Literature DB >> 10501785

Validation of the simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation (SCORE) for patient selection for bone densitometry.

S M Cadarette1, S B Jaglal, T M Murray.   

Abstract

Bone densitometry using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the 'gold standard' for osteoporosis diagnosis. However, mass screening for osteoporosis has not been recommended, and no consensus has been reached regarding specific targeted screening programs. Recently, the Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation (SCORE) was developed to identify postmenopausal women likely to have low BMD (< or > -2.0 SD of the young adult normal), who may be selected for DXA testing. This instrument uses a case-selective approach to screen for osteoporosis by summing a score based on: age, race, rheumatoid arthritis, history of nontraumatic fracture over 45 years of age, estrogen use, and weight. In our study, SCORE was validated using 398 postmenopausal women at least 45 years of age residing within 50 km of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (one of 9 centers of the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study, a national population-based study). At the recommended threshold of 6, SCORE had a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 32% and a positive predictive value of 64%. From receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, no threshold identified SCORE as a useful instrument in our population; area under the ROC curve was 0. 71. Specificity of the SCORE is poor; at the recommended threshold of 6, 68% of those with normal bone mineral density (BMD) would be selected for bone densitometry. Development and validation of SCORE by Lydick and colleagues may have been confounded by the nature of the study sample; sampling from specialty clinics; and by the choice of outcome, combining data from different DXA machines, and using only data from the femoral neck to identify low BMD. A simple and effective approach to select patients for bone densitometry has yet to be established.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10501785     DOI: 10.1007/s001980050199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  23 in total

Review 1.  Detecting low bone mineral density from dental radiographs: a mini-review.

Authors:  James Graham
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2015-10-26

2.  Performance of four clinical screening tools to select peri- and early postmenopausal women for dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  B Rud; J E B Jensen; L Mosekilde; S P Nielsen; J Hilden; B Abrahamsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Recognition of osteoporosis by primary care physicians.

Authors:  Stephen H Gehlbach; Maureen Fournier; Carol Bigelow
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the performance of clinical risk assessment instruments for screening for osteoporosis or low bone density.

Authors:  S Nayak; D L Edwards; A A Saleh; S L Greenspan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Osteoporosis healthcare disparities in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Irene Hamrick; Qing Cao; Dorothy Agbafe-Mosley; Doyle M Cummings
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Comparison of questionnaire and quantitative ultrasound techniques as screening tools for DXA.

Authors:  R B Cook; D Collins; J Tucker; P Zioupos
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Development and validation of the Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument to facilitate selection of women for bone densitometry.

Authors:  S M Cadarette; S B Jaglal; N Kreiger; W J McIsaac; G A Darlington; J V Tu
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-05-02       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Limited utility of clinical indices for the prediction of symptomatic fracture risk in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Tuan V Nguyen; Jacqueline R Center; Nicholas A Pocock; John A Eisman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-10-30       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  The impact of the use of multiple risk indicators for fracture on case-finding strategies: a mathematical approach.

Authors:  Chris De Laet; Anders Odén; Helena Johansson; Olof Johnell; Bengt Jönsson; John A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Risk Assessment Tools for Osteoporosis Screening in Postmenopausal Women: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Carolyn J Crandall
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.