Literature DB >> 22536824

Gamete donors' motivation in a Swedish national sample: is there any ambivalence? A descriptive study.

Agneta Skoog Svanberg1, Claudia Lampic, Ann-Louise Gejervall, Ann-Louise Geijerwall, Johannes Gudmundsson, Per-Olof Karlström, Nils-Gunnar Solensten, Gunilla Sydsjö.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study donors' motivation and ambivalence before donation of gametes.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Seven Swedish university hospital clinics. Sample. Of the 220 eligible oocyte donors and 156 eligible sperm donors who were approached, 181 (82%) oocyte donors and 119 (76%) sperm donors agreed to participate.
METHODS: Gamete donors completed a questionnaire in the clinic prior to the donation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Motives and ambivalence towards donation.
RESULTS: In general, gamete donors donated for altruistic reasons (95%). A greater percentage of oocyte than sperm donors had a personal experience of biological children, which motivated them to donate (65 vs. 32%). A greater percentage of sperm donors compared with oocyte donors were curious about their own fertility (24 vs. 9%), and they also believed that they were contributing what they regarded as their own good genes to other couples (45 vs. 20%). Prior to donation, potential sperm donors were more ambivalent towards donating than were oocyte donors (39 and 21%, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The motives to donate gametes are mainly altruistic. We conclude that men and women differ in their view towards donating gametes. Sperm donors had a higher degree of ambivalent feelings towards donation than oocyte donors.
© 2012 The Authors Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica© 2012 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22536824     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01430.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  6 in total

1.  In search of stool donors: a multicenter study of prior knowledge, perceptions, motivators, and deterrents among potential donors for fecal microbiota transplantation.

Authors:  Breanna McSweeney; Jessica R Allegretti; Monika Fischer; Huiping Xu; Karen J Goodman; Tanya Monaghan; Carmen McLeod; Benjamin H Mullish; Elaine O Petrof; Emmalee L Phelps; Roxana Chis; Abby Edmison; Angela Juby; Ralph Ennis-Davis; Brandi Roach; Karen Wong; Dina Kao
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2019-05-23

Review 2.  Psychosocial aspects of identity-release gamete donation - perspectives of donors, recipients, and offspring.

Authors:  Agneta Skoog Svanberg; Gunilla Sydsjö; Claudia Lampic
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 2.384

3.  Gamete donors' satisfaction; gender differences and similarities among oocyte and sperm donors in a national sample.

Authors:  Agneta Skoog Svanberg; Claudia Lampic; Ann-Louise Gejerwall; Johannes Gudmundsson; Per-Olof Karlström; Nils-Gunnar Solensten; Gunilla Sydsjö
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  Attitudes towards disclosure and relationship to donor offspring among a national cohort of identity-release oocyte and sperm donors.

Authors:  C Lampic; A Skoog Svanberg; G Sydsjö
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Parenting stress and its association with perceived agreement about the disclosure decision in parents following donor conception.

Authors:  Anja J Gebhardt; Gunilla Sydsjö; Agneta Skoog Svanberg; Astrid Indekeu; Claudia Lampic
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.636

6.  Rethinking gamete donor care: A satisfaction survey of egg and sperm donors in the UK.

Authors:  Richard A Williams; Laura L Machin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.