found to be associated with AS included favorable risk disease; black race; higher socioeconomic status; older age; and diagnosis in the West, Northwest, or Midwest regions of the United States. The 5-year PCSM rate was comparable to AS versus treatment among patients with low-risk and favorable intermediate-risk disease, but was worse with AS among those with unfavorable intermediate-risk disease (PCSM, 1.3% vs 0.5%; adjusted hazard ratio, 2.48 [95% CI, 1.11-5.50; P = .026]) and intermediate-risk disease overall (PCSM, 1.1% vs 0.4%; adjusted hazard ratio, 2.34 [95% CI, 1.25-4.37; P = .008]).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of AS for patients with intermediate-risk PCa is increasing across the United States, particularly for older men and those with favorable intermediate-risk disease. Early estimates of cancer-specific and overall mortality rates are low with AS, although significantly higher compared with treatment.
© 2019 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  active surveillance; conservative treatment; mortality; prostatic neoplasms

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31150125     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  7 in total

1.  Active surveillance in favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients: Predictors of deferred intervention and treatment choice.

Authors:  Rashid K Sayyid; Laurence Klotz; John Z Benton; Merry Ma; Phillip Woodruff; Raj Satkunasivam; Martha K Terris; Christopher J D Wallis; Zachary Klaassen
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Trends in treatments for prostate cancer in the United States, 2010-2015.

Authors:  Jianwei Wang; Harry Hua-Xiang Xia; Yuanyuan Zhang; Lanjing Zhang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 6.166

3.  Cause-specific mortality of low and selective intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients with active surveillance or watchful waiting.

Authors:  Xiangkun Wu; Daojun Lv; Md Eftekhar; Chao Cai; Zhijian Zhao; Di Gu; Yongda Liu
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-01

Review 4.  Active Surveillance in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Review of the Current Data.

Authors:  Leandro Blas; Masaki Shiota; Masatoshi Eto
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 6.575

5.  Early Mortality of Prostatectomy vs. Radiotherapy as a Primary Treatment for Prostate Cancer: A Population-Based Study From the United States and East Germany.

Authors:  Daniel Medenwald; Dirk Vordermark; Christian T Dietzel
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Comparison by Race of Conservative Management for Low-Risk and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancers in Veterans From 2004 to 2018.

Authors:  Ravi B Parikh; Kyle W Robinson; Sumedha Chhatre; Elina Medvedeva; John P Cashy; Shika Veera; Joshua M Bauml; Tito Fojo; Amol S Navathe; S Bruce Malkowicz; Ronac Mamtani; Ravishankar Jayadevappa
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-09-01

7.  Impact of Health-related Quality of Life and Prediagnosis Risk of Major Depressive Disorder on Treatment Choice in Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Hannah Riskin-Jones; Tristan Grogan; Amar Kishan; Ann Raldow
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2020-10-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.