BACKGROUND: Two debilitating sequelae of diabetes are foot ulcerations and vision impairing conditions including retinopathy, open-angle glaucoma, and cataracts. Current standard of care recommends daily visual screening of feet. Despite willingness, many patients are impeded by visual impairment. We investigate whether once-daily remote temperature monitoring can improve self-screening for patients at risk for diabetic foot complications. METHODS: We followed four male veterans with diabetes mellitus, peripheral neuropathy, impaired visual acuity, and at least one other diabetes-related visual impairment in a high-risk podiatry clinic. Patients received a telemedicine remote temperature monitoring mat and instructed on proper daily use. Each patient developed a "hotspot," defined as a 1.75°C localized temperature difference between matched pedal locations, which resulted in telephone triage outreach. RESULTS: In three cases, outreach resulted in a sooner appointment where patients were found to have a relevant outcome at the hotspot. Patients in cases 1-3 had University of Texas (UT) 1A ulcerations. The patient in case 4 had inflammation from trauma. All patients had refractive errors plus another vision impairing condition that potentially delayed identification of lesions. Patients in cases 1 and 2 have cataracts, patients in cases 2 and 3 have retinopathy, and patient in case 4 has glaucoma. CONCLUSIONS: As an adjunct to daily preventative diabetic self-care, once-daily remote temperature monitoring technology can augment self-screening to prompt necessary outreach and treatment and potentially prevent costly and debilitating diabetic foot complications. This case series serves as a pilot study for real-world application of thermometry, where further large-scale research is needed.
BACKGROUND: Two debilitating sequelae of diabetes are foot ulcerations and vision impairing conditions including retinopathy, open-angle glaucoma, and cataracts. Current standard of care recommends daily visual screening of feet. Despite willingness, many patients are impeded by visual impairment. We investigate whether once-daily remote temperature monitoring can improve self-screening for patients at risk for diabetic foot complications. METHODS: We followed four male veterans with diabetes mellitus, peripheral neuropathy, impaired visual acuity, and at least one other diabetes-related visual impairment in a high-risk podiatry clinic. Patients received a telemedicine remote temperature monitoring mat and instructed on proper daily use. Each patient developed a "hotspot," defined as a 1.75°C localized temperature difference between matched pedal locations, which resulted in telephone triage outreach. RESULTS: In three cases, outreach resulted in a sooner appointment where patients were found to have a relevant outcome at the hotspot. Patients in cases 1-3 had University of Texas (UT) 1A ulcerations. The patient in case 4 had inflammation from trauma. All patients had refractive errors plus another vision impairing condition that potentially delayed identification of lesions. Patients in cases 1 and 2 have cataracts, patients in cases 2 and 3 have retinopathy, and patient in case 4 has glaucoma. CONCLUSIONS: As an adjunct to daily preventative diabetic self-care, once-daily remote temperature monitoring technology can augment self-screening to prompt necessary outreach and treatment and potentially prevent costly and debilitating diabetic foot complications. This case series serves as a pilot study for real-world application of thermometry, where further large-scale research is needed.
Entities:
Keywords:
diabetic foot ulcer; early detection; remote temperature monitoring; visual impairment
Authors: S A Bus; J J van Netten; L A Lavery; M Monteiro-Soares; A Rasmussen; Y Jubiz; P E Price Journal: Diabetes Metab Res Rev Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 4.876
Authors: Lawrence A Lavery; Kevin R Higgins; Dan R Lanctot; George P Constantinides; Ruben G Zamorano; David G Armstrong; Kyriacos A Athanasiou; C Mauli Agrawal Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Robert G Frykberg; Thomas Zgonis; David G Armstrong; Vickie R Driver; John M Giurini; Steven R Kravitz; Adam S Landsman; Lawrence A Lavery; J Christopher Moore; John M Schuberth; Dane K Wukich; Charles Andersen; John V Vanore Journal: J Foot Ankle Surg Date: 2006 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.286
Authors: Adam L Isaac; Timothy D Swartz; Mark L Miller; Daniel J Short; Eleanor A Wilson; Jamie L Chaffo; Eric S Watson; Haihong Hu; Brian J Petersen; Jonathan D Bloom; Nicole J Neff; David R Linders; Simon J Salgado; Jessica L Locke; Michael A Horberg Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2020-10