| Literature DB >> 31146694 |
Rui Liu1,2, Wenjing Hu3, Xiaoqiang Li4, Danlan Pu5, Gangyi Yang2, Hua Liu6, Minghong Tan7, Danping Zhu8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bone morphogenetic protein9 (BMP9) has been reported to have a role in vascular development. However, there is still a lack of information regarding the association between circulating BMP9 levels and cardiovascular disease in humans. The goal of this study is to measure circulating BMP9 concentrations in patients with essential hypertension (HTN), coronary heart disease (CHD) and HTN + CHD, and evaluates the relationship between circulating BMP9 and these cardiovascular diseases.Entities:
Keywords: BMP9; Cardiovascular disease; Cytokine; Hypertension
Year: 2019 PMID: 31146694 PMCID: PMC6543594 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-019-1095-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
Main clinical features and circulating BMP9 levels in the study population
| Variable | Controls ( | HTN ( | HTN + CHD ( | CHD ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 50.5 ± 11.7 | 51.5 ± 10.8 | 51.9 ± 10.5 | 52.4 ± 10.8 |
| WHR | 0.88 ± 0.08 | 0.90 ± 0.05* | 0.92 ± 0.06* | 0.93 ± 0.05** |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.8 ± 3.4 | 25.1 ± 3.2* | 24.8 ± 3.3* | 23.9 ± 3.1 |
| FAT (%) | 28.7 ± 7.3 | 31.7 ± 7.0** | 31.4 ± 6.9** | 27.1 ± 5.9 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 117.7 ± 13.0 | 147.5 ± 23.1** | 137.8 ± 17.9** | 120.7 ± 10.5 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 74.4 ± 8.9 | 84.4 ± 13.6** | 80.0 ± 10.9** | 73.5 ± 7.3 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 4.52 ± 1.16 | 4.68 ± 0.90 | 4.47 ± 1.21 | 4.43 ± 1.41 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.22 (0.83–1.61) | 1.51 (1.07–1.97)** | 1.51 (1.07–2.54)** | 1.28 (0.92–2.19)** |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 2.74 ± 0.86 | 2.69 ± 0.76 | 2.96 ± 4.11 | 2.57 ± 1.02 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.29 (1.04–1.54) | 1.15 (1.00–1.31) | 1.19 (0.95–1.23) | 1.21 (0.88–1.28) |
| FFA (μmol/L) | 0.53 (0.37–0.64) | 0.56 (0.40–0.76) | 0.41 (0.29–0.58)** | 0.45 (0.33–0.63)** |
| FBG (mmol/L) | 5.28 ± 0.53 | 5.29 ± 0.41 | 5.18 ± 0.45 | 5.18 ± 0.39 |
| FIns (mU/L) | 9.89 (5.38–15.10) | 21.9 (18.4–30.0) ** | 13.7 (7.4–21.5)** | 12.4 (6.5–19.8)** |
| 2 h-BG (mmol/L) | 6.29 ± 1.07 | 6.55 ± 0.84 | 6.62 ± 0.66* | 6.85 ± 1.03* |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.65 ± 0.40 | 5.69 ± 0.39 | 5.73 ± 0.27* | 5.71 ± 0.31* |
| HOMA-IR | 2.45 (1.50–3.60) | 5.04 (4.16–6.83)** | 3.16 (1.61–4.88)** | 2.71 (1.60–4.28)* |
| BMP9 (ng/L) | 123.3 (45.5–178.6) | 53.2 (31.8–62.8) ** | 52.9(27.2–74.7) ** | 55.0 (24.9–71.4)** |
HTN, essential hypertension; CHD, coronary heart disease; WHR, waist hip ratio; BMI, body mass index; FAT%, the percentage of fat in vivo; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, Diastolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyeride; LDL-C, Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, High-density lipoprotein cholesterol; FFA, free fatty acid; FBG, Fasting blood glucose; FIns, fasting insulin; 2 h-BG, 2-hourblood glucose after glucose overload; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance. Data are mean ± SD or median (interquartile range). *Data are mean ± SE, Adjustment for age, gender, BMI. *P < 0.05 or **P < 0.01 compared with controls
Fig. 1Analysis of serum BMP9 by different statistical approaches. a, Circulating BMP9 levels in HTN, CHD and HTN + CHD patients; b, The odds ratio of having HTN in different quartile of BMP9; c, The odds ratio of having CHD in different quartile of BMP9; d, The odds ratio of having HTN + CHD in different quartile of BMP9. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. controls or quartile 4
Linear regression analysis of variables associated with circulating BMP9 levels in the study population
| HTN | HTN + CHD | CHD | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simple | Multiple | Simple | Multiple | Simple | Multiple | |||||||
| Variable | R |
| β |
| R |
| β |
| R |
| β |
|
| Age (yr) | −0.086 | 0.201 | 0.289 | <0.01 | −0.021 | 0.856 | ||||||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.089 | 0.190 | −0.100 | <0.001 | −9.033 | <0.001 | −0.005 | 0.966 | ||||
| WHR | −0.049 | 0.461 | −0.333 | <0.01 | −0.022 | 0.847 | ||||||
| FAT (%) | −0.085 | 0.205 | −0.515 | <0.001 | 0.158 | 0.166 | ||||||
| SBP (mmHg) | −0.219 | 0.006 | −0.004 | <0.001 | − 0.345 | <0.001 | −0.165 | 0.149 | ||||
| DBP (mmHg) | −0.085 | 0.205 | −0.779 | <0.001 | 0.078 | 0.497 | ||||||
| TG (mmol/L) | 0.081 | 0.231 | −0.303 | <0.01 | −0.142 | 0.214 | ||||||
| TC (mmol/L) | 0.066 | 0.330 | 0.054 | 0.621 | 0.026 | 0.820 | ||||||
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | −0.003 | 0.965 | 0.193 | 0.076 | 0.085 | 0.459 | ||||||
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 0.140 | 0.341 | 0.092 | 0.397 | 0.156 | 0.173 | ||||||
| FFA (mmol/L) | 0.136 | 0.012 | 0.203 | <0.001 | 0.634 | <0.001 | 0.114 | <0.001 | 0.158 | 0.166 | ||
| FBG (mmol/L) | 0.118 | 0.076 | −0.096 | 0.379 | −0.232 | < 0.05 | ||||||
| 2 h-BG (mmol/L) | −0.134 | 0.051 | 0.009 | 0.938 | −0.10 | < 0.01 | −7.394 | <0.05 | ||||
| FIns (mU/L) | −0.148 | 0.015 | 0.211 | 0.052 | 0.120 | 0.297 | ||||||
| HbA1c(%) | −0.567 | 0.234 | 0.017 | 0.873 | −0.030 | 0.792 | ||||||
| HOMA-IR | −0.135 | 0.030 | 0.195 | 0.073 | 0.138 | 0.228 | ||||||
In multiple linear regression analysis, values included for analysis were age, sex, BMI, WHR, FAT, TG, HDL,TC,HOMA-IR,2 h-BG, FFA. aLog transformed before analysis
Association of circulating BMP9 with HTN and CHD in fully adjusted models
| HTN | HTN + CHD | CHD | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95%CI | OR | 95%CI | OR | 95%CI | ||||
| Model 1 | 0.983 | 0.978–0.989 | <0.001 | 0.984 | 0.976–0.992 | <0.001 | 0.988 | 0.981–0.996 | <0.01 |
| Model 2 | 0.983 | 0.978–0.989 | <0.001 | 0.987 | 0.979–0.995 | <0.001 | 0.988 | 0.980–0.996 | <0.01 |
| Model 3 | 0.983 | 0.978–0.989 | <0.001 | 0.990 | 0.982–0.998 | <0.05 | 0.988 | 0.980–0.996 | <0.01 |
| Model 4 | 0.985 | 0.978–0.991 | <0.001 | 0.984 | 0.974–0.994 | <0.001 | 0.987 | 0.979–0.995 | <0.01 |
Model1, adjusted age, gender; Model2, adjusted age, gender, WHR; Model3, adjusted age, gender, WHR BMI, FAT, FBG; Model 4, adjusted age, gender, WHR BMI, FAT, FBG, lipid profile. Results of multivariate logistic regression analysis are presented as the odds ratio (OR) of being in HTN, HTN + CHD and CHD status increase in circulating BMP9
Row mean scores differ and Cochran-Armitage trend analysis of the impact of circulating BMP9 levels on HTN and CHD
| HTN | HTN + CHD | CHD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model adjusted |
|
|
| |||
| Row Mean Scores Test | 55.260 | <0.001 | 7.451 | <0.01 | 5.275 | <0.05 |
| Cochran-Armitage Trend Test | 3.6421 | <0.001 | 2.736 | <0.01 | 2.303 | <0.05 |
Values shown are cut-offs of circulating BMP9 levels of all subjects. Adjusted for age, sex, BMI, WHR, blood pressure, TG, TC, LDL-C and HDL-C
Fig. 2ROC curve analysis was performed for the prediction of CHD