| Literature DB >> 31137530 |
Hillary Righini1, Elena Baraldi2, Yolanda García Fernández3, Antera Martel Quintana4, Roberta Roberti5.
Abstract
Water extracts and polysaccharides from Anabaena sp., Ecklonia sp., and Jania sp. were tested for their activity against the fungal plant pathogen Botrytis cinerea. Water extracts at 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mg/mL inhibited B. cinerea growth in vitro. Antifungal activity of polysaccharides obtained by N-cetylpyridinium bromide precipitation in water extracts was evaluated in vitro and in vitro at 0.5, 2.0, and 3.5 mg/mL. These concentrations were tested against fungal colony growth, spore germination, colony forming units (CFUs), CFU growth, and on strawberry fruits against B. cinerea infection with pre- and post-harvest application. In in vitro experiments, polysaccharides from Anabaena sp. and from Ecklonia sp. inhibited B. cinerea colony growth, CFUs, and CFU growth, while those extracted from Jania sp. reduced only the pathogen spore germination. In in vitro experiments, all concentrations of polysaccharides from Anabaena sp., Ecklonia sp., and Jania sp. reduced both the strawberry fruits infected area and the pathogen sporulation in the pre-harvest treatment, suggesting that they might be good candidates as preventive products in crop protection.Entities:
Keywords: Botrytis cinerea; algae; antifungal activity; cyanobacteria; polysaccharides; strawberry
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31137530 PMCID: PMC6562623 DOI: 10.3390/md17050299
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Effect of different water extract (WE) concentrations of Anabaena sp. (AN), Ecklonia (ECK), and Jania (JAN) on Botrytis cinerea colony growth rate.
| Concentration (mg/mL) WE Treatment | 0.0 | 2.5 | 5.0 | 10.0 | Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colony Growth Rate (mm/day) | |||||
| AN | 18.3 ± 0.6 | 16.3 ± 0.3 | 16.0 ± 1.3 | 16.2 ± 0.3 | 16.7 ± 1.2 A |
| ECK | 18.2 ± 0.8 | 18.2 ± 0.3 | 16.8 ± 0.8 | 16.5 ± 0.5 | 17.4 ± 0.9 A |
| JAN | 18.7 ± 0.6 | 17.5 ± 0.5 | 16.8 ± 0.3 | 16.8 ± 0.8 | 17.5 ± 0.9 A |
| Mean | 18.4 ± 0.6 c | 17.3 ± 0.9 b | 16.6 ± 0.9 a | 16.5 ± 0.6 a | |
Treatment and dose factors are significant, whereas their interaction is not significant according to factorial ANOVA. F(2,36) = 5.1, p < 0.0001 (for treatment factor), F(3,36) = 16.8, p < 0.0001 (for dose factor). Mean values ± SD followed by the same uppercase letter in a row and by the same lowercase letter in a column are not significantly different according to Student–Newman–Keuls test (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Effect of different POL concentrations on Botrytis cinerea colony growth rate. Treatment and dose factors and their interaction are significant, according to factorial ANOVA. F(2,36) = 18.2, p < 0.0001 (for treatment factor), F(3,36) = 27.8, p < 0.0001 (for dose factor), F(6,36) = 2.7, p < 0.05 (for interaction). Columns are mean values ± SD. The same uppercase letter within each POL treatment and the same lowercase letter among concentrations indicates no significant differences according to Student–Newman–Keuls test (p < 0.05).
Effective concentrations (EC50) and 95% confidence limits of polysaccharides (POL) from Anabaena sp. (AN), Ecklonia sp. (ECK), and Jania sp. (JAN) required to reduce by 50% spore germination, colony forming units (CFUs), and CFU colony growth of Botrytis cinerea.
| Treatment | EC50 POL (mg/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Spore Germination | CFUs | CFU Colony Growth | |
| AN POL | 0.058 (0.027–0.127) | 0.553 (0.255–1.202) | 1.064 (0.665–1.703) |
| ECK POL | 0.096 (0.048–0.195) | 1.201 (0.584–5.392) | 2.087 (1.627–2.676) |
| JAN POL | 0.202 (0.118–0.346) | nd a | nd a |
a not detectable, not different from the untreated control.
Figure 2Infected area of strawberry fruit caused by Botrytis cinerea (a) and its sporulation (b) after pre-harvest treatment with different concentrations of polysaccharides from Anabaena sp. (AN), Ecklonia sp. (ECK), and Jania sp. (JAN). Polysaccharides and concentration factors and their interaction are significant, according to factorial ANOVA. (a) F(2,240) = 270.0, p < 0.0001 (for treatment factor), F(3,240) = 266.3, p < 0.0001 (for dose factor), F(6,240) = 45.0, p < 0.05 (for interaction). (b) F(2,96) = 23.0, p < 0.0001 (for treatment factor), F(3,96) = 370.0, p < 0.0001 (for dose factor), F(6,96) = 18.5, p < 0.05 (for interaction). Columns are mean values ± SD. The same uppercase letter within each POL treatment and the same lowercase letter within each concentration indicates no significant differences according to Student–Newman–Keuls test (p < 0.05).