Literature DB >> 31147791

Determination of Passive Dry Powder Inhaler Aerodynamic Particle Size Distribution by Multi-Stage Cascade Impactor: International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation & Science (IPAC-RS) Recommendations to Support Both Product Quality Control and Clinical Programs.

Jolyon P Mitchell1, Stephen W Stein2, William Doub3, Adrian P Goodey4, J David Christopher5, Rajni B Patel6, Terrence P Tougas7, Svetlana Lyapustina8.   

Abstract

The multi-stage cascade impactor (CI) is the mainstay method for the determination of the aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) of aerosols emitted from orally inhaled products (OIPs). CIs are designed to operate at a constant flow rate throughout the measurement process. However, it is necessary to mimic an inhalation maneuver to disperse the powder into an aerosol when testing passive dry powder inhalers (DPIs), which constitute a significant portion of available products in this inhaler class. Methods in the pharmacopeial compendia intended for product quality assurance initiate sampling by applying a vacuum to the measurement apparatus using a timer-operated solenoid valve located downstream of the CI, resulting in a period when the flow rate through the impactor rapidly increases from zero towards the target flow rate. This article provides recommendations for achieving consistent APSD measurements, including selection of the CI, pre-separator, and flow control equipment, as well as reviewing considerations that relate to the shape of the flow rate-sampling time profile. Evidence from comparisons of different DPIs delivering the same active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) is indicative that the compendial method for APSD measurement is insensitive as a predictor of pharmacokinetic outcomes. Although inappropriate for product quality testing, guidance is therefore provided towards adopting a more clinically realistic methodology, including the use of an anatomically appropriate inlet and mimicking patient inhalation at the DPI while operating the CI at constant flow rate. Many of these recommendations are applicable to the testing of other OIP classes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aerodynamic particle size analysis; cascade impactor; clinical support testing; dry powder inhaler; quality control

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31147791     DOI: 10.1208/s12249-019-1416-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech        ISSN: 1530-9932            Impact factor:   3.246


  2 in total

Review 1.  Innovative preclinical models for pulmonary drug delivery research.

Authors:  Stephan Ehrmann; Otmar Schmid; Chantal Darquenne; Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser; Josue Sznitman; Lin Yang; Hana Barosova; Laurent Vecellio; Jolyon Mitchell; Nathalie Heuze-Vourc'h
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2020-02-23       Impact factor: 6.648

2.  Internal Volumes of Pharmaceutical Compendial Induction Port, Next-Generation Impactor With and Without Its Pre-separator, and Several Configurations of the Andersen Cascade Impactor With and Without Pre-separator.

Authors:  Daryl L Roberts; Frank Chambers; Mark Copley; Jolyon P Mitchell
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 2.849

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.