Literature DB >> 31125584

Use of connectivity mapping to support read across: A deeper dive using data from 186 chemicals, 19 cell lines and 2 case studies.

K Nadira De Abrew1, Yuqing K Shan2, Xiaohong Wang2, Jesse M Krailler2, Raghunandan M Kainkaryam2, Cathy C Lester2, Raja S Settivari3, Matthew J LeBaron3, Jorge M Naciff2, George P Daston2.   

Abstract

We previously demonstrated that the Connectivity Map (CMap) (Lamb et al., 2006) concept can be successfully applied to a predictive toxicology paradigm to generate meaningful MoA-based connections between chemicals (De Abrew et al., 2016). Here we expand both the chemical and biological (cell lines) domain for the method and demonstrate two applications, both in the area of read across. In the first application we demonstrate CMap's utility as a tool for testing biological relevance of source chemicals (analogs) during a chemistry led read across exercise. In the second application we demonstrate how CMap can be used to identify functionally relevant source chemicals (analogs) for a structure of interest (SOI)/target chemical with minimal knowledge of chemical structure. Finally, we highlight four factors: promiscuity of chemical, dose, cell line and timepoint as having significant impact on the output. We discuss the biological relevance of these four factors and incorporate them into a work flow.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  21st century tox; Connectivity mapping; New approach methodologies (NAM); Next generation risk assessment (NGRA); Read across; Toxicogenomics

Year:  2019        PMID: 31125584     DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2019.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicology        ISSN: 0300-483X            Impact factor:   4.221


  11 in total

Review 1.  In silico toxicology: From structure-activity relationships towards deep learning and adverse outcome pathways.

Authors:  Jennifer Hemmerich; Gerhard F Ecker
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci       Date:  2020-03-31

2.  Progress towards an OECD reporting framework for transcriptomics and metabolomics in regulatory toxicology.

Authors:  Joshua A Harrill; Mark R Viant; Carole L Yauk; Magdalini Sachana; Timothy W Gant; Scott S Auerbach; Richard D Beger; Mounir Bouhifd; Jason O'Brien; Lyle Burgoon; Florian Caiment; Donatella Carpi; Tao Chen; Brian N Chorley; John Colbourne; Raffaella Corvi; Laurent Debrauwer; Claire O'Donovan; Timothy M D Ebbels; Drew R Ekman; Frank Faulhammer; Laura Gribaldo; Gina M Hilton; Stephanie P Jones; Aniko Kende; Thomas N Lawson; Sofia B Leite; Pim E G Leonards; Mirjam Luijten; Alberto Martin; Laura Moussa; Serge Rudaz; Oliver Schmitz; Tomasz Sobanski; Volker Strauss; Monica Vaccari; Vikrant Vijay; Ralf J M Weber; Antony J Williams; Andrew Williams; Russell S Thomas; Maurice Whelan
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Comparison of Approaches for Determining Bioactivity Hits from High-Dimensional Profiling Data.

Authors:  Johanna Nyffeler; Derik E Haggard; Clinton Willis; R Woodrow Setzer; Richard Judson; Katie Paul-Friedman; Logan J Everett; Joshua A Harrill
Journal:  SLAS Discov       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 3.341

4.  A comparison of classical and 21st century genotoxicity tools: A proof of concept study of 18 chemicals comparing in vitro micronucleus, ToxTracker and genomics-based methods (TGx-DDI, whole genome clustering and connectivity mapping).

Authors:  Ashley Allemang; K Nadira De Abrew; Yuqing K Shan; Jesse M Krailler; Stefan Pfuhler
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.216

5.  Rapid hazard characterization of environmental chemicals using a compendium of human cell lines from different organs

Authors:  Zunwei Chen; Yizhong Liu; Fred A Wright; Weihsueh A Chiu; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 6.043

6.  Paving the way for application of next generation risk assessment to safety decision-making for cosmetic ingredients.

Authors:  M P Dent; E Vaillancourt; R S Thomas; P L Carmichael; G Ouedraogo; H Kojima; J Barroso; J Ansell; T S Barton-Maclaren; S H Bennekou; K Boekelheide; J Ezendam; J Field; S Fitzpatrick; M Hatao; R Kreiling; M Lorencini; C Mahony; B Montemayor; R Mazaro-Costa; J Oliveira; V Rogiers; D Smegal; R Taalman; Y Tokura; R Verma; C Willett; C Yang
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  Mapping Mechanistic Pathways of Acute Oral Systemic Toxicity Using Chemical Structure and Bioactivity Measurements.

Authors:  Stephen W Edwards; Mark Nelms; Virginia K Hench; Jessica Ponder; Kristie Sullivan
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-03-07

8.  Grouping of UVCB substances with dose-response transcriptomics data from human cell-based assays.

Authors:  John S House; Fabian A Grimm; William D Klaren; Abigail Dalzell; Srikeerthana Kuchi; Shu-Dong Zhang; Klaus Lenz; Peter J Boogaard; Hans B Ketelslegers; Timothy W Gant; Ivan Rusyn; Fred A Wright
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 6.250

9.  Clustering a Chemical Inventory for Safety Assessment of Fragrance Ingredients: Identifying Read-Across Analogs to Address Data Gaps.

Authors:  Mihir S Date; Devin O'Brien; Danielle J Botelho; Terry W Schultz; Daniel C Liebler; Trevor M Penning; Daniel T Salvito
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 3.739

10.  Drivers of and Obstacles to the Adoption of Toxicogenomics for Chemical Risk Assessment: Insights from Social Science Perspectives.

Authors:  Guillaume Pain; Gordon Hickey; Matthieu Mondou; Doug Crump; Markus Hecker; Niladri Basu; Steven Maguire
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.