Literature DB >> 31127830

Barriers and facilitators to clinical information seeking: a systematic review.

Christopher A Aakre1, Lauren A Maggio2, Guilherme Del Fiol3, David A Cook1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study sought to identify barriers to and facilitators of point-of-care information seeking and use of knowledge resources.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library from 1991 to February 2017. We included qualitative studies in any language exploring barriers to and facilitators of point-of-care information seeking or use of electronic knowledge resources. Two authors independently extracted data on users, study design, and study quality. We inductively identified specific barriers or facilitators and from these synthesized a model of key determinants of information-seeking behaviors.
RESULTS: Forty-five qualitative studies were included, reporting data derived from interviews (n = 26), focus groups (n = 21), ethnographies (n = 6), logs (n = 4), and usability studies (n = 2). Most studies were performed within the context of general medicine (n = 28) or medical specialties (n = 13). We inductively identified 58 specific barriers and facilitators and then created a model reflecting 5 key determinants of information-seeking behaviors: time includes subthemes of time availability, efficiency of information seeking, and urgency of information need; accessibility includes subthemes of hardware access, hardware speed, hardware portability, information restriction, and cost of resources; personal skills and attitudes includes subthemes of computer literacy, information-seeking skills, and contextual attitudes about information seeking; institutional attitudes, cultures, and policies includes subthemes describing external individual and institutional information-seeking influences; and knowledge resource features includes subthemes describing information-seeking efficiency, information content, information organization, resource familiarity, information credibility, information currency, workflow integration, compatibility of recommendations with local processes, and patient educational support.
CONCLUSIONS: Addressing these determinants of information-seeking behaviors may facilitate clinicians' question answering to improve patient care.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical decision support; educational technology; information storage and retrieval; information systems; medical education

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31127830      PMCID: PMC7647205          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocz065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  69 in total

Review 1.  How do primary care physicians seek answers to clinical questions? A literature review.

Authors:  Herma C H Coumou; Frans J Meijman
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2006-01

2.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Web information retrieval for health professionals.

Authors:  S L Ting; Eric W K See-To; Y K Tse
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Medical student appraisal: searching on smartphones.

Authors:  S Khalifian; T Markman; P Sampognaro; S Mitchell; S Weeks; J Dattilo
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 5.  Clinical questions raised by clinicians at the point of care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Guilherme Del Fiol; T Elizabeth Workman; Paul N Gorman
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  Information sources used by New South Wales cancer clinicians: a qualitative study.

Authors:  E L Tan; H Stark; J S Lowinger; C Ringland; R Ward; S -A Pearson
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.048

7.  The role of tablets in accessing information throughout undergraduate medical education in Botswana.

Authors:  Rachel E Witt; Masego B Kebaetse; John H Holmes; Ryan Littman-Quinn; Dineo Ketshogileng; Cynthia Antwi; Carrie Kovarik; Oathokwa Nkomazana
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 4.046

8.  Electronic information and clinical decision support for prescribing: state of play in Australian general practice.

Authors:  Jane Robertson; Annette J Moxey; David A Newby; Malcolm B Gillies; Margaret Williamson; Sallie-Anne Pearson
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 2.267

9.  Qualitative study of physicians' varied uses of biomedical research in the USA.

Authors:  Lauren A Maggio; Laura L Moorhead; John M Willinsky
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Tensions associated with the use of electronic knowledge resources within clinical decision-making processes: a multiple case study.

Authors:  N Mysore; P Pluye; R M Grad; J Johnson-Lafleur
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 4.046

View more
  7 in total

1.  A scoping review of clinical decision support tools that generate new knowledge to support decision making in real time.

Authors:  Anna Ostropolets; Linying Zhang; George Hripcsak
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Why are they not accessing it? User barriers to clinical information access.

Authors:  Elizabeth Laera; Karen Gutzman; Angela Spencer; Charlotte Beyer; Saskia Bolore; John Gallagher; Sean Pidgeon; Ryan Rodriguez
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2021-01-01

3.  Strategies to implement SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care testing into primary care settings: a qualitative secondary analysis guided by the Behaviour Change Wheel.

Authors:  Patrick Kierkegaard; Timothy Hicks; A Joy Allen; Yaling Yang; Gail Hayward; Margaret Glogowska; Brian D Nicholson; Peter Buckle
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2021-12-18

4.  Artificial intelligence behind the scenes: PubMed's Best Match algorithm.

Authors:  Lucy Kiester; Clara Turp
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2022-01-01

5.  Doctor! Did you Google my symptoms? A qualitative study of patient perceptions of doctors' point-of-care information seeking.

Authors:  Isaac Tranter; Mieke L van Driel; Ben Mitchell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 3.006

6.  Characterizing physicians' information needs related to a gap in knowledge unmet by current evidence.

Authors:  Anna Ostropolets; RuiJun Chen; Linying Zhang; George Hripcsak
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2020-05-07

7.  Use of online knowledge base in primary health care and correlation to health care quality: an observational study.

Authors:  Christian Gerdesköld; Eva Toth-Pal; Inger Wårdh; Gunnar H Nilsson; Anna Nager
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.796

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.