S Winzeck1,2, S J T Mocking1, R Bezerra1, M J R J Bouts1, E C McIntosh1, I Diwan1, P Garg1, A Chutinet3,4, W T Kimberly3, W A Copen5, P W Schaefer5, H Ay1,3, A B Singhal3, K Kamnitsas6, B Glocker6, A G Sorensen1, O Wu7. 1. From the Department of Radiology (S.W., S.J.T.M., R.B., M.J.R.J.B., E.C.M., I.D., P.G., H.A., A.G.S., O.W.), Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts. 2. Division of Anaesthesia (S.W.), Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. 3. Departments of Neurology (A.C., W.T.K., H.A., A.B.S.). 4. Department of Medicine (A.C.), Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand. 5. Radiology (W.A.C., P.W.S.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Department of Computing (K.K., B.G.), Imperial College London, London, UK. 7. From the Department of Radiology (S.W., S.J.T.M., R.B., M.J.R.J.B., E.C.M., I.D., P.G., H.A., A.G.S., O.W.), Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts ona@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Accurate automated infarct segmentation is needed for acute ischemic stroke studies relying on infarct volumes as an imaging phenotype or biomarker that require large numbers of subjects. This study investigated whether an ensemble of convolutional neural networks trained on multiparametric DWI maps outperforms single networks trained on solo DWI parametric maps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Convolutional neural networks were trained on combinations of DWI, ADC, and low b-value-weighted images from 116 subjects. The performances of the networks (measured by the Dice score, sensitivity, and precision) were compared with one another and with ensembles of 5 networks. To assess the generalizability of the approach, we applied the best-performing model to an independent Evaluation Cohort of 151 subjects. Agreement between manual and automated segmentations for identifying patients with large lesion volumes was calculated across multiple thresholds (21, 31, 51, and 70 cm3). RESULTS: An ensemble of convolutional neural networks trained on DWI, ADC, and low b-value-weighted images produced the most accurate acute infarct segmentation over individual networks (P < .001). Automated volumes correlated with manually measured volumes (Spearman ρ = 0.91, P < .001) for the independent cohort. For the task of identifying patients with large lesion volumes, agreement between manual outlines and automated outlines was high (Cohen κ, 0.86-0.90; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Acute infarcts are more accurately segmented using ensembles of convolutional neural networks trained with multiparametric maps than by using a single model trained with a solo map. Automated lesion segmentation has high agreement with manual techniques for identifying patients with large lesion volumes.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Accurate automated infarct segmentation is needed for acute ischemic stroke studies relying on infarct volumes as an imaging phenotype or biomarker that require large numbers of subjects. This study investigated whether an ensemble of convolutional neural networks trained on multiparametric DWI maps outperforms single networks trained on solo DWI parametric maps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Convolutional neural networks were trained on combinations of DWI, ADC, and low b-value-weighted images from 116 subjects. The performances of the networks (measured by the Dice score, sensitivity, and precision) were compared with one another and with ensembles of 5 networks. To assess the generalizability of the approach, we applied the best-performing model to an independent Evaluation Cohort of 151 subjects. Agreement between manual and automated segmentations for identifying patients with large lesion volumes was calculated across multiple thresholds (21, 31, 51, and 70 cm3). RESULTS: An ensemble of convolutional neural networks trained on DWI, ADC, and low b-value-weighted images produced the most accurate acute infarct segmentation over individual networks (P < .001). Automated volumes correlated with manually measured volumes (Spearman ρ = 0.91, P < .001) for the independent cohort. For the task of identifying patients with large lesion volumes, agreement between manual outlines and automated outlines was high (Cohen κ, 0.86-0.90; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS:Acute infarcts are more accurately segmented using ensembles of convolutional neural networks trained with multiparametric maps than by using a single model trained with a solo map. Automated lesion segmentation has high agreement with manual techniques for identifying patients with large lesion volumes.
Authors: Gregory W Albers; Michael P Marks; Stephanie Kemp; Soren Christensen; Jenny P Tsai; Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez; Ryan A McTaggart; Michel T Torbey; May Kim-Tenser; Thabele Leslie-Mazwi; Amrou Sarraj; Scott E Kasner; Sameer A Ansari; Sharon D Yeatts; Scott Hamilton; Michael Mlynash; Jeremy J Heit; Greg Zaharchuk; Sun Kim; Janice Carrozzella; Yuko Y Palesch; Andrew M Demchuk; Roland Bammer; Philip W Lavori; Joseph P Broderick; Maarten G Lansberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-01-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Raul G Nogueira; Ashutosh P Jadhav; Diogo C Haussen; Alain Bonafe; Ronald F Budzik; Parita Bhuva; Dileep R Yavagal; Marc Ribo; Christophe Cognard; Ricardo A Hanel; Cathy A Sila; Ameer E Hassan; Monica Millan; Elad I Levy; Peter Mitchell; Michael Chen; Joey D English; Qaisar A Shah; Frank L Silver; Vitor M Pereira; Brijesh P Mehta; Blaise W Baxter; Michael G Abraham; Pedro Cardona; Erol Veznedaroglu; Frank R Hellinger; Lei Feng; Jawad F Kirmani; Demetrius K Lopes; Brian T Jankowitz; Michael R Frankel; Vincent Costalat; Nirav A Vora; Albert J Yoo; Amer M Malik; Anthony J Furlan; Marta Rubiera; Amin Aghaebrahim; Jean-Marc Olivot; Wondwossen G Tekle; Ryan Shields; Todd Graves; Roger J Lewis; Wade S Smith; David S Liebeskind; Jeffrey L Saver; Tudor G Jovin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-11-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lee H Schwamm; Ona Wu; Shlee S Song; Lawrence L Latour; Andria L Ford; Amie W Hsia; Alona Muzikansky; Rebecca A Betensky; Albert J Yoo; Michael H Lev; Gregoire Boulouis; Arne Lauer; Pedro Cougo; William A Copen; Gordon J Harris; Steven Warach Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2018-04-27 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: A G Sorensen; O Wu; W A Copen; T L Davis; R G Gonzalez; W J Koroshetz; T G Reese; B R Rosen; V J Wedeen; R M Weisskoff Journal: Radiology Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: R M Dijkhuizen; S Knollema; H B van der Worp; G J Ter Horst; D J De Wildt; J W Berkelbach van der Sprenkel; K A Tulleken; K Nicolay Journal: Stroke Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: M A Jacobs; P Mitsias; H Soltanian-Zadeh; S Santhakumar; A Ghanei; R Hammond; D J Peck; M Chopp; S Patel Journal: Stroke Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Nidiyare Hevia-Montiel; Juan Ramón Jiménez-Alaniz; Verónica Medina-Bañuelos; Oscar Yáñez-Suárez; Charlotte Rosso; Yves Samson; Sylvain Baillet Journal: Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Date: 2007
Authors: Konstantinos Kamnitsas; Christian Ledig; Virginia F J Newcombe; Joanna P Simpson; Andrew D Kane; David K Menon; Daniel Rueckert; Ben Glocker Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2016-10-29 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Ona Wu; Stefan Winzeck; Anne-Katrin Giese; Brandon L Hancock; Mark R Etherton; Mark J R J Bouts; Kathleen Donahue; Markus D Schirmer; Robert E Irie; Steven J T Mocking; Elissa C McIntosh; Raquel Bezerra; Konstantinos Kamnitsas; Petrea Frid; Johan Wasselius; John W Cole; Huichun Xu; Lukas Holmegaard; Jordi Jiménez-Conde; Robin Lemmens; Eric Lorentzen; Patrick F McArdle; James F Meschia; Jaume Roquer; Tatjana Rundek; Ralph L Sacco; Reinhold Schmidt; Pankaj Sharma; Agnieszka Slowik; Tara M Stanne; Vincent Thijs; Achala Vagal; Daniel Woo; Stephen Bevan; Steven J Kittner; Braxton D Mitchell; Jonathan Rosand; Bradford B Worrall; Christina Jern; Arne G Lindgren; Jane Maguire; Natalia S Rost Journal: Stroke Date: 2019-06-10 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Evan Hann; Iulia A Popescu; Qiang Zhang; Ricardo A Gonzales; Ahmet Barutçu; Stefan Neubauer; Vanessa M Ferreira; Stefan K Piechnik Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Vaanathi Sundaresan; Giovanna Zamboni; Nicola K Dinsdale; Peter M Rothwell; Ludovica Griffanti; Mark Jenkinson Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2021-08-17 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Christopher P Bridge; Bernardo C Bizzo; James M Hillis; John K Chin; Donnella S Comeau; Romane Gauriau; Fabiola Macruz; Jayashri Pawar; Flavia T C Noro; Elshaimaa Sharaf; Marcelo Straus Takahashi; Bradley Wright; John F Kalafut; Katherine P Andriole; Stuart R Pomerantz; Stefano Pedemonte; R Gilberto González Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-02-09 Impact factor: 4.379