Literature DB >> 31146073

Benefits of deep learning for delineation of organs at risk in head and neck cancer.

J van der Veen1, S Willems2, S Deschuymer1, D Robben3, W Crijns1, F Maes2, S Nuyts4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/
OBJECTIVE: Precise delineation of organs at risk (OARs) in head and neck cancer (HNC) is necessary for accurate radiotherapy. Although guidelines exist, significant interobserver variability (IOV) remains. The aim was to validate a 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) for semi-automated delineation of OARs with respect to delineation accuracy, efficiency and consistency compared to manual delineation. MATERIAL/
METHODS: 16 OARs were manually delineated in 15 new HNC patients by two trained radiation oncologists (RO) independently, using international consensus guidelines. OARs were also automatically delineated by applying the CNN and corrected as needed by both ROs separately. Both delineations were performed two weeks apart and blinded to each other. IOV between both ROs was quantified using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and average symmetric surface distance (ASSD). To objectify network accuracy, differences between automated and corrected delineations were calculated using the same similarity measures.
RESULTS: Average correction time of the automated delineation was 33% shorter than manual delineation (23 vs 34 minutes) (p < 10-6). IOV improved significantly with network initialisation for nearly all OARs (p < 0.05), resulting in decreased ASSD averaged over all OARs from 1.9 to 1.2 mm. The network achieved an accuracy of 90% and 84% DSC averaged over all OARs for RO1 and RO2 respectively, with an ASSD of 0.7 and 1.5 mm, which was in 93% and 73% of the cases lower than the IOV.
CONCLUSION: The CNN developed for automated OAR delineation in HNC was shown to be more efficient and consistent compared to manual delineation, which justify its implementation in clinical practice.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delineation; Head and neck neoplasms; Neural networks (computer); Observer variation; Organs at risk; Radiotherapy

Year:  2019        PMID: 31146073     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  23 in total

1.  General and custom deep learning autosegmentation models for organs in head and neck, abdomen, and male pelvis.

Authors:  Asma Amjad; Jiaofeng Xu; Dan Thill; Colleen Lawton; William Hall; Musaddiq J Awan; Monica Shukla; Beth A Erickson; X Allen Li
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  The use of deep learning technology for the detection of optic neuropathy.

Authors:  Mei Li; Chao Wan
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-03

3.  Impact of random outliers in auto-segmented targets on radiotherapy treatment plans for glioblastoma.

Authors:  Robert Poel; Elias Rüfenacht; Ekin Ermis; Michael Müller; Michael K Fix; Daniel M Aebersold; Peter Manser; Mauricio Reyes
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 4.309

4.  Efficacy evaluation of 2D, 3D U-Net semantic segmentation and atlas-based segmentation of normal lungs excluding the trachea and main bronchi.

Authors:  Takafumi Nemoto; Natsumi Futakami; Masamichi Yagi; Atsuhiro Kumabe; Atsuya Takeda; Etsuo Kunieda; Naoyuki Shigematsu
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Inter-observer agreement of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging on gross tumor volume delineation of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an initial study.

Authors:  Nan Zhou; Anning Hu; Zhihao Shi; Xiaolu Wang; Qiongjie Zhu; Qun Zhou; Jun Ma; Feng Zhao; Weiwei Kong; Jian He
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-02

6.  External validation of deep learning-based contouring of head and neck organs at risk.

Authors:  Ellen J L Brunenberg; Isabell K Steinseifer; Sven van den Bosch; Johannes H A M Kaanders; Charlotte L Brouwer; Mark J Gooding; Wouter van Elmpt; René Monshouwer
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-07-10

Review 7.  Metrics to evaluate the performance of auto-segmentation for radiation treatment planning: A critical review.

Authors:  Michael V Sherer; Diana Lin; Sharif Elguindi; Simon Duke; Li-Tee Tan; Jon Cacicedo; Max Dahele; Erin F Gillespie
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 6.901

8.  Convolutional neural networks for head and neck tumor segmentation on 7-channel multiparametric MRI: a leave-one-out analysis.

Authors:  Lars Bielak; Nicole Wiedenmann; Arnie Berlin; Nils Henrik Nicolay; Deepa Darshini Gunashekar; Leonard Hägele; Thomas Lottner; Anca-Ligia Grosu; Michael Bock
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Interobserver variability in organ at risk delineation in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  J van der Veen; A Gulyban; S Willems; F Maes; S Nuyts
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  The dosimetric impact of deep learning-based auto-segmentation of organs at risk on nasopharyngeal and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Hongbo Guo; Jiazhou Wang; Xiang Xia; Yang Zhong; Jiayuan Peng; Zhen Zhang; Weigang Hu
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.