Literature DB >> 31140146

Effects of Social Support Source and Effectiveness on Stress Buffering After Stem Cell Transplant.

Marjorie Margolis1,2, Jane Austin3, Lisa Wu4, Heiddis Valdimarsdottir5,6, Annette L Stanton7, Scott D Rowley8,9, Pashna M Munshi9, Christine Rini8,9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study used the social support effectiveness framework to examine whether effective social support buffered the relationship between stressful life events and distress among hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) survivors and whether that buffering effect depended on the type of caregiver who provided it (partner versus non-partner caregivers).
METHODS: A total of 275 HSCT survivors completed measures of the effectiveness of their caregiver's support-social support effectiveness (SSE)-distress, and stressful life events. Hierarchical linear regression was used to analyze a three-way interaction between stressful life events, caregiver SSE, and caregiver type on distress.
RESULTS: After controlling for covariates, the three-way interaction of stressful life events, caregiver SSE, and caregiver type was significant (b = - 0.21, SE = 0.00, p < 0.001). Among partnered survivors, more stressful life events were associated with greater distress (B = 0.03, SE = 0.01, p = 0.045) when caregiver SSE was low. There was no association between stressful life events and distress when caregiver SSE was average (B = 0.01, SE = 0.01, p = 0.50) or high (B = - 0.01, SE = 0.02, p = 0.61). Among non-partnered survivors, there was a positive association between stressful life events and distress regardless of caregiver SSE.
CONCLUSIONS: Average or highly effective caregiver support buffered effects of stressful life events on distress among partnered survivors. There was no evidence that support at any level of effectiveness buffered stressful life events among non-partnered survivors. Findings highlight the importance of measuring social support effectiveness and source of support among HSCT survivors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer survivor; Social support; Stem cell transplant; Stress buffering

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31140146      PMCID: PMC6839542          DOI: 10.1007/s12529-019-09787-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Behav Med        ISSN: 1070-5503


  43 in total

1.  Stress-buffering or stress-exacerbation? Social support and social undermining as moderators of the relationship between perceived stress and depressive symptoms among married people.

Authors:  James A Cranford
Journal:  Pers Relatsh       Date:  2004-03

2.  The Life Engagement Test: assessing purpose in life.

Authors:  Michael F Scheier; Carsten Wrosch; Andrew Baum; Sheldon Cohen; Lynn M Martire; Karen A Matthews; Richard Schulz; Bozena Zdaniuk
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2006-03-24

3.  Effects of social support visibility on adjustment to stress: experimental evidence.

Authors:  Niall Bolger; David Amarel
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2007-03

4.  The buffering effect of social support on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function during pregnancy.

Authors:  Gerald F Giesbrecht; Julia C Poole; Nicole Letourneau; Tavis Campbell; Bonnie J Kaplan
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 4.312

5.  Understanding the Links Between Social Support and Physical Health: A Life-Span Perspective With Emphasis on the Separability of Perceived and Received Support.

Authors:  Bert N Uchino
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-05

6.  Occupational stress, social support, and burnout among correctional officers.

Authors:  J T Dignam; M Barrera; S G West
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  1986-04

7.  Effectiveness of partner social support predicts enduring psychological distress after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Christine Rini; William H Redd; Jane Austin; Catherine E Mosher; Yeraz Markarian Meschian; Luis Isola; Eileen Scigliano; Craig H Moskowitz; Esperanza Papadopoulos; Larissa E Labay; Scott Rowley; Jack E Burkhalter; Christine Dunkel Schetter; Katherine N Duhamel
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2011-02

8.  Does hugging provide stress-buffering social support? A study of susceptibility to upper respiratory infection and illness.

Authors:  Sheldon Cohen; Denise Janicki-Deverts; Ronald B Turner; William J Doyle
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-12-19

9.  Quality of life concerns and depression among hematopoietic stem cell transplant survivors.

Authors:  Catherine E Mosher; Katherine N DuHamel; Christine Rini; Geoffrey Corner; Joanne Lam; William H Redd
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Partner support and maternal depression in the context of the Iowa floods.

Authors:  Rebecca L Brock; Michael W O'Hara; Kimberly J Hart; Jennifer E McCabe; J Austin Williamson; David P Laplante; Chunbo Yu; Suzanne King
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2014-09-22
View more
  4 in total

1.  Caregiver Quality of Life Before and After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Katharine E Duckworth; Richard P McQuellon; Gregory B Russell; Kathleen C Perry; Chandylen Nightingale; Perry Shen; Konstantinos I Votanopoulos; Bonny Morris; Edward A Levine
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Peer support in patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT): a qualitative study.

Authors:  Hermioni L Amonoo; Lauren E Harnedy; Emma C Deary; Lara Traeger; Lydia A Brown; Elizabeth P Daskalakis; Corey Cutler; Amar H Kelkar; Rachael Rosales; Lauren Goldschen; William F Pirl; Emily H Feig; Anna Revette; Stephanie J Lee; Jeff C Huffman; Areej El-Jawahri
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 5.174

3.  Social support as a moderator of healthcare adherence and distress in long-term hematopoietic cell transplantation survivors.

Authors:  Kristina Holmegaard Nørskov; Jean C Yi; Marie-Laure Crouch; Allison Stover Fiscalini; Mary E D Flowers; Karen L Syrjala
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 4.442

4.  Interaction effect of coping self-efficacy and received support in daily life of hematopoietic cell transplant patient-caregiver dyads.

Authors:  Aleksandra Kroemeke; Małgorzata Sobczyk-Kruszelnicka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.