Literature DB >> 31129476

Kinetics of biofilm formation by pathogenic and spoilage microorganisms under conditions that mimic the poultry, meat, and egg processing industries.

Maricarmen Iñiguez-Moreno1, Melesio Gutiérrez-Lomelí1, María Guadalupe Avila-Novoa2.   

Abstract

Pathogens and spoilage microorganisms can develop multispecies biofilms on food contact surfaces; however, few studies have been focused on evaluated mixed biofilms of these microorganisms. Therefore this study investigated the biofilm development by pathogenic (Bacillus cereus, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella enterica Enteritidis and Typhimurium serotypes) and spoilage (Bacillus cereus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) microorganisms onto stainless-steel (SS) and polypropylene B (PP) coupons; under conditions that mimic the dairy, meat, and egg processing industry. Biofilms were developed in TSB with 10% chicken egg yolk (TSB + EY), TSB with 10% meat extract (TSB + ME) and whole milk (WM) onto SS and PP. Each tube was inoculated with 25 μL of each bacteria and then incubated at 9 or 25 °C, with enumeration at 1, 48, 120, 180 and 240 h. Biofilms were visualized by epifluorescence and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Biofilm development occurred at different phases, depending on the incubation conditions. In the reversible adhesion, the cell density of each bacteria was between 1.43 and 6.08 Log10 CFU/cm2 (p < 0.05). Moreover, significant reductions in bacteria appeared at 9 °C between 1 and 48 h of incubation. Additionally, the constant multiplication of bacteria in the biofilm occurred at 25 °C between 48 and 180 h of incubation, with increments of 2.08 Log10 CFU/cm2 to S. Typhimurium. Population establishment was observed between 48 and 180 h and 180-240 h incubation, depending on the environmental conditions (25 and 9 °C, respectively). For example, in TSB + ME at 25 °C, S. Typhimurium, P aeruginosa, and L. monocytogenes showed no statistical differences in the amounts between 48 and 180 h incubation. The dispersion phase was identified for L. monocytogenes and B. cereus at 25 °C. Epifluorescence microscopy and SEM allowed visualizing the bacteria and extracellular polymeric substances at the different biofilm stages. In conclusion, pathogens and spoilage microorganisms developed monospecies with higher cellular densities than multiespecies biofilms. In multispecies biofilms, the time to reach each biofilm phase varied is depending on environmental factors. Cell count decrements of 1.12-2.44 Log10 CFU/cm2 occurred at 48 and 240 h and were most notable in the biofilms developed at 9 °C. Additionally, cell density reached by each microorganism was different, P. aeruginosa and Salmonella were the dominant microorganisms in the biofilms while B. cereus showed the lower densities until undetectable levels.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Food contact surfaces; Food industry; Multispecies biofilms

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31129476     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  9 in total

1.  An In Vitro Model of Nonattached Biofilm-Like Bacterial Aggregates Based on Magnetic Levitation.

Authors:  Pavel Domnin; Anastasiya Arkhipova; Stanislav Petrov; Elena Sysolyatina; Vladislav Parfenov; Pavel Karalkin; Andrey Mukhachev; Alexey Gusarov; Mikhail Moisenovich; Yusef Khesuani; Svetlana Ermolaeva
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Biofilm Formation of Listeria monocytogenes and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Simulated Chicken Processing Environment.

Authors:  Qingli Dong; Linjun Sun; Taisong Fang; Yuan Wang; Zhuosi Li; Xiang Wang; Mengjie Wu; Hongzhi Zhang
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-06-28

3.  Quantitative and Compositional Study of Monospecies Biofilms of Spoilage Microorganisms in the Meat Industry and Their Interaction in the Development of Multispecies Biofilms.

Authors:  Carolina Ripolles-Avila; Nerea García-Hernández; Brayan H Cervantes-Huamán; Tina Mazaheri; José Juan Rodríguez-Jerez
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2019-12-05

Review 4.  Microbial Biofilms in the Food Industry-A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Conrado Carrascosa; Dele Raheem; Fernando Ramos; Ariana Saraiva; António Raposo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Imaging Flow Cytometry to Study Biofilm-Associated Microbial Aggregates.

Authors:  Michał Konieczny; Peter Rhein; Katarzyna Czaczyk; Wojciech Białas; Wojciech Juzwa
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Microbial Biofilms at Meat-Processing Plant as Possible Places of Bacteria Survival.

Authors:  Yury Nikolaev; Yulia Yushina; Andrey Mardanov; Evgeniy Gruzdev; Ekaterina Tikhonova; Galina El-Registan; Aleksey Beletskiy; Anastasia Semenova; Elena Zaiko; Dagmara Bataeva; Ekaterina Polishchuk
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-08-06

7.  Bacterial Attachment and Biofilm Formation on Antimicrobial Sealants and Stainless Steel Surfaces.

Authors:  Luminita Ciolacu; Elena Zand; Carmen Negrau; Henry Jaeger
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-10-05

8.  Visible Light as an Antimicrobial Strategy for Inactivation of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Staphylococcus epidermidis Biofilms.

Authors:  Valeria Angarano; Cindy Smet; Simen Akkermans; Charlotte Watt; Andre Chieffi; Jan F M Van Impe
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-10

9.  Biofilm-Forming Ability of Microbacterium lacticum and Staphylococcus capitis Considering Physicochemical and Topographical Surface Properties.

Authors:  Elena Zand; Hedwig Pfanner; Konrad J Domig; Gerhard Sinn; Marija Zunabovic-Pichler; Henry Jaeger
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-03-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.