Literature DB >> 31149249

DEVELOPMENT OF CLINICAL RISK ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR OSTEOPOROSIS (OSTEORISKAPP) USING A SYNDROMIC APPROACH.

O Yilmaz1, V Mevsim2, E Kuruoglu3.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: DEXA is recommended for osteoporosis screening. However, the rate of screening with DEXA is very low. Therefore, methods that can be used more easily and cost effectively are needed.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to develop a clinical risk assessment tool of osteoporosis (OSTEORISKAPP) by using syndromic approach.
DESIGN: A methodological study was performed. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Three hundred and fifty-six participants who are above 50 years old are participants of study and take history and physical examination. Positive likelihood ratio (LR), pre and post test probability, is calculated. A logistic regression analysis and a ROC analysis are made with the model constructed by those criteria.
RESULTS: Eighteen different clinical risk indices are diagnosed. According to LR, 4 of these criteria are minimally effective, 11 of them are weakly effective and 3 of them are medium effective criteria According to results of logistic regression analysis, back pain, waist pain, and usage of cortisone for more than 3 months, vertebra tenderness in physical examination, having dorsal kyphosis and being obese are turned out to be statistically significant in 89.9% confidence interval. AUC is found to be 0.948 and diagnostic test is found to have perfect distinction ability.
CONCLUSION: Syndromic diagnostic criteria that will be used for osteoporosis screening of population and that is cost effective, no need to refer, practical, reliable and has tried to be developed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Osteoporosis; clinical risk factors; logistic regression; syndromic approach

Year:  2018        PMID: 31149249      PMCID: PMC6516599          DOI: 10.4183/aeb.2018.133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Endocrinol (Buchar)        ISSN: 1841-0987            Impact factor:   0.877


  24 in total

1.  Likelihood ratio: A powerful tool for incorporating the results of a diagnostic test into clinical decisionmaking.

Authors:  S R Hayden; M D Brown
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.721

2.  Evaluation of decision rules for referring women for bone densitometry by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  S M Cadarette; S B Jaglal; T M Murray; W J McIsaac; L Joseph; J P Brown
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-07-04       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Validation of the simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation (SCORE) for patient selection for bone densitometry.

Authors:  S M Cadarette; S B Jaglal; T M Murray
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Association between a family history of fractures and bone mineral density in early postmenopausal women.

Authors:  M J Grainge; C A Coupland; S J Cliffe; C E Chilvers; D J Hosking
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 5.  Genetics of osteoporosis: role of steroid hormone receptor gene polymorphisms.

Authors:  L Gennari; L Becherini; A Falchetti; L Masi; F Massart; M L Brandi
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.292

6.  Osteoporosis is markedly underdiagnosed: a nationwide study from Denmark.

Authors:  Peter Vestergaard; Lars Rejnmark; Leif Mosekilde
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-06-12       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  National trends in osteoporosis visits and osteoporosis treatment, 1988-2003.

Authors:  Randall S Stafford; Rebecca L Drieling; Adam L Hersh
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-07-26

8.  The validity of decision rules for selecting women with primary osteoporosis for bone mineral density testing.

Authors:  Suzanne M Cadarette; Warren J McIsaac; Gillian A Hawker; Liisa Jaakkimainen; Alison Culbert; Gihane Zarifa; Ebele Ola; Susan B Jaglal
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-01-17       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Bone density in chronic low back pain: a pilot study.

Authors:  T A Z K Gaber; K A McGlashan; S Love; J R Jenner; A J Crisp
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.477

Review 10.  Osteoporosis: underrated, underdiagnosed and undertreated.

Authors:  Tuan V Nguyen; Jacqueline R Center; John A Eisman
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 7.738

View more
  1 in total

1.  BONE QUALITY IN A YOUNG COHORT OF HIV-POSITIVE PATIENTS.

Authors:  A R Negru; C Tiliscan; A M Tudor; D I Munteanu; C Popescu; M Lazar; A Streinu-Cercel; V Arama; S S Arama
Journal:  Acta Endocrinol (Buchar)       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 0.877

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.