OBJECTIVE: To determine the positive predictive value of International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) discharge codes for acute deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 3456 cases hospitalized between 2005 and 2007 that had a discharge code for venous thromboembolism, using 3 sample populations: a single academic hospital, 33 University HealthSystem Consortium hospitals, and 35 community hospitals in a national Joint Commission study. Analysis was stratified by position of the code in the principal versus a secondary position. RESULTS: Among 1096 cases that had a thromboembolism code in the principal position the positive predictive value for any acute venous thrombosis was 95% (95%CI:93-97), whereas among 2360 cases that had a thromboembolism code in a secondary position the predictive value was lower, 75% (95%CI:71-80). The corresponding positive predictive values for lower extremity deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism were 91% (95%CI:86-95) and 50% (95%CI:41-58), respectively. More highly defined codes had higher predictive value. Among codes in a secondary position that were false positive, 22% (95%CI:16-27) had chronic/prior venous thrombosis, 15% (95%CI:10-19) had an upper extremity thrombosis, 6% (95%CI:4-8) had a superficial vein thrombosis, and 7% (95%CI:4-13) had no mention of any thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: ICD-9-CM codes for venous thromboembolism had high predictive value when present in the principal position, and lower predictive value when in a secondary position. New thromboembolism codes that were added in 2009 that specify chronic thrombosis, upper extremity thrombosis and superficial venous thrombosis should reduce the frequency of false-positive thromboembolism codes. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the positive predictive value of International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) discharge codes for acute deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 3456 cases hospitalized between 2005 and 2007 that had a discharge code for venous thromboembolism, using 3 sample populations: a single academic hospital, 33 University HealthSystem Consortium hospitals, and 35 community hospitals in a national Joint Commission study. Analysis was stratified by position of the code in the principal versus a secondary position. RESULTS: Among 1096 cases that had a thromboembolism code in the principal position the positive predictive value for any acute venous thrombosis was 95% (95%CI:93-97), whereas among 2360 cases that had a thromboembolism code in a secondary position the predictive value was lower, 75% (95%CI:71-80). The corresponding positive predictive values for lower extremity deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism were 91% (95%CI:86-95) and 50% (95%CI:41-58), respectively. More highly defined codes had higher predictive value. Among codes in a secondary position that were false positive, 22% (95%CI:16-27) had chronic/prior venous thrombosis, 15% (95%CI:10-19) had an upper extremity thrombosis, 6% (95%CI:4-8) had a superficial vein thrombosis, and 7% (95%CI:4-13) had no mention of any thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: ICD-9-CM codes for venous thromboembolism had high predictive value when present in the principal position, and lower predictive value when in a secondary position. New thromboembolism codes that were added in 2009 that specify chronic thrombosis, upper extremity thrombosis and superficial venous thrombosis should reduce the frequency of false-positive thromboembolism codes. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Richard E Nelson; Scott D Grosse; Norman J Waitzman; Junji Lin; Scott L DuVall; Olga Patterson; James Tsai; Nimia Reyes Journal: Thromb Res Date: 2015-01-26 Impact factor: 3.944
Authors: Katherine P Liao; Jiehuan Sun; Tianrun A Cai; Nicholas Link; Chuan Hong; Jie Huang; Jennifer E Huffman; Jessica Gronsbell; Yichi Zhang; Yuk-Lam Ho; Victor Castro; Vivian Gainer; Shawn N Murphy; Christopher J O'Donnell; J Michael Gaziano; Kelly Cho; Peter Szolovits; Isaac S Kohane; Sheng Yu; Tianxi Cai Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Thomas L Ortel; Katie Arnold; Michele Beckman; Audrey Brown; Nimia Reyes; Ibrahim Saber; Ryan Schulteis; Bhavana Pendurthi Singh; Andrea Sitlinger; Elizabeth H Thames Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2019-07-31 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Matthew Alcusky; Jennifer Tjia; David D McManus; Anne L Hume; Marc Fisher; Kate L Lapane Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-04-06 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Hussain R Yusuf; W Craig Hooper; Michele G Beckman; Qing C Zhang; James Tsai; Thomas L Ortel Journal: J Thromb Thrombolysis Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 2.300