Roberto Bellucci1, Miriam Cargnoni2, Carlo Bellucci3. 1. University Hospital of Verona, Italy. Electronic address: robbell@tin.it. 2. University Hospital of Verona, Italy. 3. University Hospital of Parma, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the refractive, visual, and aberrometric results with a new extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens (EDOF IOL) based on alternating positive and negative spherical aberration in the central 3.0 mm optical zone and an aspheric monofocal IOL of the same platform. SETTING: Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Verona, Italy. DESIGN: Prospective case series. METHODS: Cataract patients free from other ocular disease had bilateral implantation of the EDOF Mini Well IOL or the monofocal Mini IOL. Four to 6 weeks after second-eye surgery, the refraction, visual acuity, defocus curve, contrast sensitivity, and photic symptoms were assessed. Wavefront analysis was performed. The primary endpoint of was the amplitude of the dioptric interval for 0.1 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity. The secondary endpoint was an aberration comparison between the two IOLs. RESULTS: The study comprised two groups of 25 patients each. The corrected distance visual acuity was better with the monofocal IOL by 0.02 logMAR (P = .03). The 0.1 logMAR dioptric interval was 2.0 diopters (D) for the EDOF IOL and 1.0 D for the monofocal IOL (P < .001). The mean CDVA at -2.0 defocus was 0.15 logMAR ± 0.08 (SD) and 0.52 ± 0.14 logMAR, respectively (P < .001). There was no difference in contrast sensitivity or photic symptoms. The optical aberrations at 4.0 mm and 6.0 mm aperture diameters were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The EDOF IOL based on spherical aberration provided greater depth of focus than the aspheric monofocal IOL without increasing optical aberrations and with few photic symptoms.
PURPOSE: To compare the refractive, visual, and aberrometric results with a new extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens (EDOF IOL) based on alternating positive and negative spherical aberration in the central 3.0 mm optical zone and an aspheric monofocal IOL of the same platform. SETTING: Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Verona, Italy. DESIGN: Prospective case series. METHODS:Cataractpatients free from other ocular disease had bilateral implantation of the EDOF Mini Well IOL or the monofocal Mini IOL. Four to 6 weeks after second-eye surgery, the refraction, visual acuity, defocus curve, contrast sensitivity, and photic symptoms were assessed. Wavefront analysis was performed. The primary endpoint of was the amplitude of the dioptric interval for 0.1 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity. The secondary endpoint was an aberration comparison between the two IOLs. RESULTS: The study comprised two groups of 25 patients each. The corrected distance visual acuity was better with the monofocal IOL by 0.02 logMAR (P = .03). The 0.1 logMAR dioptric interval was 2.0 diopters (D) for the EDOF IOL and 1.0 D for the monofocal IOL (P < .001). The mean CDVA at -2.0 defocus was 0.15 logMAR ± 0.08 (SD) and 0.52 ± 0.14 logMAR, respectively (P < .001). There was no difference in contrast sensitivity or photic symptoms. The optical aberrations at 4.0 mm and 6.0 mm aperture diameters were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The EDOF IOL based on spherical aberration provided greater depth of focus than the aspheric monofocal IOL without increasing optical aberrations and with few photic symptoms.