| Literature DB >> 31121893 |
Eman A Al-Harbi1, Mona H Abdelrahman2, Amira M El-Kosasy3.
Abstract
Several emerging nano scale forms of carbon are showing great promise in electrochemical sensing such as graphene and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). Herein we present an ecofriendly method to fabricate long life and sensitive ion selective sensors based on graphene and MWCNTs nanocomposites with no need for volatile organic solvents. Both sensors were fabricated, for the analysis of carbachol in ophthalmic solutions, plasma and urine where ion- association complex was formed between cationic carbachol and anionic Sodium tetra phenyl borate (NaTBP) in a ratio 1:1. Both sensors were evaluated according to the IUPAC recommendation data, revealing linear response in the concentration range 10-7 M to 10-2 M with near Nernstian slopes 50.80 ± 5 and 58.14 ± 3 mV/decade and correlation coefficients 0.9992 and 0.9998 for graphene and MWCNTs based sensors, respectively. Both sensors were successfully applied as stability indicating method for the analysis of carbachol in presence of its metabolite choline, in ophthalmic preparations, in plasma and urine showing good recovery percentage values. MWCNTs based sensor showed some advantages over graphene sensor regarding lower limit of detection (LOD), longer life time and higher selectivity towards carbachol. Statistical comparison of the proposed sensors with the official method showed no significant difference for accuracy and precision.Entities:
Keywords: carbachol; graphene; nanocomposites, ecofriendly; sensor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31121893 PMCID: PMC6566716 DOI: 10.3390/s19102357
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Molecular models of sp2-bonded carbon nanostructures: (a) graphene clusters, (b) single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), (c) multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) formed from continuous concentric graphene tubes.
Figure 2The chemical structure of carbachol chloride.
Figure 3Experimental setup of the proposed sensors.
Figure 4Profile of the potential in mV versus −log [carbachol] using the proposed sensors.
General electrochemical characteristics of the proposed sensors.
| Parameter | Graphene Sensor 1 | MWCNTs Sensor 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Slope (mV/decade) | 50.80 | 58.14 |
| Intercept (mV) | 487.27 | 605.48 |
| LOD (M) | 1.2 × 10−8 | 1.1 × 10−8 |
| Response time (seconds) | 5 | 5 |
| Working pH range | 4–8 | 4–8 |
| Concentration range (M) | 10−7–10−2 | 10−7–10−2 |
| Stability (days) | 45 | 60 |
| Average recovery 1 | 98.68 | 100.41 |
| Correlation coefficient | 0.9992 | 0.9998 |
| Intraday precision 2 (%RSD) | 1.2 | 0.50 |
| Interday precision 2 (%RSD) | 2.1 | 0.11 |
1 Average of three determinations on six concentration levels. 2 Average of nine determinations.
A comparison between the proposed sensors and the published electrochemical method [28].
| Parameter | Proposed Nanoscale Sensors | Ordinary Scale Sensors [ |
|---|---|---|
| LOD (M) | 1.2 × 10−8–1.1 × 10−8 | 2.6 ×10−6–1.2 × 10−7 |
| Response time (seconds) | 5 | 6–8 |
| Sensitivity (M) | 1 × 10−7 | 10−5–10−6 |
| Stability (days) | 45–60 | 28–30 |
| Average recovery 1 | 98.68–100.41 | - |
| Intraday precision 2 (%RSD) | 0.5–1.2 | - |
| Interday precision 2 (%RSD) | 0.11–2.10 | - |
| Impact on environment | No VOC used | THF used |
| Applications | Plasma | Ophthalmic solutions |
1 Average of three determinations on six concentration levels. 2 Average of nine determinations.
Figure 5Effect of pH on the response of the proposed sensors.
Potentiometric selectivity coefficients (Log Kpot carbachol, interferent) for the proposed sensors.
| Interferent | Log K for Sensor 1 | Log K for Sensor 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Choline | 0.7 × 10−3 | 0.2 × 10−4 |
| Benzalkonium chloride | 0.3 × 10−3 | 0.3 × 10−3 |
| NaCl | 0.4 × 10−3 | 0.8 × 10−4 |
| KCl | 0.4 × 10−3 | 0.3 × 10−4 |
| CaCl2 hydrate | 0.4 × 10−3 | 0.3 × 10−4 |
| 2-chloroethanol | 0.5 × 10−3 | 0.2 × 10−3 |
| Urea | 0.3 × 10−3 | 0.2 × 10−4 |
| K carbamate | 0.7 × 10−3 | 0.3 × 10−3 |
| Triethylamine | 0.4 × 10−3 | 0.8 × 10−3 |
Application of proposed sensors in Miostat and Jestryl ophthalmic solutions.
| Pharmaceutical Preparation | Sensor 1 Recovery% ± SD | Sensor 2 Recovery% ± SD |
|---|---|---|
| Miostat 0.01% | 99.74 ± 2.11 | 100.98 ± 0.314 |
| Jestryl 0.00025/mL | 100.33 ± 1.815 | 100.07 ± 0.487 |
Determination of carbachol in spiked human plasma and urine samples by the proposed sensors.
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 × 10−7 | 1.04 × 10−7 | 104.00 | 9.94 × 10−8 | 99.40 |
| 1 × 10−5 | 9.87 × 10−6 | 98.70 | 9.98 × 10−5 | 99.80 |
| 1 × 10−3 | 1.02 × 10−3 | 102.00 | 9.98 × 10−2 | 99.80 |
| Mean ± SD | 101.60 ± 2.68 | 99.70 ± 0.23 | ||
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 × 10−7 | 1.08 × 10−7 | 108.00 | 9.97 × 10−8 | 99.70 |
| 1 × 10−6 | 9.93 × 10−7 | 99.30 | 9.94 × 10−7 | 99.40 |
| 1 × 10−5 | 1.07 × 10−5 | 107.00 | 9.99 × 10−6 | 99.90 |
| Mean ± SD | 104.80 ± 4.76 | 99.70 ± 0.25 | ||
1 Average of three determinations.
Determination of carbachol in presence of its degradation product, choline.
| Choline Concentration | Sensor 1 Recovery % | Sensor 2 Recovery % |
|---|---|---|
| 10.0% | 99.59 | 100.11 |
| 20.0% | 101.50 | 100.60 |
| 30.0% | 100.23 | 101.62 |
| 40.0% | 101.82 | 100.81 |
| 50.0% | 101.21 | 100.03 |
| 60.0% | 102.17 | 100.75 |
| 70.0% | 102.73 | 101.46 |
| 80.0% | 103.11 | 102.33 |
| 90.0% | 102.92 | 102.34 |
| Mean ± SD | 101.70 ± 1.21 | 101.12 ± 0.87 |
Statistical comparison between the determination of carbachol and the official method.
| Parameter | Sensor 1 | Sensor 2 | The Official Method [ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean % | 98.68 | 100.41 | 99.72 |
| SD | 1.21 | 0.86 | 1.19 |
| Variance | 1.46 | 0.74 | 1.42 |
| n | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Students | 1.33 | −1.0 | -- |
| F-test | 1.03 | 1.92 | -- |
* The figures in parenthesis are the corresponding theoretical values for F and t at p = 0.05.
Figure 6The proposed structural formula of the ion-association complex.