OBJECTIVE: To compare typical findings of diabetic retinopathy in optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and fluorescein angiography (FA). SUBJECTS/ METHODS: 42 patients were enrolled in this study. We performed FA and obtained en face 3 × 3 mm OCTA images of the macular region. The count of microaneurysms (MAs) and the size of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) were compared. The assessability of the imaging modalities was graded in each eye. RESULTS: 53 eyes of 42 patients with a mean age of 61 years were included. 36/53 eyes revealed nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy, 17/53 eyes had proliferative diabetic retinopathy. The mean size of the FAZ was 0.39 mm2 in FA and 0.42 mm2 in OCTA. The mean MA count was 14 in FA and 13 in OCTA. The assessability was favorable to OCTA in 38-41/53 eyes regarding the FAZ and favorable to FA in 45-49/53 eyes regarding MAs. CONCLUSION: We found a good agreement for the size of the FAZ and a weak agreement regarding the count of MAs in both imaging modalities. The readers favored OCTA for the assessment of the FAZ and FA for the assessment of MAs. Complementary use of FA and OCTA ensures the best diagnostic approach in patients with diabetic retinopathy.
OBJECTIVE: To compare typical findings of diabetic retinopathy in optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and fluorescein angiography (FA). SUBJECTS/ METHODS: 42 patients were enrolled in this study. We performed FA and obtained en face 3 × 3 mm OCTA images of the macular region. The count of microaneurysms (MAs) and the size of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) were compared. The assessability of the imaging modalities was graded in each eye. RESULTS: 53 eyes of 42 patients with a mean age of 61 years were included. 36/53 eyes revealed nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy, 17/53 eyes had proliferative diabetic retinopathy. The mean size of the FAZ was 0.39 mm2 in FA and 0.42 mm2 in OCTA. The mean MA count was 14 in FA and 13 in OCTA. The assessability was favorable to OCTA in 38-41/53 eyes regarding the FAZ and favorable to FA in 45-49/53 eyes regarding MAs. CONCLUSION: We found a good agreement for the size of the FAZ and a weak agreement regarding the count of MAs in both imaging modalities. The readers favored OCTA for the assessment of the FAZ and FA for the assessment of MAs. Complementary use of FA and OCTA ensures the best diagnostic approach in patients with diabetic retinopathy.
Authors: Supriya Dabir; Mohan Rajan; Liji Parasseril; Vaidehi Bhatt; Preetam Samant; C A B Webers; T T J M Berendschot Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2021-01-28