Literature DB >> 31122812

Renal Masses: Evaluation with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound, with a Special Focus on the Pseudocapsule Sign.

Wen-Bin Dai1, Bo Yu2, Xue-Hong Diao3, Hongli Cao3, Lin Chen3, Yue Chen3, Jia Zhan4.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in differentiating between benign and malignant renal masses, with a special emphasis on the value of the pseudocapsule sign. A total of 163 consecutive patients with 163 renal masses were involved. The conventional ultrasonography and CEUS features were assessed. Sensitivity, specificity and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) were calculated for qualitative CEUS, and a multivariate analysis was performed to analyze the correlation between the sonographic features and malignancy. Time to peak (TTP) and peak intensity (PI) were compared between benign and malignant renal masses for quantitative CEUS analysis in 72 of 163 patients. Intraclass correlations were calculated for variability in intensity and time parameters between qualitative and quantitative evaluation. Among all qualitative CEUS features, the pseudocapsule sign showed the highest Az (0.777; 95% confidence interval: 0.701-0.853) and yielded the highest sensitivity (67.4%) and specificity (88.0%); multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the pseudocapsule sign and color Doppler flow imaging patterns were the two strongest independent predictors for malignancy. For quantitative CEUS analysis, higher PI and shorter TTP were found in malignant renal masses than those in benign ones. The Intraclass correlation coefficient values among qualitative and the quantitative assessments were 0.00 for time and 0.03 for intensity. The pseudocapsule sign offered the most efficient performance among all the qualitative and quantitative CEUS features.
Copyright © 2019 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS); Differential diagnosis; Pseudocapsule sign; Quantitative parameters; Renal mass

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31122812     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.03.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  4 in total

Review 1.  An overview of non-invasive imaging modalities for diagnosis of solid and cystic renal lesions.

Authors:  Ravinder Kaur; Mamta Juneja; A K Mandal
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  The quantitative evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differentiation of small renal cell carcinoma subtypes and angiomyolipoma.

Authors:  Hui Liu; Hongli Cao; Lin Chen; Liang Fang; Yingchun Liu; Jia Zhan; Xuehong Diao; Yue Chen
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-01

3.  Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Evaluation of Renal Masses with Histopathological Validation-Results from a Prospective Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Antonio Tufano; Francesco Maria Drudi; Flavia Angelini; Eleonora Polito; Milvia Martino; Antonio Granata; Giovanni Battista Di Pierro; Eriselda Kutrolli; Matteo Sampalmieri; Vittorio Canale; Rocco Simone Flammia; Daniele Fresilli; Michele Bertolotto; Costantino Leonardo; Giorgio Franco; Vito Cantisani
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-12

Review 4.  Characteristics of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for diagnosis of solid clear cell renal cell carcinomas ≤4 cm: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Yanmin Kan; Jincun Zhang; Ning Li; Yihua Wang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.452

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.