Literature DB >> 31149922

A Psychological Foundation for Team-Based Learning: Knowledge Reconsolidation.

Henk G Schmidt1, Jerome I Rotgans, Preman Rajalingam, Naomi Low-Beer.   

Abstract

Although team-based learning is a popular instructional approach, little is known about its psychological foundation. In this Perspective, the authors propose a theoretical account of the psychological mechanisms through which team-based learning works. They suggest a knowledge reconsolidation hypothesis to explain how the distinct phases of team-based learning enable students to learn. Knowledge reconsolidation is the process whereby previously consolidated knowledge is retrieved from memory with the purpose of actively consolidating it again. Reconsolidation aims to preserve, strengthen, and adjust knowledge that is already stored in long-term memory. This process is generally considered an important reason why people who reactivate what they have previously learned many times develop knowledge structures that are extremely stable and easily retrieved.The authors propose that 4 psychological mechanisms enable knowledge reconsolidation, each of which is tied to a distinct phase of team-based learning: retrieval practice, peer elaboration, feedback, and transfer of learning. Before a team-based learning session, students engage in independent, self-directed learning that is often followed by at least one night of sleep. The latter is known to facilitate synaptic consolidation in the brain. During the actual team-based learning session, students are first tested individually on what they learned, then they discuss the answers to the test with a small group of peers, ask remaining "burning questions" to the teacher, and finally engage in a number of application exercises.This knowledge reconsolidation hypothesis may be considered a framework to guide future research into how team-based learning works and its outcomes.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31149922     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  9 in total

1.  Effect of Seating Arrangement on Class Engagement in Team-based Learning: a Quasi-Experimental Study.

Authors:  Hong An Andrew Seet; Emmanuel Tan; Preman Rajalingam
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2022-01-09

2.  Class Size and Student Performance in a Team-Based Learning Course.

Authors:  Minna Ng; Thomas M Newpher
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2021-12-24

3.  Optimising student-led interprofessional learning across eleven health disciplines.

Authors:  Christie van Diggele; Chris Roberts; Inam Haq
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Does team-based learning affect test scores of the basic medical sciences students in a modular curriculum?

Authors:  Masood Ahmed; Saima Athar; Saima Zainab; Shaheena Akbani; Batool Hasan; Uzma Hameed
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr

5.  An intensive anatomy by whole-body dissection elective: A longitudinal study.

Authors:  Annette W Burgess; Georgina M Luscombe; George Ramsey-Stewart
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2022-04-10       Impact factor: 2.409

6.  Incorporating modified team-based learning into a flipped basic medical laboratory course: impact on student performance and perceptions.

Authors:  Jing Shen; Hongyan Qi; Yingying Chen; Ruhuan Mei; Cencen Sun; Zhengyang Wang
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 3.263

7.  Interprofessional team-based learning (TBL): how do students engage?

Authors:  Annette Burgess; Eszter Kalman; Inam Haq; Andrew Leaver; Chris Roberts; Jane Bleasel
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Selecting and Performing Service-Learning in a Team-Based Learning Format Fosters Dissonance, Reflective Capacity, Self-Examination, Bias Mitigation, and Compassionate Behavior in Prospective Medical Students.

Authors:  Alexis Horst; Brian D Schwartz; Jenifer A Fisher; Nicole Michels; Lon J Van Winkle
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  How cognitive psychology changed the face of medical education research.

Authors:  Henk G Schmidt; Silvia Mamede
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 3.853

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.