Literature DB >> 31140199

Accuracy of School Staff-Measured Height and Weight Used for Body Mass Index Screening and Reporting.

Hannah R Thompson1, Jennifer K Linchey2, Benjamin King2, John H Himes3, Kristine A Madsen2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of students' heights and weights measured by school staff for body mass index (BMI) screening/reporting has not been established. This study examined school staffs' measurement accuracy, comparing accuracy by staff- and student-level characteristics.
METHODS: School staff and researchers measured the height and weight of 1008 4th-8th grade students, within 1 month of each other. Bland-Altman plots, mean differences, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to examine measurement accuracy. Linear mixed effects models assessed accuracy by staff- and student-level characteristics.
RESULTS: Bland-Altman plots revealed no appreciable bias in differences between researcher and staff measurements. The mean absolute difference between researcher and school staff measurements were 1.0 ± 1.6 cm (height), 0.7 ± 1.8 kg (weight), and 0.4 ± 0.8 kg/m2 (BMI). Inter-rater ICC values were ≥0.97, demonstrating "excellent" reliability. Categorical weight status was correctly classified for 94% of students (kappa 0.90), and for 96% with a BMI ≥95th% (kappa 0.94). Physical education (PE) teachers were slightly less accurate than school nurses in measuring height (0.4 cm less accurate; p = .045) and weight (0.4 kg; p = .015).
CONCLUSIONS: School staff conducted height/weight measurements on 4th-8th grade students with high accuracy. Resultant school-based BMI reports using similar protocols should validly reflect weight status for almost all students.
© 2019, American School Health Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  body mass index (BMI); measurement; physical education teachers; school nurses; screening and reporting

Year:  2019        PMID: 31140199      PMCID: PMC6822678          DOI: 10.1111/josh.12788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sch Health        ISSN: 0022-4391            Impact factor:   2.118


  15 in total

1.  Reliability and validity of the FITNESSGRAM: quality of teacher-collected health-related fitness surveillance data.

Authors:  James R Morrow; Scott B Martin; Allen W Jackson
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 2.  BMI screening in schools: helpful or harmful.

Authors:  Joanne P Ikeda; Patricia B Crawford; Gail Woodward-Lopez
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2006-11-08

3.  The Massachusetts school-based body mass index experiment: gleaning implementation lessons for future childhood obesity reduction efforts.

Authors:  Fatima Cody Stanford; Elsie M Taveras
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 5.002

Review 4.  A comprehensive review of school-based body mass index screening programs and their implications for school health: do the controversies accurately reflect the research?

Authors:  Dominique G Ruggieri; Sarah B Bass
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.118

5.  The Fit Study: Design and rationale for a cluster randomized trial of school-based BMI screening and reporting.

Authors:  Kristine A Madsen; Jennifer Linchey; Lorrene Ritchie; Hannah R Thompson
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  Reliability of height and weight measurements collected by physical education teachers for a school-based body mass index surveillance and screening system.

Authors:  Stephanie S Berkson; Janice Espinola; Katherine A Corso; Howard Cabral; Robert McGowan; Virginia R Chomitz
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.118

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Physical activity, sports participation, and suicidal behavior among college students.

Authors:  David R Brown; Curtis J Blanton
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Ethnic Disparities in Trends in High BMI Among California Adolescents, 2003-2012.

Authors:  Jennifer Falbe; Carolyn Cotterman; Jennifer Linchey; Kristine A Madsen
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Critical Elements of a School Report to Parents on Body Mass Index.

Authors:  Hannah R Thompson; Jennifer K Linchey; Kristine A Madsen
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  5 in total

1.  Impact of Weight Status Reporting on Childhood Body Mass Index.

Authors:  Bongkyun Kim; Michael R Thomsen; Rodolfo M Nayga; Di Fang; Anthony Goudie
Journal:  Child Obes       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 2.867

2.  BMI Data Collection and Communication Practices in a Multistate Sample of Head Start Programs.

Authors:  Alison Tovar; M Elizabeth Miller; Virginia C Stage; Jessica A Hoffman; Emily Hill Guseman; Susan Sisson; Dana Shefet; Sara E Bejamin-Neelon; Taren Swindle; Saima Hasnin; Marco Beltran
Journal:  Child Obes       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 2.867

3.  Has the double burden of malnutrition reached pupils in rural western Kenya?

Authors:  Rie Takeuchi; Doris W Njomo; Sammy M Njenga; Sachi Tomokawa; Alex Mutua; Haruki Kazama; Barnett Walema; Takeshi Akiyama; Takashi Asakura; Yasuhiko Kamiya; Jun Kobayashi
Journal:  Pediatr Int       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 1.617

4.  Weight Measurements in School: Setting and Student Comfort.

Authors:  Emily Altman; Jennifer Linchey; Gabriel Santamaria; Hannah R Thompson; Kristine A Madsen
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 2.822

5.  The association between student body mass index and tests of flexibility assessed by the FITNESSGRAM®: New York City public school students, 2017-18.

Authors:  Hannah R Thompson; Andjelka Pavlovic; Emily D'Agostino; Melanie D Napier; Kevin Konty; Sophia E Day
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.