Literature DB >> 31131217

Management of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Analysis of a Questionnaire Study, Correlation With a National Sample, and Perioperative Outcomes of Treatment Options.

Patawut Bovonratwet1, Matthew L Webb2, Nathaniel T Ondeck1, Jonathan J Cui1, Ryan P McLynn1, Praveen Kadimcherla3, David H Kim4, Jonathan N Grauer1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis has been shown to provide better long-term outcomes than conservative treatment. However, there is variation in surgical approaches employed by surgeons. This study investigates current surgical practice patterns and compares perioperative outcomes of 3 common surgical treatments for this pathology.
METHODS: A survey was administered to surgeons who attended the Lumbar Spine Research Society (LSRS) meeting in 2014. Data were extracted from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) from 2005 to 2014 to characterize the same responses. The 2 data sets were compared. Perioperative outcomes of those in the ACS-NSQIP posterior fusion subcohorts were characterized and compared.
RESULTS: Posterior surgical approaches utilized by surgeons who responded to the LSRS survey were similar to those captured by ACS-NSQIP where 72% of those with degenerative spondylolisthesis were fused. Of those that were fused, 8% had an uninstrumented posterior fusion, 33% had an instrumented posterior fusion, and 59% had an instrumented posterior fusion with interbody. On multivariate analysis, there was no difference in risk of postoperative adverse events, readmission, or length of stay between these 3 common types of fusion.
CONCLUSIONS: Practice patterns for the posterior management of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis were similar between LSRS survey responses and ACS-NSQIP data. The ACS-NSQIP perioperative outcome measures assessed were similar regardless of surgical technique. These findings highlight that cost-benefit considerations and longer-term outcomes have to be the measures by which surgical technique is chosen for degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lumbar Spine Research Society; complications; lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis; perioperative outcomes; posterior fusion; survey

Year:  2019        PMID: 31131217      PMCID: PMC6510177          DOI: 10.14444/6023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  33 in total

1.  Reported response rates to mailed physician questionnaires.

Authors:  S M Cummings; L A Savitz; T R Konrad
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Radiologic evaluation of adjacent superior segment facet joint violation following transpedicular instrumentation of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Rajesh R Shah; Saeed Mohammed; Asif Saifuddin; Benjamin A Taylor
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data.

Authors:  Guangyong Zou
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortality.

Authors:  Vijaya Sundararajan; Toni Henderson; Catherine Perry; Amanda Muggivan; Hude Quan; William A Ghali
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 5.  Degenerative spondylolisthesis: review of current trends and controversies.

Authors:  Dilip K Sengupta; Harry N Herkowitz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  The NSQIP: a new frontier in surgery.

Authors:  Shukri F Khuri
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  James N Weinstein; Jon D Lurie; Tor D Tosteson; Brett Hanscom; Anna N A Tosteson; Emily A Blood; Nancy J O Birkmeyer; Alan S Hilibrand; Harry Herkowitz; Frank P Cammisa; Todd J Albert; Sanford E Emery; Lawrence G Lenke; William A Abdu; Michael Longley; Thomas J Errico; Serena S Hu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Comparison of posterolateral fusion with and without additional posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Kee-Yong Ha; Ki-Ho Na; Jae-Hyuk Shin; Ki-Won Kim
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2008-06

9.  Degenerative spondylolisthesis: does fusion method influence outcome? Four-year results of the spine patient outcomes research trial.

Authors:  William A Abdu; Jon D Lurie; Kevin F Spratt; Anna N A Tosteson; Wenyan Zhao; Tor D Tosteson; Harry Herkowitz; Michael Longely; Scott D Boden; Sanford Emery; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts.

Authors:  James N Weinstein; Jon D Lurie; Tor D Tosteson; Wenyan Zhao; Emily A Blood; Anna N A Tosteson; Nancy Birkmeyer; Harry Herkowitz; Michael Longley; Lawrence Lenke; Sanford Emery; Serena S Hu
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Ibrahim Akkawi; Hassan Zmerly
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2022-01-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.