Literature DB >> 31138075

Bee pathogen transmission dynamics: deposition, persistence and acquisition on flowers.

Laura L Figueroa1, Malcolm Blinder2, Cali Grincavitch2, Angus Jelinek2, Emilia K Mann2, Liam A Merva2, Lucy E Metz2, Amy Y Zhao2, Rebecca E Irwin3, Scott H McArt1, Lynn S Adler2.   

Abstract

Infectious diseases are a primary driver of bee decline worldwide, but limited understanding of how pathogens are transmitted hampers effective management. Flowers have been implicated as hubs of bee disease transmission, but we know little about how interspecific floral variation affects transmission dynamics. Using bumblebees ( Bombus impatiens), a trypanosomatid pathogen ( Crithidia bombi) and three plant species varying in floral morphology, we assessed how host infection and plant species affect pathogen deposition on flowers, and plant species and flower parts impact pathogen survival and acquisition at flowers. We found that host infection with Crithidia increased defaecation rates on flowers, and that bees deposited faeces onto bracts of Lobelia siphilitica and Lythrum salicaria more frequently than onto Monarda didyma bracts . Among flower parts, bracts were associated with the lowest pathogen survival but highest resulting infection intensity in bee hosts. Additionally, we found that Crithidia survival across flower parts was reduced with sun exposure. These results suggest that efficiency of pathogen transmission depends on where deposition occurs and the timing and place of acquisition, which varies among plant species and environmental conditions. This information could be used for development of wildflower mixes that maximize forage while minimizing disease spread.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bombus impatiens; Crithidia bombi; disease spread; floral morphology; pollinator health

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31138075      PMCID: PMC6545085          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.0603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.530


  27 in total

Review 1.  Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers.

Authors:  Dave Goulson; Elizabeth Nicholls; Cristina Botías; Ellen L Rotheray
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Long-term global trends in crop yield and production reveal no current pollination shortage but increasing pollinator dependency.

Authors:  Marcelo A Aizen; Lucas A Garibaldi; Saul A Cunningham; Alexandra M Klein
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Native wildflower plantings support wild bee abundance and diversity in agricultural landscapes across the United States.

Authors:  Neal M Williams; Kimiora L Ward; Nathaniel Pope; Rufus Isaacs; Julianna Wilson; Emily A May; Jamie Ellis; Jaret Daniels; Akers Pence; Katharina Ullmann; Jeff Peters
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.657

4.  Interspecific geographic distribution and variation of the pathogens Nosema bombi and Crithidia species in United States bumble bee populations.

Authors:  Nils Cordes; Wei-Fone Huang; James P Strange; Sydney A Cameron; Terry L Griswold; Jeffrey D Lozier; Leellen F Solter
Journal:  J Invertebr Pathol       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Increased relative abundance of an invasive competitor for pollination, Lythrum salicaria, reduces seed number in Mimulus ringens.

Authors:  Rebecca J Flanagan; Randall J Mitchell; Jeffrey D Karron
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Disease where you dine: plant species and floral traits associated with pathogen transmission in bumble bees.

Authors:  Lynn S Adler; Kristen M Michaud; Stephen P Ellner; Scott H McArt; Philip C Stevenson; Rebecca E Irwin
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 5.499

7.  Secondary metabolites in floral nectar reduce parasite infections in bumblebees.

Authors:  Leif L Richardson; Lynn S Adler; Anne S Leonard; Jonathan Andicoechea; Karly H Regan; Winston E Anthony; Jessamyn S Manson; Rebecca E Irwin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  DYNAMIC AND GENETIC CONSEQUENCES OF VARIATION IN HORIZONTAL TRANSMISSION FOR A MICROPARASITIC INFECTION.

Authors:  Paul Schmid-Hempel; Katina Puhr; Nadja Krüger; Christine Reber; Regula Schmid-Hempel
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Bumble bee parasite strains vary in resistance to phytochemicals.

Authors:  Evan C Palmer-Young; Ben M Sadd; Philip C Stevenson; Rebecca E Irwin; Lynn S Adler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Does pathogen spillover from commercially reared bumble bees threaten wild pollinators?

Authors:  Michael C Otterstatter; James D Thomson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  25 in total

1.  Landscape simplification shapes pathogen prevalence in plant-pollinator networks.

Authors:  Laura L Figueroa; Heather Grab; Wee Hao Ng; Christopher R Myers; Peter Graystock; Quinn S McFrederick; Scott H McArt
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 9.492

2.  Crithidia bombi can infect two solitary bee species while host survivorship depends on diet.

Authors:  Laura L Figueroa; Cali Grincavitch; Scott H McArt
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.234

3.  The gut microbiota of bumblebees.

Authors:  Tobin J Hammer; Eli Le; Alexia N Martin; Nancy A Moran
Journal:  Insectes Soc       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 1.643

4.  Mutualism has its limits: consequences of asymmetric interactions between a well-defended plant and its herbivorous pollinator.

Authors:  Maria Sol Balbuena; Geoffrey T Broadhead; Ajinkya Dahake; Emily Barnett; Melissa Vergara; Krissa A Skogen; Tania Jogesh; Robert A Raguso
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 6.671

Review 5.  Flower sharing and pollinator health: a behavioural perspective.

Authors:  E Nicholls; S A Rands; C Botías; N Hempel de Ibarra
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 6.671

6.  Flowering plant composition shapes pathogen infection intensity and reproduction in bumble bee colonies.

Authors:  Lynn S Adler; Nicholas A Barber; Olivia M Biller; Rebecca E Irwin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Pathogen spillover from Apis mellifera to a stingless bee.

Authors:  Terence Purkiss; Lori Lach
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Floral traits affecting the transmission of beneficial and pathogenic pollinator-associated microbes.

Authors:  Lynn S Adler; Rebecca E Irwin; Scott H McArt; Rachel L Vannette
Journal:  Curr Opin Insect Sci       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 5.186

9.  Bee pathogen transmission dynamics: deposition, persistence and acquisition on flowers.

Authors:  Laura L Figueroa; Malcolm Blinder; Cali Grincavitch; Angus Jelinek; Emilia K Mann; Liam A Merva; Lucy E Metz; Amy Y Zhao; Rebecca E Irwin; Scott H McArt; Lynn S Adler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.530

10.  Floral shape predicts bee-parasite transmission potential.

Authors:  Mario S Pinilla-Gallego; Wee Hao Ng; Victoria E Amaral; Rebecca E Irwin
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2022-06-12       Impact factor: 6.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.