Literature DB >> 32774215

Optimal Systemic Treatment for Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Jenny Furlanetto1, Sibylle Loibl1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately 10-15% of all breast tumors are triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). TNBC have a higher risk of relapse and distant metastases compared to other subtypes. The optimal systemic management of TNBC according to national and international guidelines is discussed herein.
SUMMARY: Anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy for patients with TNBC either in the neoadjuvant (NACT) or the adjuvant setting is considered standard of care. Exceptions are small tumors and a low-risk histology, in which chemotherapy can be spared. Dose-dense therapy is more effective in preventing recurrence and increasing survival. The use of nab-paclitaxel instead of a solvent-based taxane can lead to higher pathological complete response (pCR) rates and better outcomes. Platinum agents are effective in increasing pCR when added to anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy at the cost of increased toxicity. Long-term outcome data are lacking. In patients without a pCR, capecitabine leads to improved outcomes. KEY MESSAGES: The standard treatment approach of TNBC is anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy, preferably within the NACT setting. Dose-dense schedules as well as platinum should be considered in the NACT setting. For patients without a pCR, capecitabine is an option to improve the outcome. The role of nab-paclitaxel is under debate. In case of immunogenic tumors, checkpoint inhibitors are promising new agents that merit further investigation.
Copyright © 2020 by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Early breast cancer; Guidelines; Treatment; Triple-negative breast cancer

Year:  2020        PMID: 32774215      PMCID: PMC7383279          DOI: 10.1159/000508759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)        ISSN: 1661-3791            Impact factor:   2.860


  62 in total

Review 1.  Two decades beyond BRCA1/2: Homologous recombination, hereditary cancer risk and a target for ovarian cancer therapy.

Authors:  Christine S Walsh
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence.

Authors:  Rebecca Dent; Maureen Trudeau; Kathleen I Pritchard; Wedad M Hanna; Harriet K Kahn; Carol A Sawka; Lavina A Lickley; Ellen Rawlinson; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant cisplatin in BRCA1-positive breast cancer patients.

Authors:  T Byrski; T Huzarski; R Dent; E Marczyk; M Jasiowka; J Gronwald; J Jakubowicz; C Cybulski; R Wisniowski; D Godlewski; J Lubinski; S A Narod
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  A meta-analysis of platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Dong Wang; Jiafu Feng; Bei Xu
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 3.404

5.  Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without carboplatin in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive and triple-negative primary breast cancers.

Authors:  Carsten Denkert; Gunter von Minckwitz; Jan C Brase; Bruno V Sinn; Stephan Gade; Ralf Kronenwett; Berit M Pfitzner; Christoph Salat; Sherene Loi; Wolfgang D Schmitt; Christian Schem; Karin Fisch; Silvia Darb-Esfahani; Keyur Mehta; Christos Sotiriou; Stephan Wienert; Peter Klare; Fabrice André; Frederick Klauschen; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Kristin Krappmann; Marcus Schmidt; Hans Tesch; Sherko Kümmel; Peter Sinn; Christian Jackisch; Manfred Dietel; Toralf Reimer; Michael Untch; Sibylle Loibl
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Estrogen-receptor status and outcomes of modern chemotherapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Donald A Berry; Constance Cirrincione; I Craig Henderson; Marc L Citron; Daniel R Budman; Lori J Goldstein; Silvana Martino; Edith A Perez; Hyman B Muss; Larry Norton; Clifford Hudis; Eric P Winer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Clinicopathologic features, patterns of recurrence, and survival among women with triple-negative breast cancer in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

Authors:  Nancy U Lin; Ann Vanderplas; Melissa E Hughes; Richard L Theriault; Stephen B Edge; Yu-Ning Wong; Douglas W Blayney; Joyce C Niland; Eric P Winer; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis.

Authors:  Patricia Cortazar; Lijun Zhang; Michael Untch; Keyur Mehta; Joseph P Costantino; Norman Wolmark; Hervé Bonnefoi; David Cameron; Luca Gianni; Pinuccia Valagussa; Sandra M Swain; Tatiana Prowell; Sibylle Loibl; D Lawrence Wickerham; Jan Bogaerts; Jose Baselga; Charles Perou; Gideon Blumenthal; Jens Blohmer; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Jonas Bergh; Vladimir Semiglazov; Robert Justice; Holger Eidtmann; Soonmyung Paik; Martine Piccart; Rajeshwari Sridhara; Peter A Fasching; Leen Slaets; Shenghui Tang; Bernd Gerber; Charles E Geyer; Richard Pazdur; Nina Ditsch; Priya Rastogi; Wolfgang Eiermann; Gunter von Minckwitz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Randomized phase II study of weekly paclitaxel with and without carboplatin followed by cyclophosphamide/epirubicin/5-fluorouracil as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage II/IIIA breast cancer without HER2 overexpression.

Authors:  Masashi Ando; Hideko Yamauchi; Kenjiro Aogi; Satoru Shimizu; Hiroji Iwata; Norikazu Masuda; Naohito Yamamoto; Kenichi Inoue; Shinji Ohono; Katsumasa Kuroi; Tetsutaro Hamano; Tamie Sukigara; Yasuhiro Fujiwara
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Survival analysis of carboplatin added to an anthracycline/taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and HRD score as predictor of response-final results from GeparSixto.

Authors:  S Loibl; K E Weber; K M Timms; E P Elkin; E Hahnen; P A Fasching; B Lederer; C Denkert; A Schneeweiss; S Braun; C T Salat; M Rezai; J U Blohmer; D M Zahm; C Jackisch; B Gerber; P Klare; S Kümmel; C Schem; S Paepke; R Schmutzler; K Rhiem; S Penn; J Reid; V Nekljudova; A-R Hartman; G von Minckwitz; M Untch
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Combinations of Calcitriol with Anticancer Treatments for Breast Cancer: An Update.

Authors:  Mariana Segovia-Mendoza; Janice García-Quiroz; Lorenza Díaz; Rocío García-Becerra
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  [Triple negative breast cancer: clinical, pathological and molecular characteristics].

Authors:  Seifeddine Ben Hammouda; Nihed Abdessayed; Nouha Ben Abdeljelil; Hajer Hanchi; Dorra H Mida; Moncef Mokni
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2022-05-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.