Literature DB >> 31124033

Assessing the accuracy of ICD-10 codes for identifying acute thromboembolic events among patients receiving anticoagulation therapy.

Kevin Lawrence1, Christopher Joos1, Aubrey E Jones1, Stacy A Johnson2, Daniel M Witt3.   

Abstract

International classification of disease (ICD) codes can improve the efficiency of epidemiological research provided the codes accurately identify outcomes of interest. The purpose of this retrospective cross-sectional study is to evaluate the accuracy of ICD-10 codes for identifying thromboembolic events occurring during anticoagulation therapy. Medical charts of patients hospitalized for any reason while receiving anticoagulant therapy between September 1, 2017 and December 31, 2017 were reviewed by two reviewers blinded to ICD-10 code status. Following identification of confirmed acute thromboembolic events, ICD-10 codes were unblinded and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) along with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for coding in any diagnosis position ("principal" or "other"). There were 661 hospitalizations identified among 487 anticoagulated patients. There were 27 thromboembolic events identified during chart review. Stroke and venous thromboembolism were the most common thromboembolic event types. Overall thromboembolic ICD-10 coding sensitivity was 100.0% (95% CI 87.2-100.0); specificity was 79.3% (75.9-82.4). PPV was 17.1% (11.6-23.9%), and NPV was 100% (99.3-100.0). ICD-10 codes can reliably be used for ruling out hospitalizations for thromboembolic events in patients receiving anticoagulation therapy but should not be used for identifying thromboembolic complications without confirmatory chart review.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticoagulation; Diagnostic errors; Direct oral anticoagulants; ICD-10 codes; Thromboembolic events; Warfarin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31124033     DOI: 10.1007/s11239-019-01885-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis        ISSN: 0929-5305            Impact factor:   2.300


  13 in total

1.  Overbilling vs. downcoding--the battle between physicians and insurers.

Authors:  Aaron S Kesselheim; Troyen A Brennan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Physician manipulation of reimbursement rules for patients: between a rock and a hard place.

Authors:  M K Wynia; D S Cummins; J B VanGeest; I B Wilson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-04-12       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Evaluation of the predictive value of ICD-9-CM coded administrative data for venous thromboembolism in the United States.

Authors:  Richard H White; Martina Garcia; Banafsheh Sadeghi; Daniel J Tancredi; Patricia Zrelak; Joanne Cuny; Pradeep Sama; Harriet Gammon; Stephen Schmaltz; Patrick S Romano
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 3.944

4.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

5.  Assessment of the coding accuracy of warfarin-related bleeding events.

Authors:  Thomas Delate; Aubrey E Jones; Nathan P Clark; Daniel M Witt
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.944

6.  Major bleeding after hospitalization for deep-venous thrombosis.

Authors:  R H White; R J Beyth; H Zhou; P S Romano
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Gregory Y H Lip; Robby Nieuwlaat; Ron Pisters; Deirdre A Lane; Harry J G M Crijns
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Importance of Proper Utilization of International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision and Clinical Documentation in Modern Payment Models.

Authors:  Joseph C Nichols; Feroz A Osmani; Yousuf Sayeed
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Limitations of pulmonary embolism ICD-10 codes in emergency department administrative data: let the buyer beware.

Authors:  Kristin Burles; Grant Innes; Kevin Senior; Eddy Lang; Andrew McRae
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Billing and up coding: What's a doctor-patient to do?

Authors:  J M Grant-Kels; A Kim; J Graff
Journal:  Int J Womens Dermatol       Date:  2016-09-21
View more
  4 in total

1.  COVID-19 and venous thromboembolism risk in patients with sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Ashima Singh; Amanda M Brandow; Ted Wun; Arun S Shet
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2022-08-09

2.  Administrative codes inaccurately identify recurrent venous thromboembolism: The CVRN VTE study.

Authors:  Christine Baumgartner; Alan S Go; Dongjie Fan; Sue Hee Sung; Daniel M Witt; John R Schmelzer; Marc S Williams; Steven H Yale; Jeffrey J VanWormer; Margaret C Fang
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 3.944

3.  Psychiatric Comorbidities in Functional Movement Disorders: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Zachary A Macchi; Isaiah Kletenik; Caroline Olvera; Samantha K Holden
Journal:  Mov Disord Clin Pract       Date:  2021-04-26

4.  Age-stratified outcomes of bioprosthetic and mechanical aortic valve replacements in an Australian cohort of 13 377 patients.

Authors:  Oluwadamisola Temilade Sotade; Michael Falster; Leonard N Girardi; Sallie-Anne Pearson; Louisa R Jorm
Journal:  BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol       Date:  2020-10-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.