Literature DB >> 31147438

Periprocedural complications of second-generation flow diverter treatment using Pipeline Flex for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kartik Dev Bhatia1, Hans Kortman1, Emanuele Orru1, Jesse M Klostranec1, Vitor M Pereira1, Timo Krings1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Flow diverters are a breakthrough treatment for large and giant intracranial aneurysms but carry a risk of periprocedural death or major stroke. Pipeline Flex is a second-generation device that is thought to have lower complication rates because of improvements in the delivery system as well as increased operator experience. Our objective was to analyze the risk of periprocedural death or major complications using Pipeline Flex for unruptured intracranial aneurysms.
METHODS: A systematic search of three databases was performed for studies of ≥10 treatments using Pipeline Flex for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (2014-2019) using PRISMA guidelines. Random effects meta-analysis was used to pool the rates of periprocedural (<30 days) death, major ischemic stroke, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and minor stroke/transient ischemic attack.
RESULTS: We included eight studies reporting 901 treatments in 879 patients. Periprocedural mortality (<30 days) was 0.8% (5/901; 95% CI 0.4% to 1.5%; I2=0%). Rate of major complications (death, major ischemic stroke, or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage) was 1.8% (14/901; 95% CI 1.0% to 2.7%; I2=0%). Aneurysm size ≥10 mm was a statistically significant predictor of a major complication (OR 6.4; 95% CI 2.0 to 20.7; p=0.002). Risk of a major complication in aneurysms <10 mm was 0.9% (95% CI 0.3% to 1.7%; I2=0%). The meta-analysis was limited by the predominance of anterior circulation aneurysms.
CONCLUSION: Treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms using the Pipeline Flex flow diverter has a low periprocedural risk of death (0.8%) or major complication (1.8%). The risk of a major complication is significantly higher for large/giant aneurysms (4.4%) and is very low for aneurysms <10 mm (0.9%). © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aneurysm; complication; flow diverter; hemorrhage; stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31147438     DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  12 in total

1.  The Safety and Efficacy of Flow Diversion versus Conventional Endovascular Treatment for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Meta-analysis of Real-world Cohort Studies from the Past 10 Years.

Authors:  S Li; C Zeng; W Tao; Z Huang; L Yan; X Tian; F Chen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.966

2.  Pipeline Flex embolisation device with Shield Technology for the treatment of patients with intracranial aneurysms: periprocedural and 6 month outcomes.

Authors:  James Yeomans; Lilian Sandu; Anand Sastry
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2020-10-22

3.  Delayed rupture of intracranial aneurysms after placement of intra-luminal flow diverter.

Authors:  Kun Hou; Guichen Li; Xianli Lv; Baofeng Xu; Kan Xu; Jinlu Yu
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2020-08-27

4.  Aneurysm Treatment in Acute SAH with Hydrophilic-Coated Flow Diverters under Single-Antiplatelet Therapy: A 3-Center Experience.

Authors:  D Lobsien; C Clajus; D Behme; M Ernst; C H Riedel; O Abu-Fares; F G Götz; D Fiorella; J Klisch
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Pipeline flow diversion with adjunctive coil embolization for internal carotid artery aneurysms following an intradural component: results in 46 consecutive aneurysms from a Japanese single-center experience.

Authors:  Tomoaki Akiyama; Hirotoshi Imamura; Masanori Goto; Ryu Fukumitsu; Tadashi Sunohara; Shirabe Matsumoto; Nobuyuki Fukui; Yoshihiro Omura; Tatsumaru Fukuda; Koichi Go; Shinji Kajiura; Masashi Shigeyasu; Kento Asakura; Ryo Horii; Yuji Naramoto; Rikuo Nishii; Yasuhiro Yamamoto; Chiaki Sakai; Nobuyuki Sakai
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  How safe and effective are flow diverters for the treatment of unruptured small/medium intracranial aneurysms of the internal carotid artery? Meta-analysis for evidence-based performance goals.

Authors:  David Fiorella; Larry Gache; Diana Frame; Adam S Arthur
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 5.836

7.  Initial experience with the novel p64MW HPC flow diverter from a cohort study in unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms under dual antiplatelet medication.

Authors:  Andrey Petrov; Ganbaatar Rentsenkhuu; Baatarjan Nota; Erdenebat Ganzorig; Boldbat Regzengombo; Sara Jagusch; Elina Henkes; Hans Henkes
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 1.610

8.  Outcome of Flow Diverters with Surface Modifications in Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Y-L Li; A Roalfe; E Y-L Chu; R Lee; A C O Tsang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in the Dual Antiplatelet Regimen for Intracranial Stenting or Flow-Diverter Treatment for Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms: A Single-Center Cohort Study.

Authors:  K Y Park; T Ozaki; A Kostynskyy; H Kortman; A Hilario; P Nicholson; R Agid; T Krings; V M Pereira
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.966

10.  When Two Is Better than One : The Buddy-wire Technique in Flow-diversion Procedures.

Authors:  Tomas Dobrocky; Hubert Lee; Patrick Nicholson; Ronit Agid; Jeremy Lynch; Saravana Kumar Swaminathan; Timo Krings; Ivan Radovanovic; Vitor Mendes Pereira
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.