Joanie Martineau1,2, Julien Goulet1,2, Andréane Richard-Denis1,2, Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong3,4. 1. Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada. 2. Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada. 3. Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada. jean-marc.mac-thiong@umontreal.ca. 4. Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada. jean-marc.mac-thiong@umontreal.ca.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of 82 patients with cervical traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI). OBJECTIVES: Determine the relevance of preoperative MRI to predict neurological recovery following cervical TSCI. SETTING: Level I trauma center specialized in TSCI. METHODS: The following three MRI parameters were assessed: presence of an intramedullary hemorrhage, intramedullary lesion length and maximal compression of the spinal cord compression (MSCC). Analyses were performed to assess the relationship between MRI parameters and three neurological outcomes: ASIA motor score (AMS), improvement by at least one ASIA impairment scale (AIS) grade (conversion of AIS grade), and reaching AIS grade D or E. RESULTS: Predicting AMS based on initial AIS grade and intramedullary hemorrhage resulted in a validation R-squared of 0.662, and of 0.636 when using only the initial AIS grade. Predicting conversion of AIS grade based on initial AIS grade, intramedullary hemorrhage and lesion length resulted in a validation c-index of 0.704, and of 0.727 when using only the initial AIS grade. Predicting the likelihood of a follow-up AIS grade D or E based on initial AIS grade and intramedullary hemorrhage in a validation c-index of 0.903, and of 0.873 when using only the initial AIS grade. CONCLUSIONS: Intramedullary hemorrhage and lesion length assessed from preoperative MRI were predictors of the neurological recovery following cervical TSCI. However, the clinical benefit of these MRI parameters to predict the neurological recovery remains limited when the initial AIS grade is available, confirming that the initial neurological status remains the most important predictor of the neurological outcome.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of 82 patients with cervical traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI). OBJECTIVES: Determine the relevance of preoperative MRI to predict neurological recovery following cervical TSCI. SETTING: Level I trauma center specialized in TSCI. METHODS: The following three MRI parameters were assessed: presence of an intramedullary hemorrhage, intramedullary lesion length and maximal compression of the spinal cord compression (MSCC). Analyses were performed to assess the relationship between MRI parameters and three neurological outcomes: ASIA motor score (AMS), improvement by at least one ASIA impairment scale (AIS) grade (conversion of AIS grade), and reaching AIS grade D or E. RESULTS: Predicting AMS based on initial AIS grade and intramedullary hemorrhage resulted in a validation R-squared of 0.662, and of 0.636 when using only the initial AIS grade. Predicting conversion of AIS grade based on initial AIS grade, intramedullary hemorrhage and lesion length resulted in a validation c-index of 0.704, and of 0.727 when using only the initial AIS grade. Predicting the likelihood of a follow-up AIS grade D or E based on initial AIS grade and intramedullary hemorrhage in a validation c-index of 0.903, and of 0.873 when using only the initial AIS grade. CONCLUSIONS: Intramedullary hemorrhage and lesion length assessed from preoperative MRI were predictors of the neurological recovery following cervical TSCI. However, the clinical benefit of these MRI parameters to predict the neurological recovery remains limited when the initial AIS grade is available, confirming that the initial neurological status remains the most important predictor of the neurological outcome.
Authors: Michael G Fehlings; Julio C Furlan; Eric M Massicotte; Paul Arnold; Bizhan Aarabi; James Harrop; D Greg Anderson; Christopher M Bono; Marcel Dvorak; Charles Fisher; John France; Rune Hedlund; Ignacio Madrazo; Russ Nockels; Raja Rampersaud; Glenn Rechtine; Alexander R Vaccaro Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2006-07-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Joost P H J Rutges; Brian K Kwon; Manraj Heran; Tamir Ailon; John T Street; Marcel F Dvorak Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2017-04-19 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Jefferson R Wilson; Robert G Grossman; Ralph F Frankowski; Alexander Kiss; Aileen M Davis; Abhaya V Kulkarni; James S Harrop; Bizhan Aarabi; Alexander Vaccaro; Charles H Tator; Marcel Dvorak; Christopher I Shaffrey; Susan Harkema; James D Guest; Michael G Fehlings Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2012-07-31 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Marcel F Dvorak; Vanessa K Noonan; Nader Fallah; Charles G Fisher; Joel Finkelstein; Brian K Kwon; Carly S Rivers; Henry Ahn; Jérôme Paquet; Eve C Tsai; Andrea Townson; Najmedden Attabib; Christopher S Bailey; Sean D Christie; Brian Drew; Daryl R Fourney; Richard Fox; R John Hurlbert; Michael G Johnson; A G Linassi; Stefan Parent; Michael G Fehlings Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2014-11-19 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Gale Whiteneck; Julie Gassaway; Marcel P Dijkers; Allen W Heinemann; Scott E D Kreider Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: J W Fawcett; A Curt; J D Steeves; W P Coleman; M H Tuszynski; D Lammertse; P F Bartlett; A R Blight; V Dietz; J Ditunno; B H Dobkin; L A Havton; P H Ellaway; M G Fehlings; A Privat; R Grossman; J D Guest; N Kleitman; M Nakamura; M Gaviria; D Short Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2006-12-19 Impact factor: 2.772