| Literature DB >> 31138673 |
Alfonso Benítez-Páez1, Louise Kjølbæk2, Eva M Gómez Del Pulgar3, Lena K Brahe2, Arne Astrup2, Silke Matysik4, Hans-Frieder Schött4,5, Sabrina Krautbauer4, Gerhard Liebisch4, Joanna Boberska6, Sandrine Claus6, Simone Rampelli7, Patrizia Brigidi7, Lesli H Larsen2, Yolanda Sanz3.
Abstract
Long-term consumption of dietary fiber is generally considered beneficial for weight management and metabolic health, but the results of interventions vary greatly depending on the type of dietary fibers involved. This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of the effects of a specific dietary fiber consisting of a wheat-bran extract enriched in arabinoxylan-oligosaccharides (AXOS) in a human intervention trial. An integrated multi-omics analysis has been carried out to evaluate the effects of an intervention trial with an AXOS-enriched diet in overweight individuals with indices of metabolic syndrome. Microbiome analyses were performed by shotgun DNA sequencing in feces; in-depth metabolomics using nuclear magnetic resonance in fecal, urine, and plasma samples; and massive lipid profiling using mass spectrometry in fecal and serum/plasma samples. In addition to their bifidogenic effect, we observed that AXOS boost the proportion of Prevotella species. Metagenome analysis showed increases in the presence of bacterial genes involved in vitamin/cofactor production, glycan metabolism, and neurotransmitter biosynthesis as a result of AXOS intake. Furthermore, lipidomics analysis revealed reductions in plasma ceramide levels. Finally, we observed associations between Prevotella abundance and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and succinate concentration in feces and identified a potential protective role of Eubacterium rectale against metabolic disease given that its abundance was positively associated with plasma phosphatidylcholine levels, thus hypothetically reducing bioavailability of choline for methylamine biosynthesis. The metagenomics, lipidomics, and metabolomics data integration indicates that sustained consumption of AXOS orchestrates a wide variety of changes in the gut microbiome and the host metabolism that collectively would impact on glucose homeostasis. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02215343)IMPORTANCE The use of dietary fiber food supplementation as a strategy to reduce the burden of diet-related diseases is a matter of study given its cost-effectiveness and the positive results demonstrated in clinical trials. This multi-omics assessment, on different biological samples of overweight subjects with signs of metabolic syndrome, sheds light on the early and less evident effects of short-term AXOS intake on intestinal microbiota and host metabolism. We observed a deep influence of AXOS on gut microbiota beyond their recognized bifidogenic effect by boosting concomitantly a wide diversity of butyrate producers and Prevotella copri, a microbial species abundant in non-Westernized populations with traditional lifestyle and diets enriched in fresh unprocessed foods. A comprehensive evaluation of hundreds of metabolites unveiled new benefits of the AXOS intake, such as reducing the plasma ceramide levels. Globally, we observed that multiple effects of AXOS consumption seem to converge in reversing the glucose homeostasis impairment.Entities:
Keywords: AXOS; dietary fiber; glucose homeostasis; lipidomics; metabolic syndrome; metabolomics; microbiome; overweight
Year: 2019 PMID: 31138673 PMCID: PMC6538848 DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00209-19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mSystems ISSN: 2379-5077 Impact factor: 6.496
FIG 1Graphical description of the study and the main outcomes assessed.
FIG 2Gut microbiota components influenced by AXOS intake. The distribution of normalized reads belonging to the taxonomy categories with differential abundance after AXOS consumption is depicted in box plots. Red boxes represent start point samples (baseline before the intervention), whereas turquoise boxes represent the endpoint samples (at the end of the intervention). Blue data points indicate outliers. The linear mixed model (LMM) estimate (baseline as reference group) and P values are shown. LMM indicates the variance obtained using log-transformed data.
FIG 3Taxonomy assessment of metagenes with differential abundance as a result of the AXOS intervention. (A) Genus and species distribution of the underrepresented metagenes in the metagenome of samples after AXOS intervention. (B) Similar analysis as in panel A for the overrepresented metagenes. Pie charts indicate the distribution at genus level, whereas bar plots indicate the distribution of the main species; the color coding is maintained accordingly. “Unknown” is used for taxonomic categories showing an identity score lower than 70% and no taxonomy defined at genus level. Those with a score identity higher than 70% and equal matching with several species from the different genera are shown as “Uncertain.” Numbers inside parentheses show the number of genera or species in addition to those shown in the graph.
FIG 4Gain of function in the gut microbiome as a consequence of AXOS ingestion. Overrepresented metagenes from Bifidobacterium spp. (n = 315), Prevotella copri (n = 782), non-copri Prevotella spp. (n = 415), and non-Bifidobacterium/non-Prevotella species (n = 866) were mapped to the KEGG database and then assigned to the respective functional modules of that repository. A Venn analysis displays the taxonomy-specific functions gained and those exacerbated by the simultaneous presence in at least 3 out of the 4 groups of bacterial species analyzed (dashed circle).
FIG 5Effects of the dietary intervention on urine metabolome. The urinary metabolome was analyzed by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance. Orthogonal projection to latent structure discriminant analysis models were used to compare the changes in the urinary metabolome at start points and endpoints. (A) For this pairwise comparison, the plot of the scores (T) compared with cross-validated scores (Tcv) is shown. (B) Loading plot is color coded according to the correlation coefficient (R2) with Y (predictor vector coding time of the intervention). Q2, goodness of prediction; R2, goodness of fit.