Literature DB >> 31147263

Outcomes of Serial Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Subsequent Biopsy in Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance.

Walter Hsiang1, Kamyar Ghabili1, Jamil S Syed1, Justin Holder2, Kevin A Nguyen1, Alfredo Suarez-Sarmiento1, Steffen Huber2, Michael S Leapman1, Preston C Sprenkle3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and subsequent biopsy in monitoring prostate cancer (PCa) in men on active surveillance (AS) have not been defined clearly.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether changes in serial mpMRI can predict pathological upgrade among men with grade group (GG) 1 PCa managed with AS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective analysis of men with GG1 on AS with at least two consecutive mpMRI examinations during 2012-2018 who underwent mpMRI/ultrasound fusion or systematic biopsies. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Progression on serial mpMRI was evaluated as a predictor of pathological upgrading to GG≥2 on a follow-up biopsy using clinical, pathological, and imaging factors in binary logistic regression. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were determined. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of 122 patients, 29 men (23.8%) experienced pathological upgrade on the follow-up biopsy. Progression on mpMRI was not associated with pathological upgrade. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of mpMRI progression for predicting pathological upgrade were 41.3%, 54.8%, 22.2%, and 75%, respectively. Age (odds ratio [OR] 1.17, p=0.006), Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score on initial mpMRI (4-5 vs ≤3, OR 7.48, p=0.01), number of positive systematic cores (OR 1.84, p=0.03), number of positive targeted cores (OR 0.44, p=0.04), and maximum percent of targeted core tumor involvement (OR 1.04, p=0.01) were significantly associated with pathological upgrade.
CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe an association between mpMRI progression and pathological upgrade; however, a PI-RADS score of 4-5 on initial mpMRI was predictive of subsequent pathological progression. The continued use of systematic and fusion biopsies appears necessary due to risks of reclassification over time. PATIENT
SUMMARY: Progression on serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging during active surveillance (AS) is not associated with progression on the follow-up biopsy. Both systematic and fusion biopsies are necessary to sufficiently capture progression during AS.
Copyright © 2019 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active surveillance; Fusion biopsy; Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31147263     DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol Focus        ISSN: 2405-4569


  7 in total

Review 1.  Proteomic discovery of non-invasive biomarkers of localized prostate cancer using mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Amanda Khoo; Lydia Y Liu; Julius O Nyalwidhe; O John Semmes; Danny Vesprini; Michelle R Downes; Paul C Boutros; Stanley K Liu; Thomas Kislinger
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Role of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging fusion biopsy in active surveillance of prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Ellis; Thomas P Frye
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-07-18

Review 3.  The current role of MRI for guiding active surveillance in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Guillaume Ploussard; Olivier Rouvière; Morgan Rouprêt; Roderick van den Bergh; Raphaële Renard-Penna
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 16.430

4.  Prostate Cancer Patients Under Active Surveillance with a Suspicious Magnetic Resonance Imaging Finding Are at Increased Risk of Needing Treatment: Results of the Movember Foundation's Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance (GAP3) Consortium.

Authors:  Jonathan Olivier; Weiyu Li; Daan Nieboer; Jozien Helleman; Monique Roobol; Vincent Gnanapragasam; Mark Frydenberg; Mikio Sugimoto; Peter Carroll; Todd M Morgan; Riccardo Valdagni; Jose Rubio-Briones; Grégoire Robert; Phillip Stricker; Andrew Hayen; Ivo Schoots; Masoom Haider; Caroline M Moore; Brian Denton; Arnauld Villers
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-01-03

5.  Association Between a 22-feature Genomic Classifier and Biopsy Gleason Upgrade During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin H Press; Tashzna Jones; Olamide Olawoyin; Soum D Lokeshwar; Syed N Rahman; Ghazal Khajir; Daniel W Lin; Matthew R Cooperberg; Stacy Loeb; Burcu F Darst; Yingye Zheng; Ronald C Chen; John S Witte; Tyler M Seibert; William J Catalona; Michael S Leapman; Preston C Sprenkle
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-02-11

6.  Doubling of Decipher Biopsy Genomic Score Is Related to Disease Reclassification on Subsequent Surveillance Biopsy but Not Adverse Features on Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Kamyar Ghabili; Nathan Paulson; Jamil S Syed; Cayce B Nawaf; Ghazal Khajir; Darryl T Martin; John Onofrey; Michael S Leapman; Angelique Levi; Jeffrey C Weinreb; Peter A Humphrey; Preston C Sprenkle
Journal:  Case Rep Urol       Date:  2021-03-17

7.  Two Decades of Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer in a Single-Center Cohort: Favorable Outcomes after Transurethral Resection of the Prostate.

Authors:  Sarah Hagmann; Venkat Ramakrishnan; Alexander Tamalunas; Marc Hofmann; Moritz Vandenhirtz; Silvan Vollmer; Jsmea Hug; Philipp Niggli; Antonio Nocito; Rahel A Kubik-Huch; Kurt Lehmann; Lukas John Hefermehl
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.