Literature DB >> 31142647

Human cGAS catalytic domain has an additional DNA-binding interface that enhances enzymatic activity and liquid-phase condensation.

Wei Xie1, Lodoe Lama2, Carolina Adura3, Daisuke Tomita4, J Fraser Glickman3, Thomas Tuschl2, Dinshaw J Patel1.   

Abstract

The cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS)-cGAMP-STING pathway plays a key role in innate immunity, with cGAS sensing both pathogenic and mislocalized DNA in the cytoplasm. Human cGAS (h-cGAS) constitutes an important drug target for control of antiinflammatory responses that can contribute to the onset of autoimmune diseases. Recent studies have established that the positively charged N-terminal segment of cGAS contributes to enhancement of cGAS enzymatic activity as a result of DNA-induced liquid-phase condensation. We have identified an additional cGASCD-DNA interface (labeled site-C; CD, catalytic domain) in the crystal structure of a human SRY.cGASCD-DNA complex, with mutations along this basic site-C cGAS interface disrupting liquid-phase condensation, as monitored by cGAMP formation, gel shift, spin-down, and turbidity assays, as well as time-lapse imaging of liquid droplet formation. We expand on an earlier ladder model of cGAS dimers bound to a pair of parallel-aligned DNAs to propose a multivalent interaction-mediated cluster model to account for DNA-mediated condensation involving both the N-terminal domain of cGAS and the site-C cGAS-DNA interface. We also report the crystal structure of the h-cGASCD-DNA complex containing a triple mutant that disrupts the site-C interface, with this complex serving as a future platform for guiding cGAS inhibitor development at the DNA-bound h-cGAS level. Finally, we solved the structure of RU.521 bound in two alternate alignments to apo h-cGASCD, thereby occupying more of the catalytic pocket and providing insights into further optimization of active-site-binding inhibitors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA-binding cGAS mutations; h-cGAS–DNA complex; liquid-phase condensation; multivalent interactions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31142647      PMCID: PMC6575157          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1905013116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  48 in total

1.  Cyclic GMP-AMP is an endogenous second messenger in innate immune signaling by cytosolic DNA.

Authors:  Jiaxi Wu; Lijun Sun; Xiang Chen; Fenghe Du; Heping Shi; Chuo Chen; Zhijian J Chen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase is a cytosolic DNA sensor that activates the type I interferon pathway.

Authors:  Lijun Sun; Jiaxi Wu; Fenghe Du; Xiang Chen; Zhijian J Chen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Structure of human cGAS reveals a conserved family of second-messenger enzymes in innate immunity.

Authors:  Philip J Kranzusch; Amy Si-Ying Lee; James M Berger; Jennifer A Doudna
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 9.423

4.  The innate immune DNA sensor cGAS produces a noncanonical cyclic dinucleotide that activates human STING.

Authors:  Elie J Diner; Dara L Burdette; Stephen C Wilson; Kathryn M Monroe; Colleen A Kellenberger; Mamoru Hyodo; Yoshihiro Hayakawa; Ming C Hammond; Russell E Vance
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 9.423

5.  Cyclic [G(2',5')pA(3',5')p] is the metazoan second messenger produced by DNA-activated cyclic GMP-AMP synthase.

Authors:  Pu Gao; Manuel Ascano; Yang Wu; Winfried Barchet; Barbara L Gaffney; Thomas Zillinger; Artem A Serganov; Yizhou Liu; Roger A Jones; Gunther Hartmann; Thomas Tuschl; Dinshaw J Patel
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data.

Authors:  Ethan Cerami; Jianjiong Gao; Ugur Dogrusoz; Benjamin E Gross; Selcuk Onur Sumer; Bülent Arman Aksoy; Anders Jacobsen; Caitlin J Byrne; Michael L Heuer; Erik Larsson; Yevgeniy Antipin; Boris Reva; Arthur P Goldberg; Chris Sander; Nikolaus Schultz
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 39.397

7.  Structure of a complex of tandem HMG boxes and DNA.

Authors:  Katherine Stott; George S F Tang; Keng-Boon Lee; Jean O Thomas
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Phase transitions in the assembly of multivalent signalling proteins.

Authors:  Pilong Li; Sudeep Banjade; Hui-Chun Cheng; Soyeon Kim; Baoyu Chen; Liang Guo; Marc Llaguno; Javoris V Hollingsworth; David S King; Salman F Banani; Paul S Russo; Qiu-Xing Jiang; B Tracy Nixon; Michael K Rosen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  cGAS produces a 2'-5'-linked cyclic dinucleotide second messenger that activates STING.

Authors:  Andrea Ablasser; Marion Goldeck; Taner Cavlar; Tobias Deimling; Gregor Witte; Ingo Röhl; Karl-Peter Hopfner; Janos Ludwig; Veit Hornung
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Structural mechanism of cytosolic DNA sensing by cGAS.

Authors:  Filiz Civril; Tobias Deimling; Carina C de Oliveira Mann; Andrea Ablasser; Manuela Moldt; Gregor Witte; Veit Hornung; Karl-Peter Hopfner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  44 in total

1.  Keeping innate immune response in check: when cGAS meets the nucleosome.

Authors:  Wei Xie; Dinshaw J Patel
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 25.617

Review 2.  Protein phase separation: A novel therapy for cancer?

Authors:  Wei Wang; Yingqian Chen; Aixiao Xu; Minyi Cai; Ji Cao; Hong Zhu; Bo Yang; Xuejing Shao; Meidan Ying; Qiaojun He
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Structural basis of nucleosome-dependent cGAS inhibition.

Authors:  Joshua A Boyer; Cathy J Spangler; Joshua D Strauss; Andrew P Cesmat; Pengda Liu; Robert K McGinty; Qi Zhang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Structural basis for sequestration and autoinhibition of cGAS by chromatin.

Authors:  Sebastian Michalski; Carina C de Oliveira Mann; Che A Stafford; Gregor Witte; Joseph Bartho; Katja Lammens; Veit Hornung; Karl-Peter Hopfner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Structural basis for the inhibition of cGAS by nucleosomes.

Authors:  Tomoya Kujirai; Christian Zierhut; Yoshimasa Takizawa; Ryan Kim; Lumi Negishi; Nobuki Uruma; Seiya Hirai; Hironori Funabiki; Hitoshi Kurumizaka
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Structural basis for nucleosome-mediated inhibition of cGAS activity.

Authors:  Duanfang Cao; Xiaonan Han; Xiaoyi Fan; Rui-Ming Xu; Xinzheng Zhang
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 25.617

Review 7.  Cyclic dinucleotides at the forefront of innate immunity.

Authors:  Shivam A Zaver; Joshua J Woodward
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 8.382

Review 8.  Regulation and Consequences of cGAS Activation by Self-DNA.

Authors:  Christian Zierhut; Hironori Funabiki
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 20.808

Review 9.  Regulation of cGAS- and RLR-mediated immunity to nucleic acids.

Authors:  Andrea Ablasser; Sun Hur
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 25.606

10.  Structural mechanism of cGAS inhibition by the nucleosome.

Authors:  Ganesh R Pathare; Alexiane Decout; Selene Glück; Simone Cavadini; Kristina Makasheva; Ruud Hovius; Georg Kempf; Joscha Weiss; Zuzanna Kozicka; Baptiste Guey; Pauline Melenec; Beat Fierz; Nicolas H Thomä; Andrea Ablasser
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.