| Literature DB >> 31148982 |
Aytek Şık1, Sedat Bilecan2, Serkan Kumbasar3, Yaşam Kemal Akpak4, Yilda Arzu Aba5.
Abstract
BACKROUND: A retrospective (case-controlled) study was conducted with the aim of identifying the effect of the use of misoprostol on termination time in patients who did and did not undergo feticide procedures in second trimester pregnancy terminations.Entities:
Keywords: Feticide; second trimester pregnancy; terminations
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31148982 PMCID: PMC6531983 DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v19i1.28
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Afr Health Sci ISSN: 1680-6905 Impact factor: 0.927
Figure 1Consort Flow Diagram
Distribution of Demographic Characteristics
| Demographic Characteristics | Feticide | Feticide |
| Performed (n=99) | Not Performed (n=45) | |
| Age (years) (Mean±SD) | 26.56±5.0 | 28.32±7.1 |
| Gravida (Mean±SD) | 2.33±1.61 | 2.63±1.09 |
| Parity (Mean±SD) | 1.75±0.92 | 1.77±1.1 |
| Number of Abortions (Mean±SD) | 1.50±0.99 | 1.52±0.82 |
| Nulliparous (n/percent) | 30 (30.3%) | 10 (22.2%) |
| Multiparous (n/percent) | 69 (69.7%) | 35 (77.7 |
| Previous cesarean-section (n/percent) | 32 (32.3%) | 12 (26.7%) |
Distributions according to anomaly type
| Anomaly types | Feticide | Feticide | Total |
| 25 (25.3) | 11 (24.5) | 36 (25) | |
| 24 (24.2) | 9 (20.0) | 33 (22.9) | |
| 19 (19.2) | 10 (22.2) | 29 (20.1) | |
| 9 (9.1) | 4 (8.9) | 13 (9.1) | |
| 7 (7.1) | 4 (8.9) | 11 (7.6) | |
| 5 (5.1) | 2 (4.4) | 7 (4.9) | |
| 2 (2.0) | - | 2 (1.4) | |
| 8 (8.1) | 5 (11.1) | 13 (9) | |
| 99 (100) | 45 (100) | 144 (100) |
Dispersion according to abortion/birth intervals (N=144)
| Abortion/Birth Intervals | Minimum | Maximum | Mean±SD | Median |
| (hours) | (hours) | (hours) | (hours) | |
| 2 | 94 | 23.6±22.5 | 14.5 | |
| 7 | 126 | 32.9±24.2 | 27 | |
| 5 | 106 | 32.0±30.0 | 18 |
The evaluation of the gestational weeks and termination durations, and termination condition of women who did and did not undergo feticide
| The evaluation of cases | Feticide Performed | Feticide Not performed | p |
| 70 (70.7) | 33 (73.3) | 0.861 | |
| 29 (29.3) | 12 (26.7) | ||
| 21.24±3.63 | 21.31±3.43 | NS | |
| 35.37±27.55 | 32.42±27.04 | NS |
Fisher's exact test
Student's t-test
Mann-Whitney U test
NS: Not Significant
The relationships of BPD, HC, AC, and FL to termination durations
| Termination Durations | ||
| r | ||
| 0.150 | ||
| −0.343 | ||
| −0.363 | ||
| −0.256 | ||
r: Pearson's correlation coefficient
BPD: Biparietal diamater, AC: Abdominal circumference, FL: Femur length, HC: Head circumference
Figure 2The relationship between termination duration and BDP