Literature DB >> 22709268

A clinical prediction model for long-term functional outcome after traumatic spinal cord injury based on acute clinical and imaging factors.

Jefferson R Wilson1, Robert G Grossman, Ralph F Frankowski, Alexander Kiss, Aileen M Davis, Abhaya V Kulkarni, James S Harrop, Bizhan Aarabi, Alexander Vaccaro, Charles H Tator, Marcel Dvorak, Christopher I Shaffrey, Susan Harkema, James D Guest, Michael G Fehlings.   

Abstract

To improve clinicians' ability to predict outcome after spinal cord injury (SCI) and to help classify patients within clinical trials, we have created a novel prediction model relating acute clinical and imaging information to functional outcome at 1 year. Data were obtained from two large prospective SCI datasets. Functional independence measure (FIM) motor score at 1 year follow-up was the primary outcome, and functional independence (score ≥ 6 for each FIM motor item) was the secondary outcome. A linear regression model was created with the primary outcome modeled relative to clinical and imaging predictors obtained within 3 days of injury. A logistic model was then created using the dichotomized secondary outcome and the same predictor variables. Model validation was performed using a bootstrap resampling procedure. Of 729 patients, 376 met the inclusion criteria. The mean FIM motor score at 1 year was 62.9 (±28.6). Better functional status was predicted by less severe initial American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale grade, and by an ASIA motor score >50 at admission. In contrast, older age and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal characteristics consistent with spinal cord edema or hemorrhage predicted worse functional outcome. The linear model predicting FIM motor score demonstrated an R-square of 0.52 in the original dataset, and 0.52 (95% CI 0.52,0.53) across the 200 bootstraps. Functional independence was achieved by 148 patients (39.4%). For the logistic model, the area under the curve was 0.93 in the original dataset, and 0.92 (95% CI 0.92,0.93) across the bootstraps, indicating excellent predictive discrimination. These models will have important clinical impact to guide decision making and to counsel patients and families.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22709268      PMCID: PMC3430477          DOI: 10.1089/neu.2012.2417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  33 in total

1.  Pin sensation as a predictor of extensor carpi radialis recovery in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  B J Browne; S R Jacobs; G J Herbison; J F Ditunno
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  A prediction model for functional recovery in stroke.

Authors:  M G Stineman; G Maislin; R C Fiedler; C V Granger
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 3.  Incidence, prevalence and epidemiology of spinal cord injury: what learns a worldwide literature survey?

Authors:  M Wyndaele; J-J Wyndaele
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2006-01-03       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Interrater reliability of the 7-level functional independence measure (FIM)

Authors:  B B Hamilton; J A Laughlin; R C Fiedler; C V Granger
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1994-09

5.  Conventional MRI as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in spinal cord injury: a systemic review of its application to date and an overview on emerging MRI methods.

Authors:  David W Cadotte; Jefferson R Wilson; David Mikulis; Patrick W Stroman; Sinead Brady; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Expert Opin Med Diagn       Date:  2011-02-08

6.  Motor and sensory recovery following complete tetraplegia.

Authors:  R L Waters; R H Adkins; J S Yakura; I Sie
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Clinical algorithm for improved prediction of ambulation and patient stratification after incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Björn Zörner; Wolf U Blanckenhorn; Volker Dietz; Armin Curt
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.269

8.  Neurological prognosis after traumatic quadriplegia. Three-year experience of California Regional Spinal Cord Injury Care System.

Authors:  F M Maynard; G G Reynolds; S Fountain; C Wilmot; R Hamilton
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  The impact of age on mortality, impairment, and disability among adults with acute traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Julio C Furlan; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.269

10.  Is determination between complete and incomplete traumatic spinal cord injury clinically relevant? Validation of the ASIA sacral sparing criteria in a prospective cohort of 432 patients.

Authors:  J J van Middendorp; A J F Hosman; M H Pouw; H Van de Meent
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 2.772

View more
  42 in total

1.  Clinical applicability of magnetic resonance imaging in acute spinal cord trauma.

Authors:  Dionei Freitas Morais; João Simão de Melo Neto; Lucas Crociati Meguins; Sara Eleodoro Mussi; José Roberto Lopes Ferraz Filho; Waldir Antônio Tognola
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Prediction of functional recovery six months following traumatic spinal cord injury during acute care hospitalization.

Authors:  Andréane Richard- Denis; Debbie Feldman; Cynthia Thompson; Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Quality of life in the subacute period following a cervical traumatic spinal cord injury based on the initial severity of the injury: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Andréane Richard-Denis; Cynthia Thompson; Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  The relevance of MRI for predicting neurological recovery following cervical traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Joanie Martineau; Julien Goulet; Andréane Richard-Denis; Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 5.  Predictors of functional outcomes in adults with traumatic spinal cord injury following inpatient rehabilitation: A systematic review.

Authors:  Faisal AlHuthaifi; Joseph Krzak; Timothy Hanke; Lawrence C Vogel
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Anti-inflammatory effect of delphinidin on intramedullary spinal pressure in a spinal cord injury rat model.

Authors:  Cheng-Hu Wang; Lin-Lin Zhu; Ke-Feng Ju; Jin-Long Liu; Kun-Peng Li
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  The impact of acute management on the occurrence of medical complications during the specialized spinal cord injury acute hospitalization following motor-complete cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Andréane Richard-Denis; Debbie Erhmann Feldman; Cynthia Thompson; Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 1.985

8.  Using Rasch motor FIM individual growth curves to inform clinical decisions for persons with paraplegia.

Authors:  C R Pretz; A J Kozlowski; S Charlifue; Y Chen; A W Heinemann
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 9.  An arrow that missed the mark: a pediatric case report of remarkable neurologic improvement following penetrating spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Lucas P Carlstrom; Christopher S Graffeo; Avital Perry; Denise B Klinkner; David J Daniels
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 10.  Supraspinal Control Predicts Locomotor Function and Forecasts Responsiveness to Training after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Edelle C Field-Fote; Jaynie F Yang; D Michele Basso; Monica A Gorassini
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 5.269

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.