Literature DB >> 31126597

Experimental High-Frequency Irreversible Electroporation Using a Single-Needle Delivery Approach for Nonthermal Pancreatic Ablation In Vivo.

Timothy J O'Brien1, Michael Passeri2, Melvin F Lorenzo1, Jesse K Sulzer2, William B Lyman2, Jacob H Swet2, Dionisios Vrochides2, Erin H Baker2, David A Iannitti2, Rafael V Davalos1, Iain H McKillop3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of single-needle high-frequency irreversible electroporation (SN-HFIRE) to create reproducible tissue ablations in an in vivo pancreatic swine model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: SN-HFIRE was performed in swine pancreas in vivo in the absence of intraoperative paralytics or cardiac synchronization using 3 different voltage waveforms (1-5-1, 2-5-2, and 5-5-5 [on-off-on times (μs)], n = 6/setting) with a total energized time of 100 μs per burst. At necropsy, ablation size/shape was determined. Immunohistochemistry was performed to quantify apoptosis using an anticleaved caspase-3 antibody. A numerical model was developed to determine lethal thresholds for each waveform in pancreas.
RESULTS: Mean tissue ablation time was 5.0 ± 0.2 minutes, and no cardiac abnormalities or muscle twitch was detected. Mean ablation area significantly increased with increasing pulse width (41.0 ± 5.1 mm2 [range 32-66 mm2] vs 44 ± 2.1 mm2 [range 38-56 mm2] vs 85.0 ± 7.0 mm2 [range 63-155 mm2]; 1-5-1, 2-5-2, 5-5-5, respectively; p < 0.0002 5-5-5 vs 1-5-1 and 2-5-2). The majority of the ablation zone did not stain positive for cleaved caspase-3 (6.1 ± 2.8% [range 1.8-9.1%], 8.8 ± 1.3% [range 5.5-14.0%], and 11.0 ± 1.4% [range 7.1-14.2%] cleaved caspase-3 positive 1-5-1, 2-5-2, 5-5-5, respectively), with significantly more positive staining at the 5-5-5 pulse setting compared with 1-5-1 (p < 0.03). Numerical modeling determined a lethal threshold of 1114 ± 123 V/cm (1-5-1 waveform), 1039 ± 103 V/cm (2-5-2 waveform), and 693 ± 81 V/cm (5-5-5 waveform).
CONCLUSIONS: SN-HFIRE induces rapid, predictable ablations in pancreatic tissue in vivo without the need for intraoperative paralytics or cardiac synchronization.
Copyright © 2019 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31126597     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.01.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  8 in total

Review 1.  The interplay of excitation and electroporation in nanosecond pulse stimulation.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Olga N Pakhomova
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 5.373

2.  Muscle contractions and pain sensation accompanying high-frequency electroporation pulses.

Authors:  Aleksandra Cvetkoska; Alenka Maček-Lebar; Peter Trdina; Damijan Miklavčič; Matej Reberšek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  High-Frequency Irreversible Electroporation for Treatment of Primary Liver Cancer: A Proof-of-Principle Study in Canine Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Brittanie R Partridge; Timothy J O'Brien; Melvin F Lorenzo; Sheryl L Coutermarsh-Ott; Sabrina L Barry; Krystina Stadler; Noelle Muro; Mitchell Meyerhoeffer; Irving C Allen; Rafael V Davalos; Nikolaos G Dervisis
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Rapid Impedance Spectroscopy for Monitoring Tissue Impedance, Temperature, and Treatment Outcome During Electroporation-Based Therapies.

Authors:  Melvin F Lorenzo; Suyashree P Bhonsle; Christopher B Arena; Rafael V Davalos
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  A Theoretical Argument for Extended Interpulse Delays in Therapeutic High-Frequency Irreversible Electroporation Treatments.

Authors:  Kenneth N Aycock; Yajun Zhao; Melvin F Lorenzo; Rafael V Davalos
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 4.756

6.  Dynamics of Cell Death After Conventional IRE and H-FIRE Treatments.

Authors:  Borja Mercadal; Natalie Beitel-White; Kenneth N Aycock; Quim Castellví; Rafael V Davalos; Antoni Ivorra
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Temporal Characterization of Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption with High-Frequency Electroporation.

Authors:  Melvin F Lorenzo; Sean C Thomas; Yukitaka Kani; Jonathan Hinckley; Matthew Lee; Joy Adler; Scott S Verbridge; Fang-Chi Hsu; John L Robertson; Rafael V Davalos; John H Rossmeisl
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Cardiac impact of high-frequency irreversible electroporation using an asymmetrical waveform on liver in vivo.

Authors:  Jing Li; Jingjing Wang; Xiaobo Zhang; Xiao Zhang; Hongmei Gao; Yueyong Xiao
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 2.298

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.