Literature DB >> 31147675

FAIRLANE, a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized phase II trial of neoadjuvant ipatasertib plus paclitaxel for early triple-negative breast cancer.

M Oliveira1, C Saura2, P Nuciforo3, I Calvo4, J Andersen5, J L Passos-Coelho6, M Gil Gil7, B Bermejo8, D A Patt9, E Ciruelos10, L de la Peña11, N Xu12, M Wongchenko13, Z Shi13, S M Singel12, S J Isakoff14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This hypothesis-generating trial evaluated neoadjuvant ipatasertib-paclitaxel for early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this randomized phase II trial, patients with early TNBC (T ≥ 1.5 cm, N0-2) were randomized 1 : 1 to receive weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 with ipatasertib 400 mg or placebo (days 1-21 every 28 days) for 12 weeks before surgery. Co-primary end points were pathologic complete response (pCR) rate (ypT0/TisN0) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and immunohistochemistry phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)-low populations. Secondary end points included pCR rate in patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors and pre-surgery response rates by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
RESULTS: pCR rates with ipatasertib versus placebo were 17% versus 13%, respectively, in the ITT population (N = 151), 16% versus 13% in the immunohistochemistry PTEN-low population (N = 35), and 18% versus 12% in the PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered subgroup (N = 62). Rates of overall and complete response (CR) by MRI favored ipatasertib in all three populations (CR rate 39% versus 9% in the PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered subgroup). Ipatasertib was associated with more grade ≥3 adverse events (32% versus 16% with placebo), especially diarrhea (17% versus 1%). Higher cycle 1 day 8 (C1D8) immune score was significantly associated with better response only in placebo-treated patients. All ipatasertib-treated patients with low immune scores and a CR had PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors.
CONCLUSIONS: Adding ipatasertib to 12 weeks of paclitaxel for early TNBC did not clinically or statistically significantly increase pCR rate, although overall response rate by MRI was numerically higher with ipatasertib. The antitumor effect of ipatasertib was most pronounced in biomarker-selected patients. Safety was consistent with prior experience of ipatasertib-paclitaxel. A T-cell-rich environment at C1D8 had a stronger association with improved outcomes in paclitaxel-treated patients than seen for baseline tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. This dependency may be overcome with the addition of AKT inhibition, especially in patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT02301988.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PI3K; PTEN; ipatasertib; neoadjuvant; triple-negative breast cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31147675     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  36 in total

1.  Discovery of an AKT Degrader with Prolonged Inhibition of Downstream Signaling.

Authors:  Inchul You; Emily C Erickson; Katherine A Donovan; Nicholas A Eleuteri; Eric S Fischer; Nathanael S Gray; Alex Toker
Journal:  Cell Chem Biol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 8.116

2.  MK-2206 and Standard Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Improves Response in Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive and/or Hormone Receptor-Negative Breast Cancers in the I-SPY 2 Trial.

Authors:  A Jo Chien; Debasish Tripathy; Kathy S Albain; W Fraser Symmans; Hope S Rugo; Michelle E Melisko; Anne M Wallace; Richard Schwab; Teresa Helsten; Andres Forero-Torres; Erica Stringer-Reasor; Erin D Ellis; Henry G Kaplan; Rita Nanda; Nora Jaskowiak; Rashmi Murthy; Constantine Godellas; Judy C Boughey; Anthony D Elias; Barbara B Haley; Kathleen Kemmer; Claudine Isaacs; Amy S Clark; Julie E Lang; Janice Lu; Larissa Korde; Kirsten K Edmiston; Donald W Northfelt; Rebecca K Viscusi; Douglas Yee; Jane Perlmutter; Nola M Hylton; Laura J Van't Veer; Angela DeMichele; Amy Wilson; Garry Peterson; Meredith B Buxton; Melissa Paoloni; Julia Clennell; Scott Berry; Jeffrey B Matthews; Katherine Steeg; Ruby Singhrao; Gillian L Hirst; Ashish Sanil; Christina Yau; Smita M Asare; Donald A Berry; Laura J Esserman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Ipatasertib, an oral AKT inhibitor, inhibits cell proliferation and migration, and induces apoptosis in serous endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Lindsey Buckingham; Tianran Hao; Jillian O'Donnell; Ziyi Zhao; Xin Zhang; Yali Fan; Wenchuan Sun; Yingao Zhang; Hongyan Suo; Angeles Alvarez Secord; Chunxiao Zhou; Victoria Bae-Jump
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 5.942

4.  Moving Towards Targeted Therapies for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jodi A Kagihara; Elena Shagisultanova; Anosheh Afghahi; Jennifer R Diamond
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2021-05-04

5.  Genetic Alterations in the PI3K/AKT Pathway and Baseline AKT Activity Define AKT Inhibitor Sensitivity in Breast Cancer Patient-derived Xenografts.

Authors:  Albert Gris-Oliver; Marta Palafox; Mafalda Oliveira; Violeta Serra; Laia Monserrat; Fara Brasó-Maristany; Andreu Òdena; Mònica Sánchez-Guixé; Yasir H Ibrahim; Guillermo Villacampa; Judit Grueso; Mireia Parés; Marta Guzmán; Olga Rodríguez; Alejandra Bruna; Caroline S Hirst; Alan Barnicle; Elza C de Bruin; Avinash Reddy; Gaia Schiavon; Joaquín Arribas; Gordon B Mills; Carlos Caldas; Rodrigo Dienstmann; Aleix Prat; Paolo Nuciforo; Pedram Razavi; Maurizio Scaltriti; Nicholas C Turner; Cristina Saura; Barry R Davies
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  Breast Cancer: A Molecularly Heterogenous Disease Needing Subtype-Specific Treatments.

Authors:  Ugo Testa; Germana Castelli; Elvira Pelosi
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-23

Review 7.  Progress in systemic therapy for triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Hongnan Mo; Binghe Xu
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 8.  Emerging Therapeutics for Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Elisa Agostinetto; Daniel Eiger; Kevin Punie; Evandro de Azambuja
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 9.  Optimal Systemic Treatment for Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jenny Furlanetto; Sibylle Loibl
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  PI3K activation promotes resistance to eribulin in HER2-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Javier Cortés; Violeta Serra; Albert Gris-Oliver; Yasir H Ibrahim; Martín A Rivas; Celina García-García; Mònica Sánchez-Guixé; Fiorella Ruiz-Pace; Cristina Viaplana; José M Pérez-García; Antonio Llombart-Cussac; Judit Grueso; Mireia Parés; Marta Guzmán; Olga Rodríguez; Pilar Anton; Patricia Cozar; Maria Teresa Calvo; Alejandra Bruna; Joaquín Arribas; Carlos Caldas; Rodrigo Dienstmann; Paolo Nuciforo; Mafalda Oliveira
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.