Literature DB >> 31147352

Assessment of Explicitly Stated Interval Change on Noncontrast Head CT Radiology Reports.

M Braileanu1, K Crawford2, S R Key2, M E Mullins2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Consistent and standardized reporting of interval change for certain diagnoses may improve the clinical utility of radiology reports. The purpose of this study was to assess explicitly stated interval change of various findings in noncontrast head CT reports.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on successive noncontrast head CT radiology reports from the first 2 weeks of January 2014. Reports with at least 1 prior comparison CT scan were included. Reports with normal examination findings and those that made comparison with only other types of examinations (eg, MR imaging) were excluded. Descriptive and subgroup statistical analyses were performed.
RESULTS: In total, 200 patients with 230 reports and 979 radiographic findings were identified. The average interval between reports was 344.9 ± 695.9 days (range, 0-3556 days). Interval change was mentioned 67.3% (n = 659) of the time for all findings (n = 979). Explicitly stated interval change was significantly associated with nonremote findings (P < .001) and generalized statements of interval change (P < .001). The proportion of interval change reported ranged from 95.3% of the time for hemorrhagic to 36.4% for soft-tissue/osseous categorizations.
CONCLUSIONS: Interval change reporting was variable, mentioned for 67.3% of noncontrast head CT report findings with a prior comparison CT scan. Structured radiology reports may improve the consistent and clear reporting of interval change for certain findings.
© 2019 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31147352      PMCID: PMC7048540          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  22 in total

1.  Structure and content of radiology reports, a quantitative and qualitative study in eight medical centers.

Authors:  Jan M L Bosmans; Joost J Weyler; Paul M Parizel
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Comparing new radiographs with those obtained previously.

Authors:  L Berlin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Characterization of Change and Significance for Clinical Findings in Radiology Reports Through Natural Language Processing.

Authors:  Saeed Hassanpour; Graham Bay; Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 4.  Evaluation of sinus computed tomography scans: a collaborative approach between radiology and otolaryngology.

Authors:  Samuel S Becker; Bernard B O'Malley
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.064

5.  Pattern of brain atrophy rates in autopsy-confirmed dementia with Lewy bodies.

Authors:  Zuzana Nedelska; Tanis J Ferman; Bradley F Boeve; Scott A Przybelski; Timothy G Lesnick; Melissa E Murray; Jeffrey L Gunter; Matthew L Senjem; Prashanti Vemuri; Glenn E Smith; Yonas E Geda; Jonathan Graff-Radford; David S Knopman; Ronald C Petersen; Joseph E Parisi; Dennis W Dickson; Clifford R Jack; Kejal Kantarci
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 6.  Rethinking Normal: Benefits and Risks of Not Reporting Harmless Incidental Findings.

Authors:  Pari V Pandharipande; Brian R Herts; Richard M Gore; William W Mayo-Smith; H Benjamin Harvey; Alec J Megibow; Lincoln L Berland
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 7.  Structured Reporting in Radiology.

Authors:  Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan; Phuong-Anh Thi Duong; Linda Probyn; Leon Lenchik; Tatum A McArthur; Michele Retrouvey; Emily H Ghobadi; Stephane L Desouches; David Pastel; Isaac R Francis
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 8.  Selection of treatment modalities or observation of dural arteriovenous fistulas.

Authors:  Alexandra R Paul; Geoffrey P Colby; Judy Huang; Rafael J Tamargo; Alexander L Coon
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 2.509

9.  Long-term Outcomes of Patients With Giant Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations.

Authors:  Wuyang Yang; Zhikui Wei; Joanna Y Wang; Alice L Hung; Justin M Caplan; Maria Braileanu; Geoffrey P Colby; Alexander L Coon; Rafael J Tamargo; Judy Huang
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Age-related white matter changes.

Authors:  Yun Yun Xiong; Vincent Mok
Journal:  J Aging Res       Date:  2011-08-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.