BACKGROUND: Candida auris, an emerging nosocomial pathogen, exhibits phenotypic variation. Non-aggregating C. auris isolates display greater biofilm-forming capacity and virulence than aggregate-forming isolates. Most of the studies till date have focused on clinical isolates. The biofilm-forming capacity of colonising isolates remains uninvestigated. OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to elucidate the biofilm-forming capacity of the colonising isolates of C. auris, correlate it with their aggregation behaviour and antifungal susceptibility, and compare it with that of the isolates from blood-stream infection. METHODS: Colonising and clinical (candidemia) isolates of C. auris were screened for aggregation behaviour, biofilm-forming capacity and antifungal susceptibility testing. Aggregation behaviour was assessed microscopically. Biofilm-forming capacity was determined on 96-well flat-bottomed microtitre plates. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution assay. RESULTS: Aggregative and non-aggregative phenotypes were found to be predominantly associated with colonising and clinical isolates, respectively, with the former ones being stronger biofilm producers in the colonising group. Non-aggregative isolates in the colonising group showed lower susceptibility to amphotericin B and fluconazole than aggregative isolates. In contrast, no association was noted between biofilm formation, aggregation behaviour and antifungal susceptibility amongst the clinical isolates. CONCLUSION: Biofilm formation is a strain-dependent trait in C. auris, strongly associated with the type and phenotypic behaviour of the isolates. Colonising isolates of this fungus were found to be predominantly aggregative in nature, with a higher biofilm-forming capacity than non-aggregative ones.
BACKGROUND:Candida auris, an emerging nosocomial pathogen, exhibits phenotypic variation. Non-aggregating C. auris isolates display greater biofilm-forming capacity and virulence than aggregate-forming isolates. Most of the studies till date have focused on clinical isolates. The biofilm-forming capacity of colonising isolates remains uninvestigated. OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to elucidate the biofilm-forming capacity of the colonising isolates of C. auris, correlate it with their aggregation behaviour and antifungal susceptibility, and compare it with that of the isolates from blood-stream infection. METHODS: Colonising and clinical (candidemia) isolates of C. auris were screened for aggregation behaviour, biofilm-forming capacity and antifungal susceptibility testing. Aggregation behaviour was assessed microscopically. Biofilm-forming capacity was determined on 96-well flat-bottomed microtitre plates. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution assay. RESULTS: Aggregative and non-aggregative phenotypes were found to be predominantly associated with colonising and clinical isolates, respectively, with the former ones being stronger biofilm producers in the colonising group. Non-aggregative isolates in the colonising group showed lower susceptibility to amphotericin B and fluconazole than aggregative isolates. In contrast, no association was noted between biofilm formation, aggregation behaviour and antifungal susceptibility amongst the clinical isolates. CONCLUSION: Biofilm formation is a strain-dependent trait in C. auris, strongly associated with the type and phenotypic behaviour of the isolates. Colonising isolates of this fungus were found to be predominantly aggregative in nature, with a higher biofilm-forming capacity than non-aggregative ones.
Authors: Fruzsina Nagy; Zoltán Tóth; Fanni Nyikos; Lajos Forgács; Ágnes Jakab; Andrew M Borman; László Majoros; Renátó Kovács Journal: Med Mycol Date: 2021-10-04 Impact factor: 4.076
Authors: Mariagrazia Di Luca; Anna Koliszak; Svetlana Karbysheva; Anuradha Chowdhary; Jacques F Meis; Andrej Trampuz Journal: J Fungi (Basel) Date: 2019-11-06
Authors: Jason L Brown; Chris Delaney; Bryn Short; Mark C Butcher; Emily McKloud; Craig Williams; Ryan Kean; Gordon Ramage Journal: mSphere Date: 2020-06-24 Impact factor: 4.389
Authors: Mark V Horton; Chad J Johnson; John F Kernien; Tarika D Patel; Brandon C Lam; J Z Alex Cheong; Jennifer J Meudt; Dhanansayan Shanmuganayagam; Lindsay R Kalan; Jeniel E Nett Journal: mSphere Date: 2020-01-22 Impact factor: 4.389
Authors: Amal Al Maani; Hema Paul; Azza Al-Rashdi; Adil Al Wahaibi; Amina Al-Jardani; Asma M Ali Al Abri; Mariam A H AlBalushi; Seif Al-Abri; Mohammed Al Reesi; Ali Al Maqbali; Nashwa M Al Kasaby; Theun de Groot; Jacques F Meis; Abdullah M S Al-Hatmi Journal: J Fungi (Basel) Date: 2019-10-23