Sherry H-Y Chou1, R Loch Macdonald2,3,4, Emanuela Keller5. 1. Departments of Critical Care Medicine, Neurology, and Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3550 Terrace Street Suite 646, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA. chouh@upmc.edu. 2. Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 3. Labatt Family Centre of Excellence in Brain Injury and Trauma Research, Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Research, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada. 4. Departments of Physiology and Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 5. Neurocritical Care Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Development of clinical biomarkers to guide therapy is an important unmet need in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). A wide spectrum of plausible biomarkers has been reported for SAH, but none have been validated due to significant variabilities in study design, methodology, laboratory techniques, and outcome endpoints. METHODS: A systematic review of SAH biomarkers was performed per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The panel's recommendations focused on harmonization of (1) target cellular and molecular biomarkers for future investigation in SAH, (2) standardization of best-practice procedures in biospecimen and biomarker studies, and (3) experimental method reporting requirements to facilitate meta-analyses and future validation of putative biomarkers. RESULTS: No cellular or molecular biomarker has been validated for inclusion as "core" recommendation. Fifty-four studies met inclusion criteria and generated 33 supplemental and emerging biomarker targets. Core recommendations include best-practice protocols for biospecimen collection and handling as well as standardized reporting guidelines to capture the heterogeneity and variabilities in experimental methodologies and biomarker analyses platforms. CONCLUSION: Significant variabilities in study design, methodology, laboratory techniques, and outcome endpoints exist in SAH biomarker studies and present significant barriers toward validation and translation of putative biomarkers to clinical use. Adaptation of common data elements, recommended biospecimen protocols, and reporting guidelines will reduce heterogeneity and facilitate future meta-analyses and development of validated clinical biomarkers in SAH.
INTRODUCTION: Development of clinical biomarkers to guide therapy is an important unmet need in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). A wide spectrum of plausible biomarkers has been reported for SAH, but none have been validated due to significant variabilities in study design, methodology, laboratory techniques, and outcome endpoints. METHODS: A systematic review of SAH biomarkers was performed per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The panel's recommendations focused on harmonization of (1) target cellular and molecular biomarkers for future investigation in SAH, (2) standardization of best-practice procedures in biospecimen and biomarker studies, and (3) experimental method reporting requirements to facilitate meta-analyses and future validation of putative biomarkers. RESULTS: No cellular or molecular biomarker has been validated for inclusion as "core" recommendation. Fifty-four studies met inclusion criteria and generated 33 supplemental and emerging biomarker targets. Core recommendations include best-practice protocols for biospecimen collection and handling as well as standardized reporting guidelines to capture the heterogeneity and variabilities in experimental methodologies and biomarker analyses platforms. CONCLUSION: Significant variabilities in study design, methodology, laboratory techniques, and outcome endpoints exist in SAH biomarker studies and present significant barriers toward validation and translation of putative biomarkers to clinical use. Adaptation of common data elements, recommended biospecimen protocols, and reporting guidelines will reduce heterogeneity and facilitate future meta-analyses and development of validated clinical biomarkers in SAH.
Entities:
Keywords:
Apolipoprotein E; B-type natriuretic peptide, common data elements; Biomarkers; Biospecimens; Cardiac troponin I; Cerebrospinal fluid; Plasma-type gelsolin; S100β; Standard operating procedure; Subarachnoid hemorrhage; Tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-6, metalloproteinase-9
Authors: Jeffrey L Saver; Steven Warach; Scott Janis; Joanne Odenkirchen; Kyra Becker; Oscar Benavente; Joseph Broderick; Alexander W Dromerick; Pamela Duncan; Mitchell S V Elkind; Karen Johnston; Chelsea S Kidwell; James F Meschia; Lee Schwamm Journal: Stroke Date: 2012-02-02 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Andrew I R Maas; Cynthia L Harrison-Felix; David Menon; P David Adelson; Tom Balkin; Ross Bullock; Doortje C Engel; Wayne Gordon; Jean Langlois-Orman; Henry L Lew; Claudia Robertson; Nancy Temkin; Alex Valadka; Mieke Verfaellie; Mark Wainwright; David W Wright; Karen Schwab Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2011-02-05 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Amy K Wagner; Dianxu Ren; Yvette P Conley; Xiecheng Ma; Mary E Kerr; Ross D Zafonte; Ava M Puccio; Donald W Marion; C Edward Dixon Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Steven M Teutsch; Linda A Bradley; Glenn E Palomaki; James E Haddow; Margaret Piper; Ned Calonge; W David Dotson; Michael P Douglas; Alfred O Berg Journal: Genet Med Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Fang Yu; Aisha Saand; Changhong Xing; Jong Woo Lee; Liangge Hsu; Octavia P Palmer; Vanessa Jackson; Lu Tang; MingMing Ning; Rose Du; Patrick M Kochanek; Eng H Lo; Sherry H-Y Chou Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2021-05-05 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Jennifer Frontera; Shraddha Mainali; Molly McNett; Sherry H-Y Chou; Ericka L Fink; Courtney L Robertson; Michelle Schober; Wendy Ziai; David Menon; Patrick M Kochanek; Jose I Suarez; Raimund Helbok Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 3.532
Authors: Jan Claassen; Yama Akbari; Sheila Alexander; Mary Kay Bader; Kathleen Bell; Thomas P Bleck; Melanie Boly; Jeremy Brown; Sherry H-Y Chou; Michael N Diringer; Brian L Edlow; Brandon Foreman; Joseph T Giacino; Olivia Gosseries; Theresa Green; David M Greer; Daniel F Hanley; Jed A Hartings; Raimund Helbok; J Claude Hemphill; H E Hinson; Karen Hirsch; Theresa Human; Michael L James; Nerissa Ko; Daniel Kondziella; Sarah Livesay; Lori K Madden; Shraddha Mainali; Stephan A Mayer; Victoria McCredie; Molly M McNett; Geert Meyfroidt; Martin M Monti; Susanne Muehlschlegel; Santosh Murthy; Paul Nyquist; DaiWai M Olson; J Javier Provencio; Eric Rosenthal; Gisele Sampaio Silva; Simone Sarasso; Nicholas D Schiff; Tarek Sharshar; Lori Shutter; Robert D Stevens; Paul Vespa; Walter Videtta; Amy Wagner; Wendy Ziai; John Whyte; Elizabeth Zink; Jose I Suarez Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2021-07-08 Impact factor: 3.210