Literature DB >> 31128821

Barriers and facilitators impacting reliability of the electronic health record-facilitated total testing process.

Daniel R Murphy1, Tyler Satterly2, Deevakar Rogith3, Dean F Sittig4, Hardeep Singh2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite ongoing efforts to improve reliability of the total testing process (TTP), breakdowns continue to occur resulting in diagnostic delays and suboptimal patient outcomes. We performed an exploratory study to identify factors that impact TTP reliability in electronic health record (EHR)-enabled care.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We interviewed experts at three large EHR-enabled health care organizations and identified all TTP steps performed from clinician test ordering to result communication to patients. Findings from all sites were combined to develop a detailed process map of known TTP activities. We additionally asked experts about factors that positively or negatively impacted TTP reliability at each step. We describe the specific TTP steps identified and associated barriers and facilitators to TTP reliability.
RESULTS: We interviewed 39 experts involved in or overseeing the TTP. Most TTP activities identified were similar across sites, but we found significant differences with test order transmission to diagnostic services and relay of results back to clinicians and patients. Twenty-five unique barriers were identified related to technology and EHR usability issues, time and resource constraints, suboptimal clinic workflows, patient-related factors, information access limitations, and insufficient clinician training. Twenty-four unique facilitators were identified related to personnel training, workflow optimization and standardization, helpful EHR features, and improved electronic communication between clinics and diagnostic services. DISCUSSION: Barriers related to EHR usability and with communication between clinicians and diagnostic services increase TTP vulnerability and should be targeted by future efforts to improve process reliability. Several facilitators identified in the study could inform future strategies and solutions to improve TTP reliability. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic health records; Health information technology; Laboratory; Medical informatics; Radiology; Test results; Total testing process

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31128821     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  4 in total

1.  Molecular pathology testing for non-small cell lung cancer: an observational study of elements currently present in request forms and result reports and the opinion of different stakeholders.

Authors:  Kelly Dufraing; Kaat Van Casteren; Joke Breyne; Nicky D'Haene; Claude Van Campenhout; Sara Vander Borght; Karen Zwaenepoel; Etienne Rouleau; Ed Schuuring; Jan von der Thüsen; Elisabeth Dequeker
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Why Test Results Are Still Getting "Lost" to Follow-up: a Qualitative Study of Implementation Gaps.

Authors:  Andrew J Zimolzak; Umber Shahid; Traber D Giardina; Sahar A Memon; Umair Mushtaq; Lisa Zubkoff; Daniel R Murphy; Andrea Bradford; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Development an extended-information success system model (ISSM) based on nurses' point of view for hospital EHRs: a combined framework and questionnaire.

Authors:  Zahra Ebnehoseini; Hamed Tabesh; Amir Deghatipour; Mahmood Tara
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  Blockchain-Based Architecture Design for Personal Health Record: Development and Usability Study.

Authors:  Thiago Bulhões da Silva Costa; Lucas Shinoda; Ramon Alfredo Moreno; Jose E Krieger; Marco Gutierrez
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 7.076

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.