AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to find if the relation between insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function assessed from fasting and OGTT measurements has a physiological shape (hyperbolic with the reference methods). METHODS: Healthy women without diabetic first-degree relatives underwent a 75 g OGTT with plasma glucose and insulin (n = 35) concentrations being measured at 0, 30, 60 and 120 min. Beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity were estimated using previously described indices from fasting (1 for beta-cell function, 6 for insulin sensitivity) and OGTT measurements (3 for beta-cell function and 5 for insulin sensitivity). A hyperbolic relation was tested for the 21 beta-cell function-insulin sensitivity pairs using a non-lineal regression method. RESULTS: The assessment of beta-cell function from OGTT was impossible in seven women and one had outlier indices. For the remaining 27 women, only 8 combinations adjusted to a hyperbolic relation. The best adjustment was achieved using the fasting glucose to insulin ratio as the estimation of insulin sensitivity and the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index (single fasting sample) as the estimation of beta-cell function (r2 0.802, k 869.71, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION/ INTERPRETATION: In this group of healthy women, the estimation of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function by most methods using OGTT-derived glucose and insulin measurements did not adjust to a hyperbolic relation but all fasting indices combinations did. Beta-cell function estimated with the HOMA index and insulin sensitivity with fasting glucose to insulin ratio had the best adjustment.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to find if the relation between insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function assessed from fasting and OGTT measurements has a physiological shape (hyperbolic with the reference methods). METHODS: Healthy women without diabetic first-degree relatives underwent a 75 g OGTT with plasma glucose and insulin (n = 35) concentrations being measured at 0, 30, 60 and 120 min. Beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity were estimated using previously described indices from fasting (1 for beta-cell function, 6 for insulin sensitivity) and OGTT measurements (3 for beta-cell function and 5 for insulin sensitivity). A hyperbolic relation was tested for the 21 beta-cell function-insulin sensitivity pairs using a non-lineal regression method. RESULTS: The assessment of beta-cell function from OGTT was impossible in seven women and one had outlier indices. For the remaining 27 women, only 8 combinations adjusted to a hyperbolic relation. The best adjustment was achieved using the fasting glucose to insulin ratio as the estimation of insulin sensitivity and the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index (single fasting sample) as the estimation of beta-cell function (r2 0.802, k 869.71, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION/ INTERPRETATION: In this group of healthy women, the estimation of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function by most methods using OGTT-derived glucose and insulin measurements did not adjust to a hyperbolic relation but all fasting indices combinations did. Beta-cell function estimated with the HOMA index and insulin sensitivity with fasting glucose to insulin ratio had the best adjustment.
Authors: Elena Rodríguez-Rodríguez; Carolina Palmeros-Exsome; Ana M López-Sobaler; Rosa M Ortega Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2010-07-31 Impact factor: 3.183
Authors: Katrin Hücking; Richard M Watanabe; Darko Stefanovski; Richard N Bergman Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2008-07-10 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Ji A Seo; Min-Cheol Kang; Theodore P Ciaraldi; Sang Soo Kim; Kyong Soo Park; Charles Choe; Won Min Hwang; Dong Mee Lim; Olivia Farr; Christos Mantzoros; Robert R Henry; Young-Bum Kim Journal: Metabolism Date: 2017-10-03 Impact factor: 8.694
Authors: Titta Salopuro; Leena Pulkkinen; Jaana Lindström; Marjukka Kolehmainen; Anna-Maija Tolppanen; Johan G Eriksson; Timo T Valle; Sirkka Aunola; Pirjo Ilanne-Parikka; Sirkka Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Markku Laakso; Matti Uusitupa Journal: BMC Med Genet Date: 2009-09-21 Impact factor: 2.103