| Literature DB >> 31143016 |
Rajasekar Balaji1, Meena Ramanathan2, Ananda Balayogi Bhavanani2, Pajanivel Ranganadin3, Karthik Balachandran4.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Recent studies provide ample evidence of the benefits of yoga in various chronic disorders. Diabetes mellitus is a group of metabolic diseases characterized by chronic hyperglycemia and Sandler coined the term "Diabetic Lung" for the abnormal pulmonary function detected in diabetic patients due underlying pulmonary dysfunction. Yoga therapy may help in achieving better pulmonary function along with enhanced glycaemic control and overall health benefits. AIM: To study the effect of adjuvant yoga therapy in diabetic lung through spirometry. SETTINGS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Diabetic lung; PFT; hathenas; yoga therapy
Year: 2019 PMID: 31143016 PMCID: PMC6521747 DOI: 10.4103/ijoy.IJOY_20_18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Yoga ISSN: 0973-6131
Yoga practices (given thrice a week for 4 months) and their duration
| Yoga practices | Duration (min) |
|---|---|
| 30 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 15 |
Figure 1Hathenas: a series of 15 techniques of Gitananda Yoga tradition designed to consciously enhance flow of prana into different parts of the lungs
Comparison of pre, post, delta, and delta% of height, weight, body mass index, forced expiratory volume in 1st s, forced vital capacity, and their ratio (forced expiratory volume in 1st s/forced vital capacity) in yoga and control groups before and after 4 months’ study period
| Height | Weight | BMI | FEV1 | FVC | FEV1/FVC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yoga group | ||||||
| Pre | 161.64±8.31 | 68.41±12.48 | 26.16±4.00 | 1.79±0.57 | 2.43±1.18 | 76.02±12.02 |
| Post | 161.58±8.32 | 64.4±11.60*** | 24.61±3.64*** | 2.34±0.79*** | 2.95±1.25*** | 78.8±17.45 |
| Delta | −0.05±0.24 | −4.01±1.50 | −1.55±0.63 | 0.54±0.77 | 0.52±1.06 | 2.77±14.01 |
| Delta% | −0.01±0.01 | −0.06±0.01 | −0.06±0.02 | 0.40±0.57 | 0.33±0.59 | 0.04±0.18 |
| Control group | ||||||
| Pre | 161.4±9.90 | 69.4±13.54 | 26.54±3.68 | 1.77±0.53 | 2.15±0.63 | 77.50±8.94 |
| Post | 161.3±9.98 | 69.8±13.89 | 26.67±3.58 | 1.82±0.54 | 2.30±0.78* | 75.99±9.37* |
| Delta | −0.02±0.17 | 0.42±2.05 | 0.12±0.75 | 0.04±0.18 | 0.13±0.35 | −1.51±3.49 |
| Delta% | −0.01±0.01 | 0.01±0.03 | 0.01±0.03 | 0.03±0.10 | 0.07±0.15 | −0.02±0.05 |
| Pre | 0.911 | 0.754 | 0.678 | 0.889 | 0.251 | 0.561 |
| Post | 0.922 | 0.854 | 0.021 | 0.003 | 0.016 | 0.407 |
| Delta | 0.541 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.042 | 0.083 |
| Delta% | 0.516 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.022 | 0.062 |
Values are given as mean±SD. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 by Student’s paired t-test for intragroup comparisons and actual P values given for intergroup comparison by Student’s unpaired t-test. BMI=Body mass index, FEV1=Forced expiratory volume in 1st s, FVC=Forced vital capacity, SD=Standard deviation
Figure 2Scatter diagram comparing delta% of forced expiratory volume in 1st s between yoga and control groups
Figure 4Scatter diagram comparing delta% of forced expiratory volume in 1st s/forced vital capacity between yoga and control groups