Literature DB >> 31122846

High Variability of Acetabular Offset in Primary Hip Osteoarthritis Influences Acetabular Reaming-A Computed Tomography-Based Anatomic Study.

Christian Merle1, Moritz M Innmann1, Wenzel Waldstein2, Elise C Pegg3, Peter R Aldinger4, Harinderjit S Gill3, David W Murray5, George Grammatopoulos6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objectives of the present study were to (1) evaluate the accuracy and reliability of native acetabular offset (AO) measurements performed on conventional supine anterior-posterior (ap) pelvis radiographs with reference to computed tomography (CT) in patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis (OA); (2) determine the minimum and maximum amount of medialization of the center of rotation (COR) simulating different reaming techniques; and (3) identify patients at increased risk of excessive medialization of the COR.
METHODS: A consecutive series of corresponding 131 CT scans and radiographs of patients with primary hip OA was evaluated using validated software for three-dimensional acetabular and femoral measurements. We simulated the implantation of a hemispherical press-fit cup comparing anatomic and conventional reaming techniques and assessed corresponding changes in AO.
RESULTS: Standardized ap pelvis radiographs allowed for an accurate and reliable assessment of AO compared with CT. Cup placement in the most lateral position (anatomic reaming technique) resulted in a mean implant-related medialization of 5.9 ± 3.4 mm. Anatomic cup placement did not require reaming to the true floor in 64 hips (49%). With the conventional reaming technique, the total medialization of the COR (implant-related and reaming-related) was 6.8 ± 2.9, with 34% of cases having a medialization ≥8 mm.
CONCLUSION: The present study highlights the variability of acetabular anatomy in patients with primary OA. AO can be accurately and reliably determined on conventional radiographs and appears to be independent of femoral shape and geometry. Depending on the preferred reaming technique a substantial number of patients appear at risk for excessive cup medialization.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arthroplasty; hip; offset; osteoarthritis; reaming

Year:  2019        PMID: 31122846     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  5 in total

1.  Anatomic placement of the acetabular implant in cementless total hip arthroplasty does not adversely affect the implant survival and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Shakir Hussain; Shahbaz S Malik; Basil Budair; Divya Prakash
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-06-20

Review 2.  [What are the benefits of patient-specific reconstruction in total hip replacement?]

Authors:  Christian Merle; Moritz M Innmann; Fabian Westhauser; Patrick Sadoghi; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  CT Based Analysis of Acetabular Morphology in Northern Indian Population: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Souvik Paul; Sukhmin Singh; Balgovind S Raja; Dipun Mishra; R B Kalia
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 4.  Cup placement in primary total hip arthroplasty: how to get it right without navigation or robotics.

Authors:  Geert Meermans; George Grammatopoulos; Moritz Innmann; David Beverland
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-05-31

5.  CORR Insights®: Anatomical Mapping of the External Obturator Footprint: A Study In Cadavers with Implications for Direct Anterior THA.

Authors:  Geert Meermans
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.755

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.