| Literature DB >> 31146277 |
Deepti Beekoo1, Kaiming Yuan1, Shuyang Dai1, Lifen Chen1, Meiqin Di1, Sicong Wang1, Huacheng Liu2, Wangning ShangGuan1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies have reported that BIS is unreliable in children because its algorithm provides misleading information about the actual depth of anesthesia. Raw EEG analysis provides direct neurophysiologic measurement of cerebral activity. The relationship between age and EEG has rarely been reported, thus the aim of the present study was to compare raw electroencephalography (EEG) among different age groups of surgical patients under general anesthesia with 1.0 MAC sevoflurane. MATERIAL AND METHODS We enrolled 135 patients aged 0-80 years old (ASA physical status I or II) undergoing surgery, who were divided into 6 groups: 1-12 months old (group 1), 1-3 years old (group 2), 3-6 years old (group 3), 6-18 years old (group 4), 18-65 years old (group 5), and 65-80 years old (group 6). Different raw EEG waves (alpha, delta, and theta) were compared for all subjects. RESULTS The BIS values in groups 1 to 6 were 52.2±12.7, 55.0±8.0, 44.5±7.3, 43.8±7.3, 44.2±6.2, and 49.1±6.2 respectively. Compared with groups 1 and 2 (52.2±12.7, 55.0±8.0), BIS values of groups 3, 4, and 5 (44.5±7.3, 43.8±7.3, 44.2±6.2, respectively) were lower (P<0.05). Theta frequency was observed in the 6 groups. The EEG frequencies in groups 1 to 6 were 6.0 (5.5-6.0), 6.0 (5.5-6.0), 6.0 (5.5-6.0), 6.0 (6.0-7.0), 6.3 (6.0-7.0), and 6.0 (5.1-6.0), respectively. Compared with group 6, EEG frequencies in groups 4 and 5 were higher (P<0.05). BIS value was significantly correlated with EEG frequency (R²=0.063, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS Analyzing raw EEG waves provides more accurate judgement of depth of anesthesia, especially in pediatric cases in which monitors often provide misleading values.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31146277 PMCID: PMC6559006 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.915640
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Figure 1Flow chart of the study.
Patient data and clinical characteristics (n=20).
| Variables | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | Group 5 | Group 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yrs) | 0.6±0.3 | 1.3±0.5 | 4.6±0.9 | 9.5±1.8 | 44.7±11.9 | 70.7±3.9 |
| Sex (M/F) | 12/8 | 16/4 | 15/5 | 16/4 | 8/12 | 11/9 |
| Weight (kg) | 8.5±2.3 | 11.6±2.0 | 20.4±5.1 | 32.6±8.5 | 63.0±11.5 | 61.6±8.3 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 17.7±2.4 | 16.9±2.3 | 16.2±3.8 | 17.2±3.1 | 23.8±3.2 | 23.6±1.9 |
Figure 2Heart rate among the 6 groups at different time points.
Figure 3Mean arterial pressure among the 6 groups at different time points.
Figure 4Dynamic changes of BIS values at each minute of observation. Compared with groups 1 and 2, the average BIS values of groups 3, 4, and 5 were lower (* P<0.05).
Values of EEG Frequency, BIS, and Et SEV among the 6 groups (n=20).
| Variable | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | Group 5 | Group 6 | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEG Frequency/Hz | 6.0 (5.5–6.0) | 6.0 (5.5–6.0) | 6.0 (5.5–6.0) | 6.0 | 6.3 | 6.0 (5.1–6.0) | 0.0013 |
| BIS value | 52.2±12.7 | 55.0±8.0 | 44.5±7.5 | 43.8±7.3 | 44.2±6.2 | 49.1±4.2 | 0.000013 |
Data are expressed as mean ±SD or median (interquartile range 25–75), one-way ANOVA, or Kruskal-Wallis H test. Compared with Group 6,
P<0.05; compared with Group 1,
P<0.05; compared with Group 2,
P<0.05.
Figure 5Dynamic changes of EEG frequency at different time points. Compared with group 6, the median EEG frequencies in groups 4 and 5 were higher (* P<0.05).