Literature DB >> 27845053

Endoscopic "step-up approach" using a dedicated biflanged metal stent reduces the need for direct necrosectomy in walled-off necrosis (with videos).

Sundeep Lakhtakia1, Jahangeer Basha1, Rupjyoti Talukdar1, Rajesh Gupta1, Zaheer Nabi1, Mohan Ramchandani1, B V N Kumar1, Partha Pal1, Rakesh Kalpala1, P Manohar Reddy1, R Pradeep1, Jagadish R Singh1, G V Rao1, D Nageshwar Reddy1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: EUS-guided drainage using plastic stents may be inadequate for treatment of walled-off necrosis (WON). Recent studies report variable outcomes even when using covered metal stents. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a dedicated covered biflanged metal stent (BFMS) when adopting an endoscopic "step-up approach" for drainage of symptomatic WON.
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients with symptomatic WON who underwent EUS-guided drainage using BFMSs over a 3-year period. Reassessment was done between 48 and 72 hours for resolution. Endoscopic reinterventions were tailored in nonresponders in a stepwise manner. Step 1 encompassed declogging the blocked lumen of the BFMS. In step 2, a nasocystic tube was placed via BFMSs with intermittent irrigation. Step 3 involved direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN). BFMSs were removed between 4 and 8 weeks of follow-up. The main outcome measures were technical success, clinical success, adverse events, and need for DEN.
RESULTS: Two hundred five WON patients underwent EUS-guided drainage using BFMSs. Technical success was achieved in 203 patients (99%). Periprocedure adverse events occurred in 8 patients (bleeding in 6, perforation in 2). Clinical success with BFMSs alone was seen in 153 patients (74.6%). Reintervention adopting the step-up approach was required in 49 patients (23.9%). Incremental success was achieved in 10 patients with step 1, 16 patients with step 2, and 19 patients with step 3. Overall clinical success was achieved in 198 patients (96.5%), with DEN required in 9.2%. Four patients failed treatment and required surgery (2) or percutaneous drainage (2).
CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic step-up approach using BFMSs was safe, effective, and yielded successful outcomes in most patients, reducing the need for DEN.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27845053     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  29 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy and Safety of Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents in Management of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: Are They Better Than Plastic Stents? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tariq Hammad; Muhammad Ali Khan; Yaseen Alastal; Wade Lee; Ali Nawras; Mohammad Kashif Ismail; Michel Kahaleh
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Candidemia after endoscopic therapy with lumen-apposing metal stent for pancreatic walled-off necrosis.

Authors:  Tajana Pavic; Davor Hrabar; Dominik Kralj; Ivan Lerotic; Doris Ogresta
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-01-30

3.  Endoscopic versus laparoscopic drainage of pseudocyst and walled-off necrosis following acute pancreatitis: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Pramod Kumar Garg; Danishwar Meena; Divya Babu; Rajesh Kumar Padhan; Rajan Dhingra; Asuri Krishna; Subodh Kumar; Mahesh Chandra Misra; Virinder Kumar Bansal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Management of pancreatic fluid collections.

Authors:  Dimpal Bhakta; Rabia de Latour; Lauren Khanna
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-04-25

5.  International, multicenter retrospective trial comparing the efficacy and safety of bi-flanged versus lumen-apposing metal stents for endoscopic drainage of walled-off pancreatic necrosis.

Authors:  Ali Siddiqui; Mariam Naveed; Jahangeer Basha; Sundeep Lakhtakia; Jose Nieto; Janak Shah; Kenneth Binmoeller; Megan Murphy; Rupjyoti Talukdar; Mohan K Ramchandani; Zaheer Nabi; Rajesh Gupta; Thomas E Kowalski; David E Loren; Reem Z Sharaiha; Michel Kahaleh; Patrick Ten Eyck; Arish Noor; Tayebah Mumtaz; Rakesh Kalalala; Nageshwar D Reddy; Douglas G Adler
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-01-04

6.  A multi-institutional consensus on how to perform endoscopic ultrasound-guided peri-pancreatic fluid collection drainage and endoscopic necrosectomy.

Authors:  Jintao Guo; Adrian Saftoiu; Peter Vilmann; Pietro Fusaroli; Marc Giovannini; Girish Mishra; Surinder S Rana; Sammy Ho; Jan-Werner Poley; Tiing Leong Ang; Evangelos Kalaitzakis; Ali A Siddiqui; Jose G De La Mora-Levy; Sundeep Lakhtakia; Manoop S Bhutani; Malay Sharma; Shuntaro Mukai; Pramod Kumar Garg; Linda S Lee; Juan J Vila; Everson Artifon; Douglas G Adler; Siyu Sun
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.628

7.  Novel lumen-apposing metal stent for the drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: An Italian multicentre experience.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Petrone; Livia Archibugi; Edoardo Forti; Rita Conigliaro; Roberto Di Mitri; Ilaria Tarantino; Carlo Fabbri; Alberto Larghi; Sabrina Gloria Giulia Testoni; Massimiliano Mutignani; Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-06-17       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 8.  Lumen apposing metal stents for pancreatic fluid collections: Recognition and management of complications.

Authors:  Michael L DeSimone; Akwi W Asombang; Tyler M Berzin
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-09-16

9.  A comparison of outcomes between a lumen-apposing metal stent with electrocautery-enhanced delivery system and a bi-flanged metal stent for drainage of walled-off pancreatic necrosis.

Authors:  Noor L H Bekkali; Manu K Nayar; John S Leeds; Richard M Charnley; Matthew T Huggett; Kofi W Oppong
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-11-21

10.  Pancreatic fluid collections and necrosectomy with plastic stents versus lumen-apposing stents.

Authors:  Monica Saumoy; Marianna Arvanitakis; Michel Kahaleh
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.