Literature DB >> 26878765

The role of tablets in accessing information throughout undergraduate medical education in Botswana.

Rachel E Witt1, Masego B Kebaetse2, John H Holmes1, Ryan Littman-Quinn3, Dineo Ketshogileng2, Cynthia Antwi3, Carrie Kovarik4, Oathokwa Nkomazana2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mobile learning (mLearning) uses wireless networks and mobile devices to expand physician trainees' and healthcare providers' access to and exchange of medical information. Opportunities to increase implementation and expand use of mobile devices to support health care information access and delivery in Africa are vast, but the rapid growth of mLearning has caused project implementation to outpace objective measurement of impact. This study makes a contribution to the existing body of literature regarding mLearning implementation in Africa through its focus on the use of smart devices (tablets) in undergraduate medical education and medical students' perceptions of the effects on their learning environment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The population of this prospective mixed-methods study consisted of 82 undergraduate medical students (45 third year and 37 fourth year) at the University of Botswana Faculty of Medicine. They received tablets in the earliest phase of the mLearning project implementation (between November 2012 and January 2013), when they were in the third and fourth year of their medical training. Usage of the tablets was assessed both quantitatively and qualitatively, through both application usage tracking and focus groups.
RESULTS: Based on application usage data and coding and analysis of focus group discussions, undergraduate medical students indicated that tablets were useful in their medical education, allowing them continual access to information and opportunities for communication. Participants noted that the primary barrier to use of tablets was the lack of mobile cellular Internet beyond the Wi-Fi zones at the training sites. Moreover, participants offered suggestions for improvements to the implementation process.
CONCLUSIONS: Even in resource-limited settings where Internet access can be unreliable and intermittent, the adoption of tablets can have benefits to medical education by providing consistent access to extensive and current medical information resources. This study highlights the value of clinical resources with offline functionality, with or without consistent access to the Internet. There is also the potential for optimizing the use of tablets through improved training and technical support.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medical education; Mobile learning (mLearning); Tablets

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26878765     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  10 in total

1.  Barriers and facilitators to clinical information seeking: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christopher A Aakre; Lauren A Maggio; Guilherme Del Fiol; David A Cook
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Tablet-based disclosure counselling for HIV-infected children, adolescents, and their caregivers: a pilot study.

Authors:  Megan S McHenry; Edith Apondi; Carole I McAteer; Winstone M Nyandiko; Lydia J Fischer; Ananda R Ombitsa; Josephine Aluoch; Michael L Scanlon; Rachel C Vreeman
Journal:  Afr J AIDS Res       Date:  2018-10-14       Impact factor: 1.300

3.  Building capacity for information and communication technology use in global health research and training in China: a qualitative study among Chinese health sciences faculty members.

Authors:  Jie Wang; Abu S Abdullah; Zhenyu Ma; Hua Fu; Kaiyong Huang; Hongping Yu; Jiaji Wang; Le Cai; Huimin He; Jian Xiao; Lisa Quintiliani; Robert H Friedman; Li Yang
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2017-06-28

4.  The value of mobile tablet computers (iPads) in the undergraduate medical curriculum.

Authors:  Smit Patel; Anne Burke-Gaffney
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2018-08-10

5.  Mobile learning in medicine: an evaluation of attitudes and behaviours of medical students.

Authors:  Thomas J G Chase; Adam Julius; Joht Singh Chandan; Emily Powell; Charles S Hall; Benedict Lyle Phillips; Ryan Burnett; Deborah Gill; Bimbi Fernando
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Influences on the Implementation of Mobile Learning for Medical and Nursing Education: Qualitative Systematic Review by the Digital Health Education Collaboration.

Authors:  Priya Lall; Rebecca Rees; Gloria Chun Yi Law; Gerard Dunleavy; Živa Cotič; Josip Car
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Features, barriers, and influencing factors of mobile learning in higher education: A systematic review.

Authors:  Samoekan Sophonhiranrak
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-04-08

8.  E-Learning during COVID-19 pandemic; Turning a crisis into opportunity: A cross-sectional study at The University of Jordan.

Authors:  Amjad Bani Hani; Yazan Hijazein; Hiba Hadadin; Alma K Jarkas; Zahraa Al-Tamimi; Marzouq Amarin; Amjad Shatarat; Mahmoud Abu Abeeleh; Raed Al-Taher
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-09-24

9.  The 'connectaholic' behind the curtain: medical student use of computer devices in the clinical setting and the influence of patients.

Authors:  Eric Clarke; Jane Burns; Catherine Bruen; Martina Crehan; Erica Smyth; Teresa Pawlikowska
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Mobile learning in clinical settings: unveiling the paradox.

Authors:  Shuh Shing Lee; Sook Muay Tay; Ashokka Balakrishnan; Su Ping Yeo; Dujeepa D Samarasekera
Journal:  Korean J Med Educ       Date:  2021-11-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.