| Literature DB >> 31140002 |
Pramod Kumar Garg1, Danishwar Meena2, Divya Babu2, Rajesh Kumar Padhan3, Rajan Dhingra3, Asuri Krishna2, Subodh Kumar2, Mahesh Chandra Misra2, Virinder Kumar Bansal4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic fluid collections (PFC) may develop following acute pancreatitis (AP). Endoscopic and laparoscopic internal drainage are accepted modalities for drainage of PFCs but have not been compared in a randomized trial. Our objective was to compare endoscopic and laparoscopic internal drainage of pseudocyst/walled-off necrosis following AP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with symptomatic pseudocysts or walled-off necrosis suitable for laparoscopic and endoscopic transmural internal drainage were randomized to either modality in a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopic drainage comprised of per-oral transluminal cystogastrostomy. Additionally, endoscopic lavage and necrosectomy were done following a step-up approach for infected collections. Surgical laparoscopic cystogastrostomy was done for drainage, lavage, and necrosectomy. Primary outcome was resolution of PFCs by the intended modality and secondary outcome was complications.Entities:
Keywords: Cystogastrostomy; Endoscopic; Laparoscopic; Pancreatic fluid collections; Pseudocyst; Walled off necrosis
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31140002 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06866-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Surg Endosc ISSN: 0930-2794 Impact factor: 4.584